From and after July 1, 1957, it shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, association, or other business entity in this State to act as a real estate broker, or directly or indirectly to engage or assume to engage in the business of real estate broker or to advertise or hold himself or herself or themselves out as engaging in or conducting such business without first obtaining a license issued by the North Carolina Real Estate Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission), under the provisions of this Chapter. A license shall be obtained from the Commission even if the person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, association, or business entity is licensed in another state and is affiliated or otherwise associated with a licensed real estate broker in this State. (1957, c. 744, s. 1; 1969, c. 191, s. 1; 1983, c. 81, ss. 1, 2; 1995, c. 351, s. 19; 1999-229, s. 1; 2005-395, s. 1.)
Notes of Decisions
Furr v. Fonville Morisey Realty, Inc., 503 S.E.2d 401 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 4× “in this State to act as a real estate broker or real estate salesman, or directly or indirectly to engage or assume to engage in the business of real estate broker or real estate salesman or to advertise or hold himself or themselves out as engaging in or conducting such…”
Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co., 532 S.E.2d 215 (N.C. Ct. App. 2000).
· cites it 2× “*620 We have noted defendants’ arguments with respect to the illegality of the alleged contract which underlies this action due to plaintiff Bruggeman’s failure to hold a North Carolina real estate license as required by G.S. § 93A-1. Because this argument is more properly…”
Scheerer v. Fisher, 688 S.E.2d 472 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “0104(a) (2008). This regulation was passed pursuant to the enabling legislation in N.”
Davis v. Sellers, 443 S.E.2d 879 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 2× “G.S. 93A-1 provides that it is unlawful for any person to act as a real estate broker or real estate salesperson or to directly or indirectly engage in the business of being a real estate broker or real estate salesperson without a license issued by the North Carolina Real…”
Gower v. Strout Realty, Inc., 289 S.E.2d 880 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 2× “It thus appears that defendant and the trial court relied on the principle of law that the co-brokerage or commission sharing agreement between plaintiffs and defendant as alleged was in violation of the Real Estate License Law, Chapter 93A of the General Statutes, and invalid…”
McArver v. Gerukos, 144 S.E.2d 277 (N.C. 1965).
· cites it 2× “The sole question, therefore, is whether the contract so alleged and shown is unenforceable by the plaintiff for the reason that when it was made and performed he did not have a license as a real estate broker or salesman pursuant to Chapter 93A of the General Statutes, the…”
Carver v. Lykes, 137 S.E.2d 139 (N.C. 1964).
“It also provides that upon the filing of a written, verified complaint which makes out a prima facie case of such misconduct, the Board shall, after due notice, hold a hearing and investigate the actions of the realtor whose conduct has been called into question.”
State v. Clemmons, 433 S.E.2d 748 (N.C. Ct. App. 1993).
“”); G.S. 93A-1 (“[I]t shall be unlawful for any person .”
Gaston Bd. of Realtors, Inc. v. Harrison, 306 S.E.2d 809 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 2× “G.S. 93A-1 et seq. Defendant next contends the trial court erred in denying defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss without making findings of fact.”
In Re Dillingham, 127 S.E.2d 584 (N.C. 1962).
“The words “any of the acts mentioned herein” are not characterized by phrasal felicity or clarity, but they must mean, as the Iowa Court said in construing identical words in their Real Estate and Salesmen Act, the acts of a real estate broker or real estate salesman for which a…”
McAlister v. Hunter, 634 F. Supp. 2d 577 (W.D.N.C. 2009).
· cites it 3× “” N.C.G.S. § 93A-1. 4 Thus, the arrangement in this case is not one that is sanctioned by the North Carolina real estate laws.”
Koger Props., Inc. v. Lowe, 416 S.E.2d 585 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 2× “Such a “finder’s fee” contract would not be a violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-1 (1989) since defendant was licensed as a broker in North Carolina.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.