NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6 (2026)

Disciplinary action by Commission

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 93A CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Commission has power to take disciplinary action. Upon its own initiative, or on the complaint of any person, the Commission may investigate the actions of any person or entity licensed under this Chapter, or any other person or entity who shall assume to act in such capacity. If the Commission finds probable cause that a licensee has violated any of the provisions of this Chapter, the Commission may hold a hearing on the allegations of misconduct.

The Commission has power to suspend or revoke at any time a license issued under the provisions of this Chapter, or to reprimand or censure any licensee, if, following a hearing, the Commission adjudges the licensee to be guilty of:

(1) Making any willful or negligent misrepresentation or any willful or negligent omission of material fact.

(2) Making any false promises of a character likely to influence, persuade, or induce.

(3) Pursuing a course of misrepresentation or making of false promises through agents, advertising or otherwise.

(4) Acting for more than one party in a transaction without the knowledge of all parties for whom he or she acts.

(5) Accepting a commission or valuable consideration as a real estate broker on provisional status for the performance of any of the acts specified in this Article or Article 4 of this Chapter, from any person except his or her broker-in-charge or licensed broker by whom he or she is employed.

(6) Representing or attempting to represent a real estate broker other than the broker by whom he or she is engaged or associated, without the express knowledge and consent of the broker with whom he or she is associated.

(7) Failing, within a reasonable time, to account for or to remit any monies coming into his or her possession which belong to others.

(8) Being unworthy or incompetent to act as a real estate broker in a manner as to endanger the interest of the public.

(9) Paying a commission or valuable consideration to any person for acts or services performed in violation of this Chapter.

(10) Any other conduct which constitutes improper, fraudulent or dishonest dealing.

(11) Performing or undertaking to perform any legal service, as set forth in G.S. 84-2.1, or any other acts constituting the practice of law.

(12) Commingling the money or other property of his or her principals with his or her own or failure to maintain and deposit in a trust or escrow account in a bank as provided by subsection (g) of this section all money received by him or her as a real estate licensee acting in that capacity, or an escrow agent, or the custodian or manager of the funds of another person or entity which relate to or concern that person's or entity's interest or investment in real property, provided, these accounts shall not bear interest unless the principals authorize in writing the deposit be made in an interest bearing account and also provide for the disbursement of the interest accrued.

(13) Failing to deliver, within a reasonable time, a completed copy of any purchase agreement or offer to buy and sell real estate to the buyer and to the seller.

(14) Failing, at the time a sales transaction is consummated, to deliver to the broker's client a detailed and accurate closing statement showing the receipt and disbursement of all monies relating to the transaction about which the broker knows or reasonably should know. If a closing statement is prepared by an attorney or lawful settlement agent, a broker may rely on the delivery of that statement, but the broker must review the statement for accuracy and notify all parties to the closing of any errors.

(15) Violating any rule adopted by the Commission.

(b) The Commission may suspend or revoke any license issued under the provisions of this Chapter or reprimand or censure any licensee when:

(1) The licensee has obtained a license by false or fraudulent representation;

(2) The licensee has been convicted or has entered a plea of guilty or no contest upon which final judgment is entered by a court of competent jurisdiction in this State, or any other state, of any misdemeanor or felony that involves false swearing, misrepresentation, deceit, extortion, theft, bribery, embezzlement, false pretenses, fraud, forgery, larceny, misappropriation of funds or property, perjury, or any other offense showing professional unfitness or involving moral turpitude which would reasonably affect the licensee's performance in the real estate business;

(3) The licensee has violated any of the provisions of G.S. 93A-6(a) when selling, leasing, or buying the licensee's own property;

(4) The broker's unlicensed employee, who is exempt from the provisions of this Chapter under G.S. 93A-2(c)(6), has committed, in the regular course of business, any act which, if committed by the broker, would constitute a violation of G.S. 93A-6(a) for which the broker could be disciplined; or

(5) The licensee, who is also licensed as an appraiser, attorney, home inspector, mortgage broker, general contractor, or member of another licensed profession or occupation, has been disciplined for an offense under any law involving fraud, theft, misrepresentation, breach of trust or fiduciary responsibility, or willful or negligent malpractice.

