Notes of Decisions
Cited in
17
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case:
In Re Taubman, 160 B.R. 964 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1993).
In Re Taubman, 160 B.R. 964 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1993).
· cites it 7× “§ 548 (a)(2)(B)(ii); O.R.C. § 1336.06 with § 548(a)(2)(B)(iii)), contain a separate basis for liability, to wit: constructive fraud, predicated on insolvency at the time of a transfer, coupled with lack of adequate consideration or good faith transfer.”
Belfance v. Bushey (In Re Bushey), 210 B.R. 95 (6th Cir. BAP 1997).
· cites it 9× “1986) (repealed), 1 notwithstanding that the account balance passed through zero between the challenged transfer and the bankruptcy filing; (3) whether a creditor with a continuously open credit card account is a “future” creditor under Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 1336.06 and § 1336.07…”
Comer v. Calim, 716 N.E.2d 245 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 5× “The statutory basis of Calim’s argument is R.C. 1336.06, which determines when a transfer is made or an obligation incurred.”
Allan v. Allan, 2022 Ohio 1488 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 4× “3d 599, 604 , 716 N.E.2d 245 (1st Dist.1998). In determining whether a transfer is made under the Fraudulent Transfer Act, R.”
Ransier v. McFarland (In Re McFarland), 170 B.R. 613 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1994).
· cites it 2× “See Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.06(A)(1)(a). At that time valid liens against the property consisted of a first mortgage in the amount of $658,858 and a second mortgage in the amount of $100,000.”
Stein v. Brown, 480 N.E.2d 1121 (Ohio 1985).
“” R.C. 1336.06 also states: “Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred without fair consideration, when the person making the conveyance or entering into the obligation intends or believes that he will incur debts beyond his ability to pay as they mature, is fraudulent…”
Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery of Canton, Inc. v. DiMazzio, 524 N.E.2d 915 (Ohio Ct. App. 1987).
“” R.C. 1336.06, debts incurred beyond ability to pay, recites: “Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred without fair consideration, when the person making the conveyance or entering into the obligation intends or believes that he will incur debts beyond his ability…”
Guernsey Cty. Cmty. Dev. Corp. v. Speedy, 2023 Ohio 1796 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
“R.C. 1336.06(A)(1) states that a transfer of real property is made for purposes of Chapter 1336 “when the transfer is so far perfected that a good faith purchaser of the asset from the debtor against whom applicable law permits the transfer to be perfected cannot acquire an…”
Frayer Seed, Inc. v. Century 21 Fertilizer & Farm Chemicals, Inc., 555 N.E.2d 654 (Ohio Ct. App. 1988).
“* * *” R.C. 1336.06 provides: “Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred without fair consideration, when the person making the conveyance or entering into the obligation intends or believes that he will incur debts beyond his ability to pay as they mature, is…”
Crocker v. Hood, 681 N.E.2d 460 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
“R.C. 1336.06 deals with consideration and provided: “Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred without fair consideration, when the person making the conveyance or entering into the obligation intends or believes that he will incur debts beyond his ability to pay as…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.06(A)(1) — 1 case
Guernsey Cty. Cmty. Dev. Corp. v. Speedy, 2023 Ohio 1796 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
“R.C. 1336.06(A)(1) states that a transfer of real property is made for purposes of Chapter 1336 “when the transfer is so far perfected that a good faith purchaser of the asset from the debtor against whom applicable law permits the transfer to be perfected cannot acquire an…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.06(A)(1)(a) — 1 case
Ransier v. McFarland (In Re McFarland), 170 B.R. 613 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1994).
“See Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.06(A)(1)(a). At that time valid liens against the property consisted of a first mortgage in the amount of $658,858 and a second mortgage in the amount of $100,000.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.06(A)(1)(b) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.06(A)(2)(a) — 3 cases
Allan v. Allan, 2022 Ohio 1488 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
“3d 599, 604 , 716 N.E.2d 245 (1st Dist.1998). In determining whether a transfer is made under the Fraudulent Transfer Act, R.”
Comer v. Calim, 716 N.E.2d 245 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).
“The statutory basis of Calim’s argument is R.C. 1336.06, which determines when a transfer is made or an obligation incurred.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 1336.06(A)(2)(b) — 1 case
Comer v. Calim, 716 N.E.2d 245 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).
“The statutory basis of Calim’s argument is R.C. 1336.06, which determines when a transfer is made or an obligation incurred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.