Determining specificity of industrial code regulations for section 241 claims
Also stated as: Determining class certification under code section 382
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining specificity of industrial code regulations for section 241 claims
Ranked by how often New York courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
New York opinions citing these pages
- Shantz v. Barry Steel Fabrication, Inc., 207 A.D.3d 1169 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2022)
- Holly v. Cnty. of Chautauqua, 63 A.D.3d 1558 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2009)
- Ragone v. Spring Scaffolding, Inc., 46 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2007)
- Rivera v. Ambassador Fuel & Oil Burner Corp., 45 A.D.3d 275 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2007)
- Fura v. Adam's Rib Ranch Corp., 15 A.D.3d 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2005)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 32 opinions
- 8 opinions
- 22 opinions
Filed under: Class Action Certification Requirements and Review
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law