N.C. Gen. Stat. » Chapter 9
NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 9-7 (2026)

Notation on master jury list of names of jurors who have served; retention

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Oct. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 9 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The names of persons summoned for jury service and the date or dates on which each person served shall be noted on the master jury list. This information shall be retained for two years, and persons shall be exempt from jury service for a period of two years from the date on which they were discharged from their prior service, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section.

(b) The names of persons summoned for jury service who served a full term on the grand jury pursuant to G.S. 15A-622, the date or dates on which each person served, and a notation that the person served the full term of service as a grand juror shall be noted on the master list. This information shall be retained for six years, and persons shall be exempt from jury service for a period of six years from the date on which they were discharged from their prior service. (1967, c. 218, s. 1; 2012-180, s. 8; 2013-148, s. 2.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1964–1993 · leading case: Delta Marine, Inc. v. Whaley, 813 F. Supp. 414 (E.D.N.C. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Delta Marine, Inc. v. Whaley, 813 F. Supp. 414 (E.D.N.C. 1993). · cites it 2× “White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 9-7 at 466. The warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is narrower and more precise.”
Coffer v. Stand. Brands, Inc., 226 S.E.2d 534 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976). “See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A, comment i, k (1965). Thus, the facts of plaintiff’s case do not appear consistent with a strict liability theory.”
State v. Wilson, 137 S.E.2d 109 (N.C. 1964). “9-4) no scroll drawn may be discarded except pursuant to G.S. 9-7. The right of rejection for want of good moral character or sufficient intelligence is available only to the commissioners when the list is being prepared.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.