Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 1345
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1345.48 (2026)

Deceptive acts or practices - damages

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
September 22, 1976
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 157 - 111th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) Failure to comply with sections 1345.41 to 1345.50 of the Revised Code constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction in violation of section 1345.02 of the Revised Code.

(B) If the seller of a prepaid entertainment contract fails to comply with division (D) (4) (a) of section 1345.44 of the Revised Code, the buyer may recover the amount of money due to him under that section and, in addition, may recover damages in an amount equal to the amount of money due to him and reasonable attorney's fees.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1989–2012 · leading case: Mid-Am. Acceptance Co. v. Lightle, 579 N.E.2d 721 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mid-Am. Acceptance Co. v. Lightle, 579 N.E.2d 721 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1989). · cites it 6× “42(B)(3) and, pursuant to R.C. 1345.48, “ * * * constitutes a deceptive act * * * in violation of section 1345.”
Robins v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, 838 F. Supp. 2d 631 (N.D. Ohio 2012). · cites it 2× “41 constitutes a deceptive sales practice under Ohio Rev.Code § 1345.”
Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, 863 F. Supp. 2d 677 (S.D. Ohio 2012). · cites it 2× “Code § 1345.41(A)(4). Failure to comply with the PECA constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction, in violation of the CSPA.”
Vincent v. Neyer, 745 N.E.2d 1127 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 2000). “R.C. 1345.48(A) states that failure to comply with R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 1345.48(A): 3 cases
Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, 863 F. Supp. 2d 677 (S.D. Ohio 2012). “Code § 1345.41(A)(4). Failure to comply with the PECA constitutes a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction, in violation of the CSPA.”
Mid-Am. Acceptance Co. v. Lightle, 579 N.E.2d 721 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1989). “42(B)(3) and, pursuant to R.C. 1345.48, “ * * * constitutes a deceptive act * * * in violation of section 1345.”
Vincent v. Neyer, 745 N.E.2d 1127 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 2000). “R.C. 1345.48(A) states that failure to comply with R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.