Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1345.48 (2026)

Deceptive acts or practices - damages

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effective:

September 22, 1976

Latest Legislation:

Senate Bill 157 - 111th General Assembly

PDF:

Download Authenticated PDF

(A) Failure to comply with sections 1345.41 to 1345.50 of the Revised Code constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction in violation of section 1345.02 of the Revised Code.

(B) If the seller of a prepaid entertainment contract fails to comply with division (D) (4) (a) of section 1345.44 of the Revised Code, the buyer may recover the amount of money due to him under that section and, in addition, may recover damages in an amount equal to the amount of money due to him and reasonable attorney's fees.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1989–2012 · leading case: Mid-Am. Acceptance Co. v. Lightle, 579 N.E.2d 721 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mid-Am. Acceptance Co. v. Lightle, 579 N.E.2d 721 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 6× “42(B)(3) and, pursuant to R.C. 1345.48, “ * * * constitutes a deceptive act * * * in violation of section 1345.”

Robins v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, 838 F. Supp. 2d 631 (N.D. Ohio 2012). · cites it 2× “41 constitutes a deceptive sales practice under Ohio Rev.Code § 1345.”

Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, 863 F. Supp. 2d 677 (S.D. Ohio 2012). · cites it 2× “Code § 1345.41(A)(4). Failure to comply with the PECA constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction, in violation of the CSPA.”

Vincent v. Neyer, 745 N.E.2d 1127 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “R.C. 1345.48(A) states that failure to comply with R.”

— Ohio Rev. Code § 1345.48(A) — 3 cases

Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, 863 F. Supp. 2d 677 (S.D. Ohio 2012). “Code § 1345.41(A)(4). Failure to comply with the PECA constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction, in violation of the CSPA.”

Mid-Am. Acceptance Co. v. Lightle, 579 N.E.2d 721 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989). “42(B)(3) and, pursuant to R.C. 1345.48, “ * * * constitutes a deceptive act * * * in violation of section 1345.”

Vincent v. Neyer, 745 N.E.2d 1127 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “R.C. 1345.48(A) states that failure to comply with R.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.