New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Tax Law § 1147 (2026)
Notices and limitations of time
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 1147. Notices and limitations of time. (a) (1) Any notice authorized or required under the provisions of this article may be given by mailing the same to the person for whom it is intended in a postpaid envelope addressed to such person at the address given in the last return filed by him pursuant to the provisions of this article or in any application made by him or, if no return has been filed or application made, then to such address as may be obtainable. A notice of determination shall be mailed promptly by registered or certified mail. The mailing of such notice shall be presumptive evidence of the receipt of the same by the person to whom addressed. Any period of time which is determined according to the provisions of this article by the giving of notice shall commence to run from the date of mailing of such notice. (2) If any return, claim, statement, notice, application, or other document required to be filed, or any payment required to be made, within a prescribed period or on or before a prescribed date under authority of any provision of this article is, after such period or such date, delivered by United States mail to the tax commission, bureau, office, officer or person with which or with whom such document is required to be filed, or to which or to whom such payment is required to be made, the date of the United States postmark stamped on the envelope shall be deemed to be the date of delivery. This subdivision shall apply only if the postmark date falls within the prescribed period or on or before the prescribed date for the filing of such document, or for making the payment, including any extension granted for such filing or payment, and only if such document or payment was deposited in the mail, postage prepaid, properly addressed to the tax commission, bureau, office, officer or person with which or with whom the document is required to be filed or to which or to whom such payment is required to be made. If any document is sent by United States registered mail, such registration shall be prima facie evidence that such document was delivered to the tax commission, bureau, office, officer or person to which or to whom addressed. To the extent that the tax commission shall prescribe by regulation, certified mail may be used in lieu of registered mail under this section. This subdivision shall apply in the case of postmarks not made by the United States Post Office only if and to the extent provided by regulation of the tax commission. (3) When the last day prescribed under authority of this article (including any extension of time) for performing any act falls on Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday in the state of New York, the performance of such act shall be considered timely if it is performed on the next succeeding day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday. (4)(A) Any reference in paragraph two of this subdivision to the United States mail shall be treated as including a reference to any delivery service designated by the secretary of the treasury of the United States pursuant to section seventy-five hundred two of the internal revenue code and any reference in paragraph two of this subdivision to a postmark by the United States mail shall be treated as including a reference to any date recorded or marked in the manner described in section seventy-five hundred two of the internal revenue code by a designated delivery service. If the commissioner finds that any delivery service designated by such secretary is inadequate for the needs of the state, the commissioner may withdraw such designation for purposes of this article. The commissioner may also designate additional delivery services meeting the criteria of section seventy-five hundred two of the internal revenue code for purposes of this article, or may withdraw any such designation if he finds that a delivery service so designated is inadequate for the needs of the state. Any reference in paragraph two of this subdivision to the United States mail shall be treated as including a reference to any delivery service designated by the commissioner and any reference in paragraph two of this subdivision to a postmark by the United States mail shall be treated as including a reference to any date recorded or marked in the manner described in section seventy-five hundred two of the internal revenue code by a delivery service designated by the commissioner. (B) Any equivalent of registered or certified mail designated by the United States secretary of the treasury, or as may be designated by the commissioner pursuant to the same criteria used by such secretary for such designations pursuant to section seventy-five hundred two of the internal revenue code, shall be included within the meaning of registered or certified mail as used in paragraph two of this subdivision. If the commissioner finds that any equivalent of registered or certified mail designated by such secretary or the commissioner is inadequate for the needs of the state, the commissioner may withdraw such designation for purposes of this article. (b) The provisions of the civil practice law and rules or any other law relative to limitations of time for the enforcement of a civil remedy shall not apply to any proceeding or action taken by the state or the tax commission to levy, appraise, assess, determine or enforce the collection of any tax or penalty provided by this article. However, except in the case of a willfully false or fraudulent return with intent to evade the tax no assessment of additional tax shall be made after the expiration of more than three years from the date of the filing of a return; provided, however, that where no return has been filed as provided by law, the tax may be assessed at any time. Where a purchaser furnishes a vendor with a false or fraudulent certificate of resale or other exemption certificate or other document with intent to evade the tax, the tax may be assessed against such purchaser at any time. For purposes of this subdivision, a return filed before the last day prescribed by law or regulation for the filing thereof or before the last day of any extension of time for the filing thereof shall be deemed to be filed on such last day. Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, if the time to assess additional tax would otherwise have expired on or before December nineteenth, nineteen hundred sixty-nine, the time to assess such additional tax is hereby extended to and including December twentieth, nineteen hundred sixty-nine, except that it may be further extended by a taxpayer's consent in writing as provided in subdivision (c) hereof. (c) Where, before the expiration of the period prescribed herein for the assessment of an additional tax, a taxpayer has consented in writing that such period be extended the amount of such additional tax due may be determined at any time within such extended period. The period so extended may be further extended by subsequent consents in writing made before the expiration of the extended period. If a taxpayer has consented in writing to the extension of the period for assessment, the period for filing an application for credit or refund pursuant to section eleven hundred thirty-nine shall not expire prior to six months after the expiration of the period within which an assessment may be made pursuant to the consent to extend the time for assessment of additional tax. (d) The limitation of time for the assessment of additional tax, shall, after the mailing of a notice of determination, be suspended with respect to the amount of additional tax asserted in such notice until the expiration of the time for filing a petition contesting such notice or, if a timely petition with respect to the amount asserted in such notice has been filed with the division of tax appeals, until the determination of the administrative law judge or the decision of the tax appeals tribunal has become final. A determination of an administrative law judge in the division of tax appeals shall become final in accordance with subdivision four of section two thousand ten of this chapter. A decision of the tax appeals tribunal shall become final upon the expiration of the period specified in paragraph four of subdivision (a) of section eleven hundred thirty-eight of this article for making an application for review if no such application has been duly made within such time, or, if such application has been duly made, upon expiration of the time for all further judicial review, or upon the rendering by the tax appeals tribunal of a decision in accordance with the mandate of the court on review. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the purpose of making an application for review, the decision of the tax appeals tribunal shall be deemed final on the date the notice of such decision is served as provided in section two thousand sixteen of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2024 · leading case: Roebling Liquors, Inc. v. Comm'r of Taxation & Fin., 284 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2001).
