NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-1 (2026)
Short title
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Oct. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 62
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Public Utilities Act. (1963, c. 1165, s. 1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1966–2026 · leading case: Shepard v. Bonita Vista Props., LP, 664 S.E.2d 388 (N.C. Ct. App. 2008).
Shepard v. Bonita Vista Props., LP, 664 S.E.2d 388 (N.C. Ct. App. 2008). “N.C. Gen.Stat. §§ 62-1 to -333 (2005). Plaintiffs also set forth a claim for money owed for the value of the propane which Plaintiffs purchased but which remained in the campground's propane tanks.”
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Carolina Power & Light Co., 614 S.E.2d 281 (N.C. 2005). “Before we begin our analysis of the issues raised in this appeal, we review the relationship between North Carolina’s Public Utilities Act, N.C.G.S. §§ 62-1 to -333 (2003), and the FPA.”
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Thornburg, 342 S.E.2d 28 (N.C. 1986). “With regard to the Attorney General’s contention that the inclusion of the additional CWIP was not necessary to CP&L’s financial stability, our first task is to ascertain the meaning of the phrase “necessary to the financial stability of the utility.”
North Carolina Utils. Comm'n v. United States, 253 F. Supp. 930 (E.D.N.C. 1966). “[4] that certain shipments by truck of iron and steel products from the port at Wilmington, North Carolina, to other cities in North Carolina are in foreign commerce and hence subject to regulation by the I.C.”
Duke Power Co. v. City of High Point, 205 S.E.2d 774 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974). “G.S. 62-1, et seq. It appears that defendants do not question this conclusion.”
Vill. of Bald Head Island v. Bald Head Island Transp., No. 23-424 (N.C. Ct. App. Oct. 15, 2024). “§ 62- 3(23)(c) (2023) (including within the definition of “public utility” “all persons affiliated through stock ownership with a public utility doing business in this State as a parent or subsidiary corporation to such an extent that the Commission shall find that such…”
State ex rel. N.C. Utils. Comm'n v. Carolina Indus. Grp. for Fair Util. Rates III, No. 139A24 (N.C. May 22, 2026). “at 693, not supported by -97- “substantial evidence in the record as a whole,” Public Staff III, 331 N.”
State ex rel. N.C. Utils. Comm'n v. Carolina Indus. Grp. for Fair Util. Rates II, No. 75A24 (N.C. May 22, 2026). “at 693, not supported by -97- “substantial evidence in the record as a whole,” Public Staff III, 331 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.