In an action under sections 1333.61 to 1333.69 of the Revised Code, a court shall preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret by reasonable means that may include granting protective orders in connection with discovery proceedings, holding in-camera hearings, sealing the records of the action, and ordering any person involved in the litigation not to disclose an alleged trade secret without prior court approval.
Precision Strip, Inc. v. Dircksen, 2020-Ohio-6668. · cites it 13דPrecision Strip requested the trial court issue an order placing the confidential documents and information under seal, closing the courtroom, and sealing the transcripts from the proceedings under R.C. 1333.65, which provides for the protection of alleged trade secrets.”
Glasstech, Inc. v. TGL Tempering Sys., Inc., 50 F. Supp. 2d 722 (N.D. Ohio 1999). · cites it 2דGlasstech filed a complaint on April 13, 1998 alleging that Defendants violated the Ohio Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Ohio Rev.Code §§ 1333.65 et seq. and the Ohio common law by misappropriating its trade secrets.”
State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State Univ., 721 N.E.2d 1044 (Ohio 2000). “64, and court preservation of trade secrets in a civil action under the Act, R.C. 1333.65. The Act also retained criminal remedies, whether or not based on the misappropriation of a trade secret.”
Ne. Prof'l Home Care, Inc. v. Advantage Home Health Servs., Inc., 936 N.E.2d 964 (Ohio Ct. App. 5th Dist. 2010). “” {¶ 51} While we note that the case at bar does not involve “trade secrets,” per se, we note by way of analogy that R.C. 1333.65 provides that a court may preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret by reasonable means, including holding in camera hearings, sealing the…”
Alpha Benefits Agency, Inc. v. King Ins. Agency, Inc., 731 N.E.2d 1209 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1999). “R.C. 1333.65 provides that a court may preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret by reasonable means, including holding in-camera hearings, sealing the records of the action and ordering any person involved in the litigation not to disclose an alleged trade secret.”
Montrose Ford, Inc. v. Starn, 770 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2002). “Specifically, Clarke has maintained that because one of the attorneys who will see the information Clarke has been ordered to disclose serves as general counsel to Montrose, the disclosure ordered by the trial court is tantamount to turning over Clarke’s trade secrets to…”
Setters v. Durrani, 2022-Ohio-1022. “65 provides that a court may preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret by reasonable means, including holding in-camera hearings, sealing the records of the action and ordering any person involved in the litigation not to disclose an alleged trade secret.”). {¶33}…”
Speece v. Speece, 2017-Ohio-7950. “Pursuant to R.C. 1333.65, “a court shall preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret by reasonable means that may include granting protective orders in connection with discovery proceedings, holding in-camera hearings, sealing the records of the action, 7 and ordering any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.