(c) The Commission may appear in its own name in superior court in actions for injunctive relief to prevent any person from violating the provisions of this Chapter or rules adopted by the Commission. The superior court shall have the power to grant these injunctions even if criminal prosecution has been or may be instituted as a result of the violations, or whether the person is a licensee of the Commission.

(d) Each broker shall maintain complete records showing the deposit, maintenance, and withdrawal of money or other property owned by the broker's principals or held in escrow or in trust for the broker's principals. The Commission may inspect these records periodically, without prior notice and may also inspect these records whenever the Commission determines that they are pertinent to an investigation of any specific complaint against a licensee.

(e) When a person or entity licensed under this Chapter is accused of any act, omission, or misconduct which would subject the licensee to disciplinary action, the licensee, with the consent and approval of the Commission, may surrender the license and all the rights and privileges pertaining to it for a period of time established by the Commission. A person or entity who surrenders a license shall not thereafter be eligible for or submit any application for licensure as a real estate broker during the period of license surrender.

(f) In any contested case in which the Commission takes disciplinary action authorized by any provision of this Chapter, the Commission may also impose reasonable conditions, restrictions, and limitations upon the license, registration, or approval issued to the disciplined person or entity. In any contested case concerning an application for licensure, time share project registration, or school, sponsor, instructor, or course approval, the Commission may impose reasonable conditions, restrictions, and limitations on any license, registration, or approval it may issue as a part of its final decision.

(g) A broker's trust or escrow account shall be a demand deposit account in a federally insured depository institution lawfully doing business in this State which agrees to make its records of the broker's account available for inspection by the Commission's representatives.

