N.C. Gen. Stat. » Chapter 66
NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-311 (2026)

Short title

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Oct. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 66 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This Article may be cited as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. (2000-152, s. 1.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2010–2022 · leading case: Powell v. City of Newton, 703 S.E.2d 723 (N.C. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Powell v. City of Newton, 703 S.E.2d 723 (N.C. 2010). · cites it 6× “The majority went on to hold that, in any event, the agreement was signed electronically because the e-mail exchange between the attorneys that followed the in-court agreement satisfied the requirements of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, N.C.G.S. §§ 66-311 to -330…”
Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker, 786 S.E.2d 200 (W. Va. 2016). “2009); N.C. Gen.Stat. §§ 66-311 to -339 (2009); N.”
Mitchell v. Boswell, 851 S.E.2d 646 (N.C. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 3× “§ 25-2-201(1) (2019) (“signed by the party against whom 4 We recognize the increased use of virtual and telephonic attendance at settlement conferences.”
Mitchell v. Boswell, 851 S.E.2d 646 (N.C. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 3× “§ 25-2-201(1) (2019) (“signed by the party against whom 4 We recognize the increased use of virtual and telephonic attendance at settlement conferences.”
Futures Grp., Inc. v. Brosnan, 2022 NCBC 79 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2022). · cites it 3× “Among other things, the Act provides that “[a] record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.” N.”
Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker, No. 16-0228 (W. Va. Apr. 19, 2016). “2009); N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 66-311 to -339 (2009); N.”
Mystic Retreat Med Spa & Weight Loss Ctr. v. Zeltiq Aesthetics LLC, No. 1:21-cv-00515 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 2022). “Article § 66-311 et. seq.)). Plaintiffs further contend that their claims against the Allergan Defendants must proceed because the arbitration clause is not incorporated into the signed MSA Sales Order, as there is a lack of mutual assent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.