New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Village Law § 2-208 (2026)
Decision to commence village incorporation election
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 2-208 Decision to commence village incorporation election. 1. Within ten days after such hearing is concluded the commission shall determine whether the petition complies with the requirements of this article and shall make and sign a decision as to whether a village incorporation shall proceed to election. The commission's decision shall be based on an evidentiary record consisting of the incorporation petition, the study and all exhibits and certifications required by section 2-202 of this article, and any objections made pursuant to section 2-206 of this article. If the members of the commission cannot agree, the decision shall be deemed to be adverse to the petition. If the decision be adverse to the petition, the decision shall contain a brief statement of the reasons on which the adverse decision is based or the reasons on which the members of the commission determined not to proceed to a village incorporation election. 2. The original copy of the decision, copies of the notice of the hearing together with affidavits of posting and publishing same, the written objections and the minutes of proceedings taken on the hearing including signed testimony shall be filed by the commission within fifteen days after the hearing is concluded, with the town clerk of the same town in which the original copy of the petition was filed and the secretary of the state. Duplicate copies of the said papers shall be filed with the town clerks of all towns in which any part of such territory is located. 3. If no proceeding be instituted to review such decision within thirty days after such filing of the original copy thereof, the decision shall be final and conclusive. In the event that the decision is adverse to the petition, a new proceeding for incorporation may be commenced immediately.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1989–2006 · leading case: Fagelson v. McGowan, 301 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2003).
Fagelson v. McGowan, 301 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2003). “Since the statute of limitations has expired, Finnerty and Savino may not now be joined as parties (see Village Law § 2-208 [2]; § 2-210 [2]; Matter of Marin v Board of Elections of *653 State of N.”
Jones v. Deutsch, 715 F. Supp. 1237 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). “N.Y. Village Law §§ 2-208 , 2-210, 2-222, & 2-224 (McKinney 1973 & Supp.”
Atkins Bros. v. Conroy, 31 A.D.3d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2006). “Furthermore, a proceeding to challenge a supervisor’s determination upholding the legal sufficiency of an incorporation petition must be instituted within 30 days after the filing of the original determination (see Village Law §§ 2-208, 2-210 [2]). In this case, the petitioners’…”
Defreestville Area Neighborhoods Ass'n v. Tazbir, 7 Misc. 3d 412 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2005). “Supervisors are limited to considering only “whether the petition complies with the requirements of [article 2 of the Village Law]” (Village Law § 2-208) and are confined, in the performance of that ministerial function, to a consideration of the objections directed thereto…”
O'Keeffe v. Bonelli, 170 Misc. 2d 218 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1996). “After the hearing upon a petition for incorporation, the supervisor has 10 days within which he or she "shall determine whether the petition complies with the requirements of” the statute and render a written decision (Village Law § 2-208 [1]). Assuming that the decision is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.