Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 119 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03 (2026)

Procedure for adoption, amendment, or rescission of rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
June 8, 2022
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 9 - 134th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

In the adoption, amendment, or rescission of any rule, an agency shall comply with the following procedure:

(A) Reasonable public notice shall be given in the register of Ohio at least thirty days prior to the date set for a hearing, in the form the agency determines. The agency shall file copies of the public notice under division (B) of this section. (The agency gives public notice in the register of Ohio when the public notice is published in the register under that division.)

The public notice shall include:

(1) A statement of the agency's intention to consider adopting, amending, or rescinding a rule;

(2) A synopsis of the proposed rule, amendment, or rule to be rescinded or a general statement of the subject matter to which the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission relates;

(3) A statement of the reason or purpose for adopting, amending, or rescinding the rule;

(4) The date, time, and place of a hearing on the proposed action, which shall be not earlier than the thirty-first nor later than the fortieth day after the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission is filed under division (B) of this section.

In addition to public notice given in the register of Ohio, the agency may give whatever other notice it reasonably considers necessary to ensure notice constructively is given to all persons who are subject to or affected by the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission.

The agency shall provide a copy of the public notice required under division (A) of this section to any person who requests it and pays a reasonable fee, not to exceed the cost of copying and mailing.

(B) The full text of the proposed rule, amendment, or rule to be rescinded, accompanied by the public notice required under division (A) of this section, shall be filed in electronic form with the secretary of state and with the director of the legislative service commission. (If in compliance with this division an agency files more than one proposed rule, amendment, or rescission at the same time, and has prepared a public notice under division (A) of this section that applies to more than one of the proposed rules, amendments, or rescissions, the agency shall file only one notice with the secretary of state and with the director for all of the proposed rules, amendments, or rescissions to which the notice applies.) The proposed rule, amendment, or rescission and public notice shall be filed as required by this division at least sixty-five days prior to the date on which the agency, in accordance with division (E) of this section, issues an order adopting the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission.

If the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission incorporates a text or other material by reference, the agency shall comply with sections 121.71 to 121.75 of the Revised Code.

The proposed rule, amendment, or rescission shall be available for at least thirty days prior to the date of the hearing at the office of the agency in printed or other legible form without charge to any person affected by the proposal. Failure to furnish such text to any person requesting it shall not invalidate any action of the agency in connection therewith.

If the agency files a revision in the text of the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission, it shall also promptly file the full text of the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission in its revised form in electronic form with the secretary of state and with the director of the legislative service commission.

The agency shall file the rule summary and fiscal analysis prepared under section 106.024 of the Revised Code in electronic form along with a proposed rule, amendment, or rescission or proposed rule, amendment, or rescission in revised form that is filed with the secretary of state or the director of the legislative service commission.

The agency shall file the hearing report relating to a proposed rule, amendment, or rescission in electronic form with the secretary of state and the director of the legislative service commission at the same time the agency files the hearing report with the joint committee on agency rule review.

The director of the legislative service commission shall publish in the register of Ohio the full text of the original and each revised version of a proposed rule, amendment, or rescission; the full text of a public notice; the full text of a rule summary and fiscal analysis; and the full text of a hearing report that is filed with the director under this division.

(C) When an agency files a proposed rule, amendment, or rescission under division (B) of this section, it also shall file in electronic form with the joint committee on agency rule review the full text of the proposed rule, amendment, or rule to be rescinded in the same form and the public notice required under division (A) of this section. (If in compliance with this division an agency files more than one proposed rule, amendment, or rescission at the same time, and has given a public notice under division (A) of this section that applies to more than one of the proposed rules, amendments, or rescissions, the agency shall file only one notice with the joint committee for all of the proposed rules, amendments, or rescissions to which the notice applies.) The proposed rule, amendment, or rescission is subject to legislative review and invalidation under sections 106.02, 106.021, and 106.022 of the Revised Code. If the agency makes a revision in a proposed rule, amendment, or rescission after it is filed with the joint committee, the agency promptly shall file the full text of the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission in its revised form in electronic form with the joint committee.

