New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. State Finance Law § 18 (2026)

Interest and collection fees assessed on debts owed to the state

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 18. Interest and collection fees assessed on debts owed to the
state.  1. As used in this section: (a) "state agency" shall mean any
state department, board, bureau, division, commission, committee, public
authority, public benefit corporation, council, office, or other
governmental entity performing a governmental or proprietary function
for the state; (b) "debt" shall mean any liquidated sum due and owing
any state agency which has accrued pursuant to law or through contract,
subrogation, tort or other cause of action, except a liability resulting
from taxes or other impositions administered by the state commissioner
of taxation and finance, regardless of whether there is an outstanding
judgment for that sum; (c) "debtor" shall mean any individual, business,
or other entity, which is not a state agency, municipal corporation or
district corporation, having a debt with any state agency; (d)
"liquidated" shall mean an amount which is fixed or certain or capable
of being readily calculated, whether or not the underlying liability or
amount of the debt is disputed; and (e) "outstanding" debt shall mean
the amount set forth in the billing invoice or notice mailed to the
debtor, together with late payment charges and interest, less any
payments made by or on behalf of the debtor.
  2. For the purposes of this section, a state agency shall mail a dated
billing invoice or notice on or about the day it is dated, and receipt
by the debtor of a billing invoice or notice is deemed to have occurred
five days after its date.
  3. Unless provided otherwise by contract, statute or regulation, a
debtor owing a debt to any state agency shall pay such debt on or before
the thirtieth day following such debtor's receipt of any billing invoice
or notice sent by the state agency that such debt is due and owing and
that failure to make timely payment, as stated in the billing invoice or
notice, will result in the assessment of interest or a late payment
charge and may result in a charge to cover the cost of processing,
handling, and collecting such debt.
  4. Unless provided otherwise by contract, statute or regulation, a
debtor that fails to make payment of a debt within the period set forth
in subdivision three of this section shall pay, in addition to the
amount of debt, interest on the outstanding balance of the debt,
accruing on the date on which the receipt of the first billing invoice
or first notice occurs, computed at the underpayment rate which is in
effect on the date which the receipt of the first billing invoice or
first billing notice occurs. For the purposes of this section, the
underpayment rate shall be that rate set by the commissioner of taxation
and finance and published in the state register pursuant to subsection
(e) of section one thousand ninety-six of the tax law minus four
percentage points. With respect to specific classes of debt collected by
a state agency, the director of the budget or official of a state agency
so designated by the director of the budget may approve the assessment
of interest at a date later than the thirtieth day following such
debtor's receipt of any billing invoice or notice sent by the state
agency.
  5. In addition to the charges referred to in subdivision four of this
section, and unless provided otherwise by contract, statute or
regulation, a debtor that fails to make payment of a debt subject to
this section within ninety days of receipt by the debtor of the first
billing invoice or notice may be assessed an additional collection fee
charge to cover the cost of processing, handling and collecting such
debt, not to exceed twenty-two percent of the outstanding debt, which
collection fee shall be added to and payable in the same manner as the
outstanding debt. The assessed collection fee charge may not exceed the
agency's estimated cost of processing, handling and collecting such
debt.
  5-a. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this section, no state
agency shall assess the additional collection fee charge described in
subdivision five of this section on any debt subject to this section
owed by a debtor to a state agency for a liability resulting from
tuition, fees, room and board, educational benefit overpayments, student
loans, or other such charges incurred by a student in furtherance of
such student's education.
  6. Any interest or late payment charges assessed pursuant to this
section shall be paid upon notice and demand and shall be treated and
collected in the same manner as the original debt which is due and owing
and shall be collected by a state agency when such agency deems
collection to be administratively practical and cost-effective. Any
collection fee charges assessed pursuant to this section shall be paid
upon notice and demand and shall be collected by a state agency when
such agency deems collection to be administratively practical and
cost-effective. In any action brought by or on behalf of a state agency
to recover an outstanding debt, a demand for collection fee charges may
be set forth in the statement of damages sought.
  7. The state director of the budget shall promulgate such guidelines
as the director deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this
section.
  8. The provisions of this section shall not supersede any provision of
law or regulation or contract which provides for the imposition of
interest or late payment or collection fee charges on debts not
satisfied in a timely manner.
  9. All contracts entered into or any regulation promulgated on or
after the effective date of this section which waives the imposition of
interest or late payment or collection fee charges or imposes interest
or late payment charges or collection fee charges in a manner
inconsistent with this section must be approved by the state division of
the budget.
