NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-60 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 75 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This Article shall be known and may be cited as the "Identity Theft Protection Act". (2005-414, s. 1.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2017–2025 · leading case: Rogers v. Keffer, Inc., 243 F. Supp. 3d 650 (E.D.N.C. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rogers v. Keffer, Inc., 243 F. Supp. 3d 650 (E.D.N.C. 2017). · cites it 2× “Count three alleges that Chase, SunTrust, Keffer, and the CRAs violated the North Carolina Identity Theft Protection Act (“NCITPÁ”), N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 75-60 et seq. Id. ¶¶ 180-202 .”

Trimble v. AT&T Mobility, LLC (W.D.N.C. 2023). · cites it 2× “, and violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-60 . (Id. ¶ 83-185).”

Rhodes v. Navy Fed. Credit Union (E.D.N.C. 2025). · cites it 2× “The statutory section cited by plaintiff sets out definitions applicable to North Carolina’s Identity Theft Protection Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§75-60 et seq. Although that act does create certain causes of action, none address false credit reports.”

Seifert v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (E.D.N.C. 2022). “Accordingly, in order to state a claim for violation of the North Carolina Debt Collection Practices Act, once the threshold definitional requirements in § 75-60 are satisfied, a claim for unfair debt collection practices must meet the three requirements for a claim under § 75–1.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.