An agency shall file the rule summary and fiscal analysis prepared under section 106.024 of the Revised Code in electronic form along with a proposed rule, amendment, or rescission, and along with a proposed rule, amendment, or rescission in revised form, that is filed under this division.

If a proposed rule, amendment, or rescission has an adverse impact on businesses, the agency also shall file the business impact analysis, any recommendations received from the common sense initiative office, and the agency's memorandum of response, if any, in electronic form along with the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission, or along with the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission in revised form, that is filed under this division.

The agency shall file the hearing report in electronic form with the joint committee before the joint committee holds its public hearing on the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission. The filing of a hearing report does not constitute a revision of the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission to which the hearing report relates.

If the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission requires liability insurance, a bond, or any other financial responsibility instrument as a condition of licensure, the agency shall conduct a diligent search to determine if the liability insurance, bond, or other financial responsibility instrument is readily available in the amounts required as a condition of licensure, and shall certify to the joint committee that the search was conducted.

If the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission implements a federal law or rule, the agency shall provide to the joint committee a citation to the federal law or rule the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission implements and a statement as to whether the proposed rule implements the federal law or rule in a manner that is more or less stringent or burdensome than the federal law or rule requires.

A proposed rule, amendment, or rescission that is subject to legislative review under this division may not be adopted under division (E) of this section or filed in final form under section 119.04 of the Revised Code unless the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission has been filed with the joint committee on agency rule review under this division and the time for legislative review of the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission has expired without adoption of a concurrent resolution to invalidate the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission.

This division does not apply to:

(1) An emergency rule, amendment, or rescission;

(2) A proposed rule, amendment, or rescission that must be adopted verbatim by an agency pursuant to federal law or rule, to become effective within sixty days of adoption, in order to continue the operation of a federally reimbursed program in this state, so long as the proposed rule contains both of the following:

(a) A statement that it is proposed for the purpose of complying with a federal law or rule;

(b) A citation to the federal law or rule that requires verbatim compliance.

(3) A proposed rule, amendment, or rescission that, as set forth in section 3719.41 of the Revised Code, must be adopted by the state board of pharmacy pursuant to federal law or rule, to become effective within sixty days of adoption, so long as the proposed rule contains a statement that it is proposed for the purpose of complying with federal law or rule.

If a rule or amendment is exempt from legislative review under division (C)(2) of this section, and if the federal law or rule pursuant to which the rule or amendment was adopted expires, is repealed or rescinded, or otherwise terminates, the rule or amendment, or its rescission, is thereafter subject to legislative review under division (C) of this section.

(D) On the date and at the time and place designated in the notice, the agency shall conduct a public hearing at which any person affected by the proposed action of the agency may appear and be heard in person, by the person's attorney, or both, may present the person's position, arguments, or contentions, orally or in writing, offer and examine witnesses, and present evidence tending to show that the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission, if adopted or effectuated, will be unreasonable or unlawful. An agency may permit persons affected by the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission to present their positions, arguments, or contentions in writing, not only at the hearing, but also for a reasonable period before, after, or both before and after the hearing. A person who presents a position or arguments or contentions in writing before or after the hearing is not required to appear at the hearing.

At the hearing, the testimony shall be recorded. Such record shall be made at the expense of the agency. The agency is required to transcribe a record that is not sight readable only if a person requests transcription of all or part of the record and agrees to reimburse the agency for the costs of the transcription. An agency may require the person to pay in advance all or part of the cost of the transcription.

In any hearing under this section the agency may administer oaths or affirmations.