  10. Every state agency to which this section is applicable is
authorized to enter into written agreements with any debtor under which
such debtor is allowed to satisfy liability for payment of any debt,
including any interest imposed by this section on that portion of such
debt as to which an extension is granted, in installment payments if the
state agency determines that such agreement will facilitate collection
of such liability. Provided further, that where such state agency
determines that immediate collection of the debt would jeopardize the
debtor's fiscal viability and thereby pose a hardship to the public,
such agency shall offer to enter into a written agreement to temporarily
defer collection of the debt, collect the debt on an installment basis,
or make other reasonable arrangements to reduce such hardship on the
public of collecting the debt.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: New York State Thruway Auth. v. Allied Waste Servs. of North Am., LLC, 143 A.D.3d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016).
New York State Thruway Auth. v. Allied Waste Servs. of North Am., LLC, 143 A.D.3d 1145 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). · cites it 14× “-2- 522631 After failing to reach a resolution, plaintiff commenced this action in March 2014 asserting negligence, among other causes of action, and seeking damages in the amount of $913,276, a collection fee pursuant to State Finance Law § 18 in the amount of $200,920 and…”
Commissioners of the State Ins. Fund v. Brooklyn Barber Beauty Equip. Co., 191 Misc. 2d 1 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 2001). · cites it 18× “53 in collection costs (State Finance Law § 18 [5]); and interest from August 31, 1996 (State Finance Law § 18 [3], [4]).”
Lawyers' Fund for Client Prot. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co., 727 N.E.2d 563 (NY 2000). · cites it 4× “We also conclude that the Lawyers’ Fund is entitled to interest from the date of the conversion, but is not entitled to a collection fee under State Finance Law § 18. I Nine days after executing the agreement with the Estate, the Lawyers’ Fund brought this action for conversion…”
State of New York v. Konikov, 2020 NY Slip Op 2224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). · cites it 2× “OCFS is a state agency ( see Executive Law § 500; State Finance Law § 18 [1] [a]; Matter of Metacarpa v Johnson , 268 AD2d 938, 939 [2000]) and, in the absence of any statutory restrictions, it was appropriate that this action to recover fines due from defendant to a state…”
Lawyers' Fund v. Gateway State Bank, 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997). · cites it 2× “This request is predicated upon State Finance Law § 18, which authorizes such a fee where a debtor fails to pay a debt to the State within 90 days of the submission of an invoice (State Finance Law § 18 [5]). Given the fact that at this point plaintiff merely has an inchoate…”
New York State Workers' Comp. Bd. v. Episcopal Church Home & Affiliates, Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 04054 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). · cites it 2× “The first seeks to impose on defendants joint and several liability for their [*2]shares of the Trust's cumulative deficit, and the second seeks to recover a collection fee pursuant to State Finance Law § 18. Plaintiff moved for, inter alia, partial summary judgment on the issue…”
Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Hallmark Operating, Inc., 61 A.D.3d 1212 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). “72, *1214 representing 14% of the amount owed, which reflected the amount charged by counsel to prosecute the collection matter (see State Finance Law § 18 [5]). Cardona, EJ.”
New York State Thruway Auth. v. Level 3 Commc'ns, LLC, 734 F. Supp. 2d 257 (N.D.N.Y. 2010). “On March 3, 2010, NYSTA filed an Amended Complaint pleading breach of a contract, a State Finance Law § 18 claim, a separate anticipatory breach of contract, and further a claim seeking a declaratory judgment.”
Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Photocircuits Corp., 20 A.D.3d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). “Now, the Fund, through this action, is seeking an additional $466,100, plus costs (pursuant to State Finance Law § 18 [5]), to cover certain additional claims which arose during the term of the policy but were resolved between 1996 and 2001.”
Matter of New York State Workers' Comp. Bd. v. Murray Bresky Consultants, Ltd, 2017 NY Slip Op 8244 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). “In January 2008, petitioner commenced an action to recover the trust’s deficit against employers who had been members of the trust, including respondent, alleging that each was jointly and severally liable for the deficit (see State Finance Law § 18). Thereafter, respondent…”
State of New York v. Oren-Pines, 2024 NY Slip Op 50958(U) (N.Y. Sup. Albany 2024). · cites it 2× “Based on allegations that defendant breached the contract by failing to timely deliver the promised ventilators, the State seeks to recover $10 million, representing the balance of funds paid to defendant under the contract, together with a 22% collection fee under State Finance…”
State of New York v. Oren-Pines, 2024 NY Slip Op 50958(U) (N.Y. Sup. Albany 2024). · cites it 2× “Based on allegations that defendant breached the contract by failing to timely deliver the promised ventilators, the State seeks to recover $10 million, representing the balance of funds paid to defendant under the contract, together with a 22% collection fee under State Finance…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.