NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 58-40-1 (2026)

Purposes

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Oct. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 58 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The purposes of this Article are

(1) To promote the public welfare by regulating rates to the end that they shall not be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory;

(2) To authorize the existence and operation of qualified statistical organizations and require that specified services of the organizations be generally available to all admitted insurers;

(3) To encourage, as the most effective way to produce rates that conform to the standards of subsection (1) of this section, independent action by and reasonable price competition among insurers;

(4) To authorize cooperative action among insurers in the rate-making process, and to regulate such cooperation in order to prevent practices that tend to bring about monopoly or to lessen or destroy competition; and

(5) To encourage the most efficient and economic marketing practices. (1977, c. 828, s. 2; 2005-210, s. 2.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1998–1998 · leading case: Wysong & Miles Co. v. Employers of Wausau, 4 F. Supp. 2d 421 (M.D.N.C. 1998).
Wysong & Miles Co. v. Employers of Wausau, 4 F. Supp. 2d 421 (M.D.N.C. 1998). · cites it 3× “§ 58-40-1(1), might be read to suggest that North Carolina’s filing requirements are designed to protect those who rely on the filed information, a more complete reading of the Article reveals that the specific purpose of requiring filings is to allow the Commissioner to…”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 58-40-1(1): 1 case
Wysong & Miles Co. v. Employers of Wausau, 4 F. Supp. 2d 421 (M.D.N.C. 1998). “§ 58-40-1(1), might be read to suggest that North Carolina’s filing requirements are designed to protect those who rely on the filed information, a more complete reading of the Article reveals that the specific purpose of requiring filings is to allow the Commissioner to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.