The agency shall consider the positions, arguments, or contentions presented at, or before or after, the hearing. The agency shall prepare a hearing summary of the positions, arguments, or contentions, and of the issues raised by the positions, arguments, or contentions. The agency then shall prepare a hearing report explaining, with regard to each issue, how it is reflected in the rule, amendment, or rescission. If an issue is not reflected in the rule, amendment, or rescission, the hearing report shall explain why the issue is not reflected. The agency shall include the hearing summary in the hearing report as an appendix thereto. And, in the hearing report, the agency shall identify the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission to which the hearing report relates.

(E) After divisions (A), (B), (C), and (D) of this section have been complied with, and when the time for legislative review under sections 106.02, 106.022, and 106.023 of the Revised Code has expired without adoption of a concurrent resolution to invalidate the proposed rule, amendment, or rescission, the agency may issue an order adopting the proposed rule or the proposed amendment or rescission of the rule, consistent with the synopsis or general statement included in the public notice. At that time the agency shall designate the effective date of the rule, amendment, or rescission, which shall not be earlier than the tenth day after the rule, amendment, or rescission has been filed in its final form as provided in section 119.04 of the Revised Code.

(F) Prior to the effective date of a rule, amendment, or rescission, the agency shall make a reasonable effort to inform those affected by the rule, amendment, or rescission and to have available for distribution to those requesting it the full text of the rule as adopted or as amended.

(G)(1) If the governor, upon the request of an agency, determines that an emergency requires the immediate adoption, amendment, or rescission of a rule, the governor shall issue an order, the text of which shall be filed in electronic form with the agency, the secretary of state, the director of the legislative service commission, and the joint committee on agency rule review, that the procedure prescribed by this section with respect to the adoption, amendment, or rescission of a specified rule is suspended. The agency may then adopt immediately the emergency rule, amendment, or rescission and it becomes effective on the date the rule, amendment, or rescission, in final form and in compliance with division (A)(2) of section 119.04 of the Revised Code, is filed in electronic form with the secretary of state, the director of the legislative service commission, and the joint committee on agency rule review. The director shall publish the full text of the emergency rule, amendment, or rescission in the register of Ohio.

Except as provided in division (G)(2) of this section, or section 107.43 of the Revised Code, the emergency rule, amendment, or rescission shall become invalid at the end of the one hundred twentieth day it is in effect. Prior to that date the agency may adopt the emergency rule, amendment, or rescission as a nonemergency rule, amendment, or rescission by complying with the procedure prescribed by this section for the adoption, amendment, and rescission of nonemergency rules. The agency shall not use the procedure of division (G)(1) of this section to readopt the emergency rule, amendment, or rescission so that, upon the emergency rule, amendment, or rescission becoming invalid under division (G)(1) of this section, the emergency rule, amendment, or rescission will continue in effect without interruption for another one-hundred-twenty-day period, except when section 106.02 of the Revised Code prevents the agency from adopting the emergency rule, amendment, or rescission as a nonemergency rule, amendment, or rescission within the one-hundred-twenty-day period.

Division (G)(1) of this section does not apply to the adoption of any emergency rule, amendment, or rescission by the tax commissioner under division (C)(2) of section 5117.02 of the Revised Code.

(2) An emergency rule or amendment adding a substance to a controlled substance schedule shall become invalid at the end of the one hundred eightieth day it is in effect. Prior to that date, the state board of pharmacy may adopt the emergency rule or amendment as a nonemergency rule or amendment by complying with the procedure prescribed by this section for adoption and amendment of nonemergency rules. The board shall not use the procedure of division (G)(1) of this section to readopt the emergency rule or amendment so that, upon the emergency rule or amendment becoming invalid under division (G)(2) of this section, the emergency rule or amendment will continue in effect beyond the one-hundred-eighty-day period.

(3) The general assembly, by adopting a concurrent resolution, and in accordance with section 107.43 of the Revised Code, may do either of the following:

(a) Invalidate, in whole or in part, an emergency rule adopted or amended by an agency in response to a state of emergency, as defined under section 107.42 of the Revised Code, under division (G)(1) of this section;

(b) Authorize an agency to readopt, in whole or in part, a rule that was rescinded in response to a state of emergency under division (G)(1) of this section.