(h) The Executive Director shall transmit a certified copy of all final orders of the Commission suspending or revoking licenses issued under this Chapter to the clerk of superior court of the county in which the licensee maintains his or her principal place of business. The clerk shall enter the order upon the judgment docket of the county. (1957, c. 744, s. 6; 1967, c. 281, s. 4; c. 853, s. 3; 1969, c. 191, s. 5; 1971, c. 86, s. 2; 1973, c. 1112; c. 1331, s. 3; 1975, c. 28; 1979, c. 616, ss. 6, 7; 1981, c. 682, s. 15; 1983, c. 81, s. 13; 1987, c. 516, ss. 1, 2; 1989, c. 563, s. 2; 1993, c. 419, s. 10; 1999-229, s. 6; 2000-149, s. 19(b); 2001-487, s. 23(b); 2002-168, s. 5; 2005-374, s. 2; 2005-395, s. 9; 2011-217, s. 6.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1962–2021 · leading case: Watson v. North Carolina Real Est. Comm'n, 362 S.E.2d 294 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987).
Watson v. North Carolina Real Est. Comm'n, 362 S.E.2d 294 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 26× “The Commission entered the following conclusions: (1) Respondent is adjudged guilty of violating GS 93A-6 (a)(10) by engaging in improper and dishonest dealing for his conduct with regard to the altered tapes.”
John v. Robbins, 764 F. Supp. 379 (M.D.N.C. 1991). · cites it 30× “See N.C.Gen.Stat. § 93A-6(a) (1989). A state administrative agency thus invokes Section 93A-6(a)(4) pursuant to the performance of a judicial function.”
State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019). · cites it 2× “Thus, while recidivist sex offenders have a somewhat greater expectation of privacy than a probationer or parolee, they do not have the same expectations of privacy as members of the general public in light of their prior offenses.”
Parrish v. North Carolina Real Est. Licensing Bd., 254 S.E.2d 268 (N.C. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 13× “” The letter indicated that the stated facts, if found to be true would constitute violations of G.S. 93A-6(a)(1), (4) and (10).”
In Re Dillingham, 127 S.E.2d 584 (N.C. 1962). · cites it 10× “G.S. 93A-6, (b), of this Act as codified specifically prescribes that when The Board suspends or revokes a license, the licensee shall have the right to appeal within a fixed time to the superior court, “where he shall be entitled to a trial de novo.”
United States v. Nathan Wolf, 860 F.3d 175 (4th Cir. 2017). “See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(l)&(10). In light of these obligations, we conclude that Wolfs duties and responsibilities towards a lender in connection with a real *201 estate transaction are akin to fiduciary-duties.”
Clouse v. Gordon, 445 S.E.2d 428 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs contend, however, that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(1) imposed a duty on French to conduct an independent survey of the federal flood hazard maps.”
McDonald v. Skeen, 567 S.E.2d 209 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “In the instant case, McDonald claims Skeen breached his contract with him in that Skeen: (1) violated N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(4) by acting as an agent for more than one party, (2) violated duties of loyalty and consent owed to McDonald; and (3) did not disclose that he was an…”
Edwards v. Latham, 299 S.E.2d 819 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 14× “G.S. § 93A-6(a). Ms. Edwards was found guilty of violating three separate provisions of the real estate licensing law, which the Board termed “improper and dishonest dealing, being unworthy to act as a real estate broker, and making willful and substantial misrepresentations”…”
Elliott v. North Carolina Psychology Bd., 498 S.E.2d 616 (N.C. 1998). · cites it 3× “2d 584 (1962), this Court discussed N.C.G.S. § 93A-6(a), which authorizes the North Carolina Real Estate Licensing Board to hold a hearing and to revoke or suspend the license of a real estate broker or a real estate salesman.”
Scheerer v. Fisher, 688 S.E.2d 472 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “See also N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(15) (2007) (stating that the Commission has the power to suspend or revoke a license, or reprimand or censure a licensee if, after a hearing, the Commission finds the licensee guilty of “[violating any rule or regulation promulgated by the…”
Carver v. Lykes, 137 S.E.2d 139 (N.C. 1964). · cites it 2× “It also provides that upon the filing of a written, verified complaint which makes out a prima facie case of such misconduct, the Board shall, after due notice, hold a hearing and investigate the actions of the realtor whose conduct has been called into question.”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(15): 1 case
Scheerer v. Fisher, 688 S.E.2d 472 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010). “See also N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(15) (2007) (stating that the Commission has the power to suspend or revoke a license, or reprimand or censure a licensee if, after a hearing, the Commission finds the licensee guilty of “[violating any rule or regulation promulgated by the…”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(9): 1 case
McArver v. Gerukos, 144 S.E.2d 277 (N.C. 1965).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a): 7 cases
Watson v. North Carolina Real Est. Comm'n, 362 S.E.2d 294 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987). “The Commission entered the following conclusions: (1) Respondent is adjudged guilty of violating GS 93A-6 (a)(10) by engaging in improper and dishonest dealing for his conduct with regard to the altered tapes.”
Elliott v. North Carolina Psychology Bd., 498 S.E.2d 616 (N.C. 1998). “2d 584 (1962), this Court discussed N.C.G.S. § 93A-6(a), which authorizes the North Carolina Real Estate Licensing Board to hold a hearing and to revoke or suspend the license of a real estate broker or a real estate salesman.”
John v. Robbins, 764 F. Supp. 379 (M.D.N.C. 1991). “See N.C.Gen.Stat. § 93A-6(a) (1989). A state administrative agency thus invokes Section 93A-6(a)(4) pursuant to the performance of a judicial function.”
Edwards v. Latham, 299 S.E.2d 819 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983). “G.S. § 93A-6(a). Ms. Edwards was found guilty of violating three separate provisions of the real estate licensing law, which the Board termed “improper and dishonest dealing, being unworthy to act as a real estate broker, and making willful and substantial misrepresentations”…”
