N.Y. Laws » CHAPTER State Technology / ARTICLE Electronic Signatures and Records Act
New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. State Technology Law § 306 (2026)

Admissibility into evidence

✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
§ 306. Admissibility into evidence. In any legal proceeding where the
provisions of the civil practice law and rules are applicable, an
electronic record or electronic signature may be admitted into evidence
pursuant to the provisions of article forty-five of the civil practice
law and rules including, but not limited to section four thousand five
hundred thirty-nine of such law and rules.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2023 · leading case: Martin v. Portexit Corp., 98 A.D.3d 63 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Martin v. Portexit Corp., 98 A.D.3d 63 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2012). “However, requiring such additional information imports a requirement not contemplated or included in either E-SIGN’s provision for signatures made under oath (see 15 USC § 7001 [g]), or State Technology Law § 304 (2). 1 Additionally, State Technology Law § 306 provides that in…”
Knight v. New York & Presbyt. Hosp., 219 A.D.3d 75 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2023). “Anticipating such difficulties, the ESRA provides that electronic records and signatures may be admitted into evidence pursuant to the provisions of CPLR article 45, including specifically CPLR 4539 ( see State Technology Law § 306). CPLR 4539, in turn, provides that electronic…”
People v. Rath, 41 Misc. 3d 869 (2013). · cites it 2× “” State Technology Law § 306 provides: *878 “In any legal proceeding where the provisions of the civil practice law and rules are applicable, an electronic record or electronic signature may be admitted into evidence pursuant to the provisions of article forty-five of the civil…”
Vrlaku v. Plaza Constr. Corp., 57 Misc. 3d 643 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2017). “” State Technology Law § 306 provides: “In any legal proceeding where the provisions of the civil practice law and rules are applicable, an electronic record or electronic signature may be admitted into evidence pursuant to the provisions of article forty-five of the civil…”
People v. Hernandez, 31 Misc. 3d 208 (2011). “CPLR 4539 (b); see State Technology Law § 306 (“In any legal proceeding where the provisions of the civil practice law and rules are applicable, an electronic record or electronic signature may be admitted into evidence pursuant to the provisions of article forty-five of the…”
Wen Zong Yu v. Charles Schwab & Co., 34 Misc. 3d 32 (N.Y. App. Term. 2011). “Plaintiff did not object at trial to the sufficiency of defendant’s proof of this signature and of the validity of the initial brokerage agreement (see CPLR 4518 [a]; 4539 [b]; State Technology Law § 306), nor did he deny that the parties’ initial agreement bound the parties.”
Miriam Osborn Mem'l Home Ass'n v. Assessor, 9 Misc. 3d 1019 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2005). · cites it 2× “” State Technology Law § 306 Section 306 (formerly § 106) of the State Technology Law, entitled “Admissibility into evidence,” states: “In any legal proceeding where the provisions of the civil practice law and rules are applicable, an electronic record or electronic signature…”
Martin v. Portexit Corp., 98 A.D.3d 63 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2012). “However, requiring such additional information imports a requirement not contemplated or included in either E-SIGN’s provision for signatures made under oath (see 15 USC § 7001 [g]), or State Technology Law § 304 (2). 1 Additionally, State Technology Law § 306 provides that in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.