(H) Rules adopted by an authority within the department of job and family services for the administration or enforcement of Chapter 4141. of the Revised Code or of the department of taxation shall be effective without a hearing as provided by this section if the statutes pertaining to such agency specifically give a right of appeal to the board of tax appeals or to a higher authority within the agency or to a court, and also give the appellant a right to a hearing on such appeal. This division does not apply to the adoption of any rule, amendment, or rescission by the tax commissioner under division (C)(1) or (2) of section 5117.02 of the Revised Code, or deny the right to file an action for declaratory judgment as provided in Chapter 2721. of the Revised Code from the decision of the board of tax appeals or of the higher authority within such agency.

Last updated March 11, 2022 at 3:52 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 75 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1961–2024 · leading case: State Med. Bd. v. Murray, 613 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Med. Bd. v. Murray, 613 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio 1993). · cites it 20× “3 Procedures for the adoption, amendment, or rescission of agency rules are set forth in R.C. 119.03. Of particular importance in this case are R.”
Ne. Ohio Reg'l Sewer Dist. v. Shank, 567 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 1991). · cites it 14× “These requirements, enumerated in R.C. 119.03, include public notice, filing with the executive and legislative branches of government, public hearing, and notification of persons especially affected by the rule.”
State v. Delvallie, 2022 Ohio 470 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “R.C. 119.03(I)(2)(b). If the rule is not invalidated at that session, then the agency may issue an order adopting the rule.”
Fairfield Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Nally, 34 N.E.3d 873 (Ohio 2015). · cites it 7× “EPA’s approval of the TMDL for Big Walnut Creek watershed was not a “promulgation” of the TMDL as that process is described in R.C. 119.03. The only review of the TMDL was the review by U.”
Univ. Hosp. v. State Emp. Relations Bd., 587 N.E.2d 835 (Ohio 1992). · cites it 2× “) This standard would obviously apply to appeals of final orders of adjudication rendered by SERB inasmuch as R.”
In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C., 2023 Ohio 3778 (Ohio 2023). · cites it 3× “42 of the Revised Code, under division (G)(1) of [R.C. 119.03]; (b) Authorize an agency to readopt, in whole or in part, a rule that was rescinded in response to a state of emergency under division (G)(1) of [R.”
City of Middletown v. Nichols, 458 N.E.2d 886 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 15× “In his first three assigned errors, appellant contends that the board erred in requiring rulemaking procedures by the OEPA beyond those required by R.C. 119.03. The purpose of the Environmental Board of Review is to hear appeals from any party to a proceeding before the director…”
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Maynard, 488 N.E.2d 220 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 5× “R.C. 119.03. R.C. Chapter 3734 was enacted in 1980 in response to the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, Sections 6901-6987, Title 42, U.”
Crawford-Cole v. Lucas Cnty. Dep't of Job & Fam. Servs., 2009 Ohio 1355 (Ohio 2009). · cites it 3× “04, deals with rulemaking and requires agencies to give public notice of proposed rules, R.C. 119.03(A), to submit proposed rules to the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, R.”
Fortner v. Thomas, 257 N.E.2d 371 (Ohio 1970). · cites it 2× “11 provides, in part: “Any person adversely affected by an order of an agency in adopting, amending, or rescinding a rule or in adopting, readopting, or continuing a rule, amendment, or rescission previously adopted as an emergency rule as provided in Section 119.03 of the…”
Chambers v. St. Mary's Sch., 697 N.E.2d 198 (Ohio 1998). “R.C. 119.03(I)(2)(b). If the rule is not invalidated at that session, then the agency may issue an order adopting the rule.”
Michael v. Ghee, 498 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. 2007). “Code 5120 :1-1-07, and claim that “[r]endering decisions without fully disclosing eligibility criteria is akin to deviating from fixed rules and rendering decisions predicated upon unknown rules.”
Show all 75 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(1) — 3 cases
State Ex Rel. Meadows v. Hechler, 462 S.E.2d 586 (W. Va. 1995).
