Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 124.07 (2026)

Director of administrative services employees, services and facilities

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) The director of administrative services shall appoint examiners, inspectors, clerks, and other assistants as necessary to carry out sections 124.01 to 124.64 of the Revised Code.

(B) Each state agency shall pay the cost of the services and facilities furnished to it by the department of administrative services that are necessary to provide and maintain payroll services as prescribed in section 125.21 of the Revised Code and state merit standards as prescribed in sections 124.01 to 124.64 of the Revised Code for the agency. The charges against a state agency shall be computed on a reasonable cost basis in accordance with procedures prescribed by the director of budget and management. Any moneys the department receives from a state agency under this division that are in excess of the amount necessary to pay the cost of furnishing the department's services and facilities during any fiscal year shall be either refunded to or credited for the ensuing fiscal year to the state agency.

(C) All moneys received by the department as reimbursement for a merit program or other human resources services performed and facilities furnished under this section, such as competitive examinations administered, shall be paid into the state treasury to the credit of the human resources services fund, which is hereby created.

Last updated July 29, 2025 at 4:27 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2000 · leading case: Ohio Ass'n of Pub. Sch. Employees v. City of Twinsburg, 522 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ohio Ass'n of Pub. Sch. Employees v. City of Twinsburg, 522 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio 1988). ““The authority of the General Assembly, to enact laws applicable to cities pursuant to Section 10 of Article XV of the Constitution, is an authority to enact such laws to be applicable in cities only where and to the extent that such laws will not restrict the exercise by such…”
Gonzalez v. Moffitt (In Re Moffitt), 254 B.R. 389 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2000). “MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 124.07[6][b] (3rd ed.1997). Notwithstanding, this Court need not decide this issue as the only significant difference between Ohio rules on collateral estoppel versus the federal rules on collateral estoppel is Ohio’s requirement of mutuality between…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.