NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-117 (2026)

Fraudulent and deceptive advertising

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Oct. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 14 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association, with intent to sell or in anywise to dispose of merchandise, securities, service or any other thing offered by such person, firm, corporation or association, directly or indirectly, to the public for sale or distribution, or with intent to increase the consumption thereof, or to induce the public in any manner to enter into any obligation relating thereto, or to acquire title thereto, or an interest therein, to make public, disseminate, circulate or place before the public or cause directly or indirectly to be made, published, disseminated, circulated or placed before the public in this State, in a newspaper or other publication, or in the form of a book, notice, handbill, poster, bill, circular, pamphlet or letter, or in any other way, an advertisement of any sort regarding merchandise, securities, service or any other thing so offered to the public, which advertisement contains any assertion, representation or statement of fact which is untrue, deceptive or misleading:  Provided, that such advertising shall be done willfully and with intent to mislead.  Any person who shall violate the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor. (1915, c. 218; C.S., s. 4290; 1993, c. 539, s. 59; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c).)

 

§ 14-117.1:  Repealed by Session Laws 1994, Ex.  Sess., c. 14, s. 72(5).

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Hart v. First Oak Wealth Mgmt., LLC, 2022 NCBC 41 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2022).
Hart v. First Oak Wealth Mgmt., LLC, 2022 NCBC 41 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2022). “] § 14-117 [and] violations of the North Carolina Investment Advisers Act .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.