Princeton City Sch. Dist. v. Ohio State Bd. of Educ., 645 N.E.2d 773 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
Celebrezze v. Fred Godard Ford, Inc., 500 N.E.2d 881 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(A) — 5 cases
State Med. Bd. v. Murray, 613 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio 1993). “3 Procedures for the adoption, amendment, or rescission of agency rules are set forth in R.C. 119.03. Of particular importance in this case are R.”
Crawford-Cole v. Lucas Cnty. Dep't of Job & Fam. Servs., 2009 Ohio 1355 (Ohio 2009). “04, deals with rulemaking and requires agencies to give public notice of proposed rules, R.C. 119.03(A), to submit proposed rules to the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, R.”
Fairfield Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Nally, 34 N.E.3d 873 (Ohio 2015). “EPA’s approval of the TMDL for Big Walnut Creek watershed was not a “promulgation” of the TMDL as that process is described in R.C. 119.03. The only review of the TMDL was the review by U.”
State Med. Bd. of Ohio v. Murray, 1993 Ohio 14 (Ohio 1993).
W6 Restaurant Grp., Ltd. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 2022 Ohio 3511 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(A)(1) — 2 cases
State Med. Bd. v. Murray, 613 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio 1993). “3 Procedures for the adoption, amendment, or rescission of agency rules are set forth in R.C. 119.03. Of particular importance in this case are R.”
State Med. Bd. of Ohio v. Murray, 1993 Ohio 14 (Ohio 1993).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(A)(2) — 1 case
City of Middletown v. Nichols, 458 N.E.2d 886 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983). “In his first three assigned errors, appellant contends that the board erred in requiring rulemaking procedures by the OEPA beyond those required by R.C. 119.03. The purpose of the Environmental Board of Review is to hear appeals from any party to a proceeding before the director…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(A)(4) — 3 cases
State Med. Bd. v. Murray, 613 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio 1993). “3 Procedures for the adoption, amendment, or rescission of agency rules are set forth in R.C. 119.03. Of particular importance in this case are R.”
State Med. Bd. of Ohio v. Murray, 1993 Ohio 14 (Ohio 1993).
Fayette Fire & Saf. Equip. Co. v. Hennosy, 582 N.E.2d 1006 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(B) — 4 cases
Ne. Ohio Reg'l Sewer Dist. v. Shank, 567 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 1991). “These requirements, enumerated in R.C. 119.03, include public notice, filing with the executive and legislative branches of government, public hearing, and notification of persons especially affected by the rule.”
Crawford-Cole v. Lucas Cnty. Dep't of Job & Fam. Servs., 2009 Ohio 1355 (Ohio 2009). “04, deals with rulemaking and requires agencies to give public notice of proposed rules, R.C. 119.03(A), to submit proposed rules to the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, R.”
Fairfield Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Nally, 34 N.E.3d 873 (Ohio 2015). “EPA’s approval of the TMDL for Big Walnut Creek watershed was not a “promulgation” of the TMDL as that process is described in R.C. 119.03. The only review of the TMDL was the review by U.”
Celebrezze v. Fred Godard Ford, Inc., 500 N.E.2d 881 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(C) — 6 cases
State Med. Bd. v. Murray, 613 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio 1993). “3 Procedures for the adoption, amendment, or rescission of agency rules are set forth in R.C. 119.03. Of particular importance in this case are R.”
Biglin v. S (In re Black Fork Wind Energy, L. L.C.), 124 N.E.3d 787 (Ohio 2018).
In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 5206 (Ohio 2018).
Fairfield Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Nally, 34 N.E.3d 873 (Ohio 2015). “EPA’s approval of the TMDL for Big Walnut Creek watershed was not a “promulgation” of the TMDL as that process is described in R.C. 119.03. The only review of the TMDL was the review by U.”
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Maynard, 488 N.E.2d 220 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984). “R.C. 119.03. R.C. Chapter 3734 was enacted in 1980 in response to the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, Sections 6901-6987, Title 42, U.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(D) — 5 cases