Cummings v. Carroll, 866 S.E.2d 675 (N.C. 2021).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(1): 3 cases
Clouse v. Gordon, 445 S.E.2d 428 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). “Plaintiffs contend, however, that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(1) imposed a duty on French to conduct an independent survey of the federal flood hazard maps.”
Parrish v. North Carolina Real Est. Licensing Bd., 254 S.E.2d 268 (N.C. Ct. App. 1979). “” The letter indicated that the stated facts, if found to be true would constitute violations of G.S. 93A-6(a)(1), (4) and (10).”
Stevens v. Heller, No. 19-344 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2019).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(10): 4 cases
Watson v. North Carolina Real Est. Comm'n, 362 S.E.2d 294 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987). “The Commission entered the following conclusions: (1) Respondent is adjudged guilty of violating GS 93A-6 (a)(10) by engaging in improper and dishonest dealing for his conduct with regard to the altered tapes.”
Edwards v. Latham, 299 S.E.2d 819 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983). “G.S. § 93A-6(a). Ms. Edwards was found guilty of violating three separate provisions of the real estate licensing law, which the Board termed “improper and dishonest dealing, being unworthy to act as a real estate broker, and making willful and substantial misrepresentations”…”
Henkel v. Triangle Homes, Inc., 790 S.E.2d 602 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016).
Correll v. Boulware, 329 S.E.2d 695 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(15): 2 cases
Prop. Shop, Inc. v. Mountain City Inv. Co., 290 S.E.2d 222 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982).
McAlister v. Hunter, 634 F. Supp. 2d 577 (W.D.N.C. 2009).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(2): 1 case
Watson v. North Carolina Real Est. Comm'n, 362 S.E.2d 294 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987). “The Commission entered the following conclusions: (1) Respondent is adjudged guilty of violating GS 93A-6 (a)(10) by engaging in improper and dishonest dealing for his conduct with regard to the altered tapes.”
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(4): 5 cases
John v. Robbins, 764 F. Supp. 379 (M.D.N.C. 1991). “See N.C.Gen.Stat. § 93A-6(a) (1989). A state administrative agency thus invokes Section 93A-6(a)(4) pursuant to the performance of a judicial function.”
McDonald v. Skeen, 567 S.E.2d 209 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002). “In the instant case, McDonald claims Skeen breached his contract with him in that Skeen: (1) violated N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(4) by acting as an agent for more than one party, (2) violated duties of loyalty and consent owed to McDonald; and (3) did not disclose that he was an…”
Abernathy v. Ralph Squires Realty Co., Inc., 285 S.E.2d 325 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982).
Correll v. Boulware, 329 S.E.2d 695 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985).
Bdm Invs. v. Lenhil, Inc., 2014 NCBC 6 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2014).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(7): 1 case
Frieson v. North Carolina Real Est. Licensing Bd., 325 S.E.2d 293 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(8): 5 cases
Watson v. North Carolina Real Est. Comm'n, 362 S.E.2d 294 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987). “The Commission entered the following conclusions: (1) Respondent is adjudged guilty of violating GS 93A-6 (a)(10) by engaging in improper and dishonest dealing for his conduct with regard to the altered tapes.”
Parrish v. North Carolina Real Est. Licensing Bd., 254 S.E.2d 268 (N.C. Ct. App. 1979). “” The letter indicated that the stated facts, if found to be true would constitute violations of G.S. 93A-6(a)(1), (4) and (10).”
Edwards v. Latham, 299 S.E.2d 819 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983). “G.S. § 93A-6(a). Ms. Edwards was found guilty of violating three separate provisions of the real estate licensing law, which the Board termed “improper and dishonest dealing, being unworthy to act as a real estate broker, and making willful and substantial misrepresentations”…”
Correll v. Boulware, 329 S.E.2d 695 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985).
North Carolina Real Est. Licensing Bd. v. Woodard, 219 S.E.2d 271 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(9): 1 case
Davis v. Sellers, 443 S.E.2d 879 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(l): 5 cases
United States v. Nathan Wolf, 860 F.3d 175 (4th Cir. 2017). “See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(a)(l)&(10). In light of these obligations, we conclude that Wolfs duties and responsibilities towards a lender in connection with a real *201 estate transaction are akin to fiduciary-duties.”
Watson v. North Carolina Real Est. Comm'n, 362 S.E.2d 294 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987). “The Commission entered the following conclusions: (1) Respondent is adjudged guilty of violating GS 93A-6 (a)(10) by engaging in improper and dishonest dealing for his conduct with regard to the altered tapes.”
Edwards v. Latham, 299 S.E.2d 819 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983). “G.S. § 93A-6(a). Ms. Edwards was found guilty of violating three separate provisions of the real estate licensing law, which the Board termed “improper and dishonest dealing, being unworthy to act as a real estate broker, and making willful and substantial misrepresentations”…”
North Carolina Real Est. Licensing Bd. v. Gallman, 277 S.E.2d 853 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981).
Correll v. Boulware, 329 S.E.2d 695 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985).
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6(b)(2): 3 cases
State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019). “Thus, while recidivist sex offenders have a somewhat greater expectation of privacy than a probationer or parolee, they do not have the same expectations of privacy as members of the general public in light of their prior offenses.”
State v. Hilton, 862 S.E.2d 806 (N.C. 2021).
State v. Hilton, 862 S.E.2d 806 (N.C. 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.