New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. State Finance Law § 135 (2026)

Separate specifications for contract work for the state

✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 135. Separate specifications for contract work for the state. Except
as otherwise provided in section two hundred twenty-two of the labor
law, every officer, board, department, commission or commissions,
charged with the duty of preparing specifications or awarding or
entering into contracts for the erection, construction or alteration of
buildings, for the state, when the entire cost of such work shall exceed
three million dollars in the counties of the Bronx, Kings, New York,
Queens, and Richmond; one million five hundred thousand dollars in the
counties of Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester; and five hundred thousand
dollars in all other counties within the state, must have prepared
separate specifications for each of the following three subdivisions of
the work to be performed:
  1. Plumbing and gas fitting.
  2. Steam heating, hot water heating, ventilating and air conditioning
apparatus.
  3. Electric wiring and standard illuminating fixtures.
  Such specifications must be so drawn as to permit separate and
independent bidding upon each of the above three subdivisions of work.
All contracts hereafter awarded by the state or a department, board,
commissioner or officer thereof, for the erection, construction or
alteration of buildings, or any part thereof, shall award the three
subdivisions of the above specified work separately to responsible and
reliable persons, firms or corporations engaged in these classes of
work. A contract for one or more buildings in any project shall be
awarded to the lowest responsible bidder for all the buildings included
in the specifications.
  Each bidder on a public work contract, where the preparation of
separate specifications is not required, shall submit with its bid a
separate sealed list that names each subcontractor that the bidder will
use to perform work on the contract, and the agreed-upon amount to be
paid to each, for: (a) plumbing and gas fitting, (b) steam heating, hot
water heating, ventilating and air conditioning apparatus and (c)
electric wiring and standard illuminating fixtures. After the low bid is
announced, the sealed list of subcontractors submitted with such low bid
shall be opened and the names of such subcontractors shall be announced,
and thereafter any change of subcontractor or agreed-upon amount to be
paid to each shall require the approval of the public owner, upon a
showing presented to the public owner of legitimate construction need
for such change, which shall be open to public inspection. Legitimate
construction need shall include, but not be limited to, a change in
project specifications, a change in construction material costs, a
change to subcontractor status as determined pursuant to paragraph (e)
of subdivision two of section two hundred twenty-two of the labor law,
or the subcontractor has become otherwise unwilling, unable or
unavailable to perform the subcontract. The sealed lists of
subcontractors submitted by all other bidders shall be returned to them
unopened after the contract award.
  Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the authorities
in charge of any state building, from performing any such branches of
work by or through their regular employees, or in the case of public
institutions, by the incarcerated individuals thereof.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Gen. Contrs. v. Thruway, 666 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1996).
Gen. Contrs. v. Thruway, 666 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1996). · cites it 4× “Thereafter, the court annulled the PLA as violative of the competitive bidding requirements of State Finance Law § 135 and Public Buildings Law § 8.”
New York State Chapter, Inc. v. New York State Thruway Auth., 666 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1996). · cites it 4× “Thereafter, the court annulled the PLA as violative of the competitive bidding requirements of State Finance Law § 135 and Public Buildings Law § 8.”
E.W. Tompkins Co. v. State Univ. of New York, 61 A.D.3d 1248 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2009). “Moreover, Supreme Court properly found that Education Law § 376—not General Municipal Law § 103 or State Finance Law § 135—governed this bidding process and, thus, SUNY was authorized by statute to “award one contract for all the work to be performed .”
Gen. Bldg. Contractors of New York State, Inc. v. Dormitory Auth., 210 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1994). · cites it 3× “Applying the State Chapter case analysis to the PLA at issue in this case and the facts and circumstances surrounding the Dormitory Authority’s decision to use the PLA, we find no violation of the relevant competitive bidding statute (see, Public Authorities Law § 1680; State…”
Empire State Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Smith, 992 N.E.2d 1067 (N.Y. 2013). “ks Law, originally enacted in 1912, requires public entities seeking bids on construction contracts to obtain “separate specifications” for three “subdivisions of the work to be *314 performed”—generally, plumbing, electrical and HVAC (heating, ventilating and air conditioning)…”
Empire State Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Smith, 30 Misc. 3d 455 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010). “…A brief review of the history of the Wicks Law statutes themselves (found in General Municipal Law §§ 101 and 103, State Finance Law §§ 135 and 144, Labor Law § 222 [2] [e], and Public Housing Law § 151-a) reveals that over the years since *457 1912 an ever-increasing…”
Moscato v. City of New York, 183 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1992). “Subsequently, Thomason moved for an order pursuant to CPLR 3212, General Obligations Law § 15-108 (c), General Municipal Law § 101 and State Finance Law § 135 to dismiss all claims and "purported” cross claims against it.”
Matter of New York State Ass'n of Plumbing-heating-cooling Contractors, Inc. v. Egan, 482 N.E.2d 908 (N.Y. 1985). “Although the papers do not suggest that there was fraud or collusion on the part of the contractors, that fact does not foreclose recovery from them to the extent that petitioner can show after trial that the State paid more under these contracts than it would have had to pay…”
Matter of Daniel J. Lynch, Inc. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Maine-Endwell Cent. Sch. Dist., 2025 NY Slip Op 25031 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Broome Cty. 2025). “Rules declaring Void, Unenforceable and Illegal a contract awarded July 2, 2024 to SMITH SITE DEVELOPMENT LLC to perform work for the Maine-Endwell Central School District and mandating repayment of contract funds paid on the basis the procurement and contract award was…”
Matter of Daniel J. Lynch, Inc. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Maine-Endwell Cent. Sch. Dist., 2025 NY Slip Op 25031 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Broome Cty. 2025). “Rules declaring Void, Unenforceable and Illegal a contract awarded July 2, 2024 to SMITH SITE DEVELOPMENT LLC to perform work for the Maine-Endwell Central School District and mandating repayment of contract funds paid on the basis the procurement and contract award was…”
Constr. Contractors Ass'n of Hudson Valley v. Bd. of Trs. of Orange Cmty. Coll., 149 Misc. 2d 440 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1991). “Petitioners argue that such requirement is contrary to the provisions of General Municipal Law § 101, and State Finance Law § 135, in that the over-all supervision and coordination of the other prime contractors, in this multiple contract for public work, must reside with the…”
Empire State Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Smith, 98 A.D.3d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2012). · cites it 2× “, plumbing and gas fitting; heating, ventilating and air conditioning; and electric wiring and light fixtures (see General Municipal Law § 101 [1] [a]-[c]; [2]; State Finance Law § 135; Public Authorities Law §§ 1045-i [2-a]; 1048-i [2-a]; 3303 [10] [c-1]; 3402 [9] [c-1]; 3603…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.