City of Middletown v. Nichols, 458 N.E.2d 886 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983). “In his first three assigned errors, appellant contends that the board erred in requiring rulemaking procedures by the OEPA beyond those required by R.C. 119.03. The purpose of the Environmental Board of Review is to hear appeals from any party to a proceeding before the director…”
Ohio Democratic Party v. LaRose, 2020 Ohio 4778 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State Med. Bd. v. Murray, 613 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio 1993). “3 Procedures for the adoption, amendment, or rescission of agency rules are set forth in R.C. 119.03. Of particular importance in this case are R.”
Fairfield Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Nally, 34 N.E.3d 873 (Ohio 2015). “EPA’s approval of the TMDL for Big Walnut Creek watershed was not a “promulgation” of the TMDL as that process is described in R.C. 119.03. The only review of the TMDL was the review by U.”
State Med. Bd. of Ohio v. Murray, 1993 Ohio 14 (Ohio 1993).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(E) — 3 cases
State Med. Bd. v. Murray, 613 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio 1993). “3 Procedures for the adoption, amendment, or rescission of agency rules are set forth in R.C. 119.03. Of particular importance in this case are R.”
State Med. Bd. of Ohio v. Murray, 1993 Ohio 14 (Ohio 1993).
Celebrezze v. Fred Godard Ford, Inc., 500 N.E.2d 881 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(G) — 3 cases
W6 Restaurant Grp., Ltd. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 2022 Ohio 3511 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Miller v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n (S.D. Ohio 2022).
Miller v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n (S.D. Ohio 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(G)(1) — 1 case
W6 Restaurant Grp., Ltd. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 2022 Ohio 3511 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(G)(3) — 1 case
In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C., 2023 Ohio 3778 (Ohio 2023). “42 of the Revised Code, under division (G)(1) of [R.C. 119.03]; (b) Authorize an agency to readopt, in whole or in part, a rule that was rescinded in response to a state of emergency under division (G)(1) of [R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(H) — 2 cases
Crawford-Cole v. Lucas Cnty. Dep't of Job & Fam. Servs., 2009 Ohio 1355 (Ohio 2009). “04, deals with rulemaking and requires agencies to give public notice of proposed rules, R.C. 119.03(A), to submit proposed rules to the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, R.”
Ne. Ohio Reg'l Sewer Dist. v. Shank, 567 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 1991). “These requirements, enumerated in R.C. 119.03, include public notice, filing with the executive and legislative branches of government, public hearing, and notification of persons especially affected by the rule.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(H)(2) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Meadows v. Hechler, 462 S.E.2d 586 (W. Va. 1995).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(I)(1) — 1 case
B&T Express, Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 763 N.E.2d 1241 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(I)(2)(b) — 3 cases
State v. Delvallie, 2022 Ohio 470 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “R.C. 119.03(I)(2)(b). If the rule is not invalidated at that session, then the agency may issue an order adopting the rule.”
Chambers v. St. Mary's Sch., 697 N.E.2d 198 (Ohio 1998). “R.C. 119.03(I)(2)(b). If the rule is not invalidated at that session, then the agency may issue an order adopting the rule.”
Chambers v. St. Mary's Sch., 1998 Ohio 184 (Ohio 1998).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(I)(3) — 1 case
Ne. Ohio Reg'l Sewer Dist. v. Shank, 567 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 1991). “These requirements, enumerated in R.C. 119.03, include public notice, filing with the executive and legislative branches of government, public hearing, and notification of persons especially affected by the rule.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(I)(l)(d) — 1 case
Ne. Ohio Reg'l Sewer Dist. v. Shank, 567 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 1991). “These requirements, enumerated in R.C. 119.03, include public notice, filing with the executive and legislative branches of government, public hearing, and notification of persons especially affected by the rule.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 119.03(f)(1) — 1 case
B&T Express, Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 763 N.E.2d 1241 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.