Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 101
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 101.52 (2026)

Responsibility for printing

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
March 9, 1999
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 649 - 122nd General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The clerk of the senate and the clerk of the house of representatives are custodians of the documents in possession of the senate or house of representatives, and are responsible for the printing of a document when its printing becomes necessary in the course of the proceedings or operations of the clerk's respective house. The clerk shall discharge this responsibility for printing, whether for a particular document or for a particular class of documents, by printing the document internally in the clerk's office, by contracting with a private printer outside the clerk's office, by participating in the public printing services provided by the department of administrative services, or by requesting the director of administrative services to let a contract for the printing. In choosing among these methods of printing a document or class of documents, the clerk shall not select a method unless it reasonably appears under the circumstances that the method will enable the clerk successfully and efficiently to discharge the clerk's responsibility for printing the document or class of documents.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2024 · leading case: State v. Wilson, 673 N.E.2d 1347 (Ohio 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Wilson, 673 N.E.2d 1347 (Ohio 1997). · cites it 4× “Here, to determine the meaning of the term “existing sections,” we refer to the form of a legislative enactment as prescribed by R.C. 101.52. That section requires a bill to be printed for enrollment 4 in the exact language in which it was passed, with “[n]ew matter * * *…”
Stevens v. Ackman, 91 Ohio St. 3d 182 (2001). “R.C. 101.52 (now R.C. 101.53) provides devices for showing changes in context in the printed bill or act: matter to be deleted is shown struck through, and new matter to be inserted is shown in capital letters.”
State v. Wilson, 77 Ohio St. 3d 334 (1997). · cites it 4× “Here, to determine the meaning of the term “existing sections,” we refer to the form of a legislative enactment as prescribed by R.C. 101.52. That section requires a bill to be printed for enrollment4 in the exact language in which it was passed, with “[n]ew matter *** indicated…”
Stevens v. Ackman, 91 Ohio St. 3d 182 (2001). “R.C. 101.52 (now R.C. 101.53) provides devices for showing changes in context in the printed bill or act: matter to be deleted is shown struck through, and new matter to be inserted is shown in capital letters.”
State v. S.R.S., 2024-Ohio-2195, 244 N.E.3d 1272. · cites it 4× “R.C. 101.52. The legislature outlines what it intends to repeal by compliance with R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.