Roebling Liquors, Inc. v. Comm'r of Taxation & Fin., 284 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2001). “, 144 AD2d 114, 115 ; see, Tax Law § 1147 [a] [1]) and, upon this record, petitioners did not sufficiently rebut that presumption (see, Matter of T.”
Henry Schein, Inc. v. Eristoff, 35 A.D.3d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2006). “During the course of the audit, a dispute arose concerning the validity of petitioner’s consent to extend the statute of limitations with respect to the Department’s ability to assess additional sales and use taxes (see Tax Law § 1147 [c]). In August 2004, pursuant to the…”
Rodriguez v. Tax Appeals Tribunal, 82 A.D.3d 1302 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2011). “earing was held before an Administrative Law Judge who found that the Department had failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner deliberately filed fraudulent tax returns on behalf of the business and any assessment sought to be imposed for additional sales…”
Lake Grove Ent., LLC v. Megna, 81 A.D.3d 1191 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2011). “Finally, we reject petitioner’s arguments that the consents executed by its representatives were ineffective to extend the statute of limitations for the assessment (see Tax Law § 1147 [c]). Peters, Spain, Malone Jr.”
People v. Sprint Nextel Corp., 41 Misc. 3d 511 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013). “” Tax Law § 1147 (b) also imposes a three-year limitations period on tax enforcement actions, “except in the case of a willfully false or fraudulent return with intent to evade the tax.”
T. J. Gulf, Inc. v. New York State Tax Comm'n, 124 A.D.2d 314 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1986). “Following a hearing, respondent determined, inter alia, that the Audit Division had demonstrated that the notice of possible claim had been mailed to petitioner in a properly addressed and stamped envelope, giving rise to a presumption of its receipt by petitioner, and that…”
Diaz v. Tax Appeals Tribunal, 243 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1997). “Tax Law § 1147 (a) (1) provides that the period of time for giving notice “shall commence to run from the date of mailing” of a notice of determination.”
Cavalieri v. Comm'r of the State of New York Dep't of Taxation & Fin., 250 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1998). “Furthermore, petitioners’ assertion of nonreceipt of the notice of determination, without more, does not compel a contrary conclusion given the presumption of receipt which arises under Tax Law § 1147 (a) (1) and the proof of mailing submitted by respondent (see, Matter of T.”
Mareno v. State of New York Tax Comm'n, 144 A.D.2d 114 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1988). “The mailing of a notice of determination of sales tax liability gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of receipt (Tax Law § 1147 [a] [1]; Matter of Ruggerite, Inc.”
Kucherov v. Chu, 147 A.D.2d 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1989). “Petitioner’s challenge is not to the tax as calculated to be due, but to whether a fraud penalty lies and to the right of the Tax Commission, absent fraud, which he asserts has not been clearly and convincingly demonstrated, to collect taxes after expiration of the three-year…”
Adamides v. Chu, 134 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1987). “With the exception of willfully false or fraudulent returns, no assessment for additional tax may be made after the expiration of more than three years from the date of filing a return (Tax Law § 1147 [b]). The taxpayer may, however, consent in writing before the expiration of…”
Halperin v. Chu, 134 Misc. 2d 105 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1986). “That notice was sent to the corporation’s address via certified mail (Tax Law § 1147 [a] [1]). Also, a separate notice of petitioner’s personal liability for the payment of the tax due as the responsible officer of the corporation (Tax Law § 1131 [1]; § 1133 [a]) was sent via…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.