New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Workers' Compensation Law § 10 (2026)

Liability for compensation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 10. Liability for compensation. 1. Every employer subject to this
chapter shall in accordance with this chapter, except as otherwise
provided in section twenty-five-a hereof, secure compensation to his
employees and pay or provide compensation for their disability or death
from injury arising out of and in the course of the employment without
regard to fault as a cause of the injury, except that there shall be no
liability for compensation under this chapter when the injury has been
solely occasioned by intoxication from alcohol or a controlled substance
of the injured employee while on duty; or by wilful intention of the
injured employee to bring about the injury or death of himself or
another; or where the injury was sustained in or caused by voluntary
participation in an off-duty athletic activity not constituting part of
the employee's work related duties unless the employer (a) requires the
employee to participate in such activity, (b) compensates the employee
for participating in such activity or (c) otherwise sponsors the
activity.
  2. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, an injury
incurred by an individual currently employed as an emergency medical
technician or an advanced emergency medical technician who is certified
pursuant to section three thousand two of the public health law, while
voluntarily and without expectation of monetary compensation rendering
medical assistance at the scene of an accident shall be deemed to have
arisen out of and in the course of the employment with that emergency
medical technician or advanced emergency medical technician's current
employer.
  3. (a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, where a
public safety worker, including but not limited to a firefighter,
emergency medical technician, police officer, correction officer,
civilian employee of the department of corrections and community
supervision or other person employed by the state to work within a
correctional facility maintained by the department of corrections and
community supervision, driver and medical observer, in the course of
performing his or her duties, is exposed to the blood or other bodily
fluids of another individual or individuals, the executive officer of
the appropriate ambulance, fire or police district may authorize such
public safety worker to obtain the care and treatment, including
diagnosis, recommended medicine and other medical care needed to
ascertain whether such individual was exposed to or contracted any
communicable disease and such care and treatment shall be the
responsibility of the insurance carrier of the appropriate ambulance,
fire or police district or, if a public safety worker was not so exposed
in the course of performing his or her duties for such a district, then
such person shall be covered for the treatment provided for in this
subdivision by the carrier of his or her employer when such person is
acting in the scope of his or her employment. For the purpose of this
subdivision, the term "public safety worker" shall include persons who
act for payment or who act as volunteers in an organized group such as a
rescue squad, police department, correctional facility, ambulance corps,
fire department, or fire company.
  (b) Where a police officer or firefighter subject to section thirty of
this article, or emergency medical technician, paramedic, or other
person certified to provide medical care in emergencies, or emergency
dispatcher files a claim for mental injury premised upon extraordinary
work-related stress incurred in a work-related emergency, the board may
not disallow the claim upon a factual finding that the stress was not
greater than that which usually occurs in the normal work environment.
  (c) The board may not disallow a claim by a covered employee upon a
factual finding that the stress was not greater than that which usually
occurs in the normal work environment where a claim for post-traumatic
stress disorder (PTSD), acute stress disorder or major depressive
disorder resulting from work-related stress is filed upon submission of
medical evidence based on the criteria contained in the version of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in effect on the
date of accident, or as otherwise adopted by the board, provided that
such adoption shall be no more stringent than the current or immediately
preceding version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders. Such covered employee must demonstrate that such disorder
arose out of extraordinary work-related stress attributable to a
distinct work-related event or events directly related to the employment
and occurring during the performance of the employee's job duties.
  (d) Nothing in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this subdivision shall apply
to a claim for mental injury due to a work-related physical injury.
  4. Any person incarcerated upon conviction of a felony shall be deemed
ineligible for all benefits provided under this chapter. All those whose
benefits have ceased by operation of this section, may apply to the
board for benefits upon their release from custody pursuant to
regulation of the board.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56 cases (33 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Claim of Richardson v. Fiedler Roofing, Inc., 493 N.E.2d 228 (NY 1986).
Claim of Richardson v. Fiedler Roofing, Inc., 493 N.E.2d 228 (NY 1986). · cites it 8× “They claim that the employer *249 should not be required to pay benefits because decedent was actually engaged in a theft at the time of his accident, and thus his death resulted not from his work duties, but from "decedent's purely personal act of stealing copper down-spouts.”
Matter of Reith v. City of Albany, 2021 NY Slip Op 07339 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). · cites it 4× “Upon administrative review, the Workers' Compensation Board disallowed the claim, finding that the 2017 amendment to Workers' Compensation Law § 10 (3) did not apply and, further, that claimant's medical proof was insufficient to establish that he sustained a causally-related…”
Matter of McGee v. Johnson Equip. Sales & Serv., 2020 NY Slip Op 3165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). · cites it 2× “An employee is generally entitled to workers' compensation benefits as the result of an injury arising out of and in the course of his or her employment ( see Workers' Compensation Law § 10 [1]). Notwithstanding, benefits shall not be awarded in instances when the injury "has…”
Matter of Pernice v. Harlan Elec. Co., 2023 NY Slip Op 02915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). · cites it 4× “The employer and its workers' compensation carrier (hereinafter collectively referred to as the carrier) controverted the claim based upon, as is pertinent here, claimant's admission that he had also consumed alcohol at lunch in contravention of the employer's policies ( see…”
Matter of Johnson (New York City Tr. Auth.), 2020 NY Slip Op 2521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). “An injury is compensable only where it "aris[es] out of and in the course of the employment" (Workers' Compensation Law § 2 [7]; see Workers' Compensation Law § 10 [1]; Matter of Brennan v New York State Dept.”
Matter of Gaspard v. Queens Party Hall Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 07652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). “"[A]n injury is compensable only where it 'aris[es] out of and in the course of the employment'" ( Matter of Scriven v Davis Ulmer Sprinkler Co.”
Matter of Banish v. Warren Cnty. Sheriff's Off., 2022 NY Slip Op 05570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “The Board affirmed, adopting the WCLJ's findings and decision, and claimant's subsequent application for reconsideration and/or full Board review was denied.”
Matter of Lewandowski v. Safeway Envtl. Corp., 2021 NY Slip Op 00072 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). “We are not persuaded by claimant's arguments. Initially, although the Board, in its September 2016 decision, did not expressly decree that the claim for COPD was disallowed, it clearly found that there was no causally-related COPD.”
Ortega v. 669 Meeker Ave., LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op 00570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). “"'[T]he receipt of workers' compensation benefits is the exclusive remedy that a worker may obtain against an employer for losses suffered as a result of an injury sustained in the course of employment'" ( Alfonso v Pacific Classon Realty, LLC , 101 AD3d 768, 769 , quoting…”
Matter of Timperio v. Bronx-Lebanon Hosp., 2022 NY Slip Op 00711 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “Turning to the compensability of the claim, "[a]n injury is only compensable under the Workers' Compensation Law if it arose out of and in the course of a worker's employment" ( Matter of Warner v New York City Tr.”
Matter of Espinoza v. City Saf. Compliance Corp., 2023 NY Slip Op 05172 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). “An employee's injury is compensable only if it "aris[es] out of and in the course of employment" (Workers' Compensation Law § 2 [7]; see Workers' Compensation Law § 10 [1]).”
Matter of Scriven v. Davis Ulmer Sprinkler Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 2847 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). “The Board panel subsequently disallowed the claim, finding that claimant's injuries were not compensable because they did not arise out of and in the course of his employment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.