(A) The person executing a jurat shall certify all of the following:
(1) The signer appeared before the notary public;
(2) The notary public administered an oath or affirmation to the signer that the statement in the jurat is true and correct;
(3) The signer signed the document in the presence of the notary public.
(B) The oath or affirmation administered by the notary public to the signer of a jurat shall include one of the following questions, or substantially similar questions:
(1) "Do you solemnly swear that the statements in this document are true, so help you God?"
(2) "Do you affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the statements in this document are true?"
Rhiel v. Huntington Nat'l Bank (In Re Phalen), 445 B.R. 830 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2011). · cites it 8ד’ R.C. § 147.54.” ... [S]ince Ohio defines “acknowledged before me” to mean “[t]he person acknowledging appeared before the [notary]” [R.”
Noland v. Burns (In Re Burns), 435 B.R. 503 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2010). · cites it 4דORC § 147.54 provides that the acknowl-edgement certification may either be “in a form prescribed by Ohio law” or contain the words “ ‘acknowledged before me’ or their substantial equivalent.”
Regions Bank v. Seimer, 2014 Ohio 95 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “{¶ 25} Pursuant to R.C. 147.54, "[t]he form of a certificate of acknowledgment used by a person whose authority is recognized under section 147.”
Rieser v. Fifth Third Mortg. Co. (In Re Wahl), 407 B.R. 883 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2009). · cites it 2ד53 requires the notary public to certify that: (A) The person acknowledging appeared before him and acknowledged he executed the instrument; (B) The person acknowledging was known to the person taking the acknowledgment, or that the person taking the acknowledgment had…”
Simon v. Citimortgage, Inc. (In Re Doubov), 423 B.R. 505 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2010). · cites it 2ד” Ohio Rev.Code § 147.54. In the case of a natural person, the phrase “acknowledged before me” means that the person signing her name appeared before the person taking the acknowledgment, acknowledged that she signed the instrument for the purpose stated in it, and that the…”
Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In Re Roberts), 402 B.R. 808 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2009). “§ 147.54. This is because Ohio law defines the words “acknowledged before me ” such that they incorporate the certification requirements of § 147.”
Mid-Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Gymnastics Internat'l, Inc., 451 N.E.2d 1243 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982). “53, § 147.54, § 147.55 and § 5301.01. “3. The judgment of the trial court is contrary to law for the reason that the appellee’s mortgage was defectively-acknowledged at the time appellant recorded its mortgage on the same real estate and therefore was without any effect at law…”
McClatchey v. GMAC Mortg., LLC (In re Lacy), 483 B.R. 126 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2012). · cites it 3ד54(C) or, as authorized in § 147.54(A) of the Ohio Revised Code, by using one of the statutory short forms of acknowledgment, each of which contains the phrase “acknowledged before me.”
State v. Pelfrey, 2022 Ohio 721 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “53 and R.C. 147.54. In this regard, the court stated that: R.”
Geygan v. World Sav. Bank, FSB (In Re Nolan), 365 B.R. 804 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2007). “” Ohio Revised Code § 147.54 states that the form of a certificate of acknowledgment is proper if it either is “in a form prescribed by the laws or regulations of this state” or if it “contains the words ‘acknowledged before me’ or their substantial equivalent.”
Clyde Hardesty v. CitiFinancial, Inc., 414 F. App'x 761 (6th Cir. 2011). “” Thus, under Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 147.54(C), “[t]he form of a certificate of acknowledgment .”
State v. Lucas, 2025 Ohio 4863 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2דIn my view, the execution of the jurat was improper under R.C. 147.54. {¶22} The requirement that the affiant swear under oath is a requirement of both the Federal and Ohio Constitutions.”
Rhiel v. Huntington Nat'l Bank (In Re Phalen), 445 B.R. 830 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2011). “’ R.C. § 147.54.” ... [S]ince Ohio defines “acknowledged before me” to mean “[t]he person acknowledging appeared before the [notary]” [R.”
McClatchey v. GMAC Mortg., LLC (In re Lacy), 483 B.R. 126 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2012). “54(C) or, as authorized in § 147.54(A) of the Ohio Revised Code, by using one of the statutory short forms of acknowledgment, each of which contains the phrase “acknowledged before me.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 147.54(B) — 1 case
Noland v. Burns (In Re Burns), 435 B.R. 503 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2010). “ORC § 147.54 provides that the acknowl-edgement certification may either be “in a form prescribed by Ohio law” or contain the words “ ‘acknowledged before me’ or their substantial equivalent.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 147.54(C) — 3 cases
Rhiel v. Huntington Nat'l Bank (In Re Phalen), 445 B.R. 830 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2011). “’ R.C. § 147.54.” ... [S]ince Ohio defines “acknowledged before me” to mean “[t]he person acknowledging appeared before the [notary]” [R.”
McClatchey v. GMAC Mortg., LLC (In re Lacy), 483 B.R. 126 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2012). “54(C) or, as authorized in § 147.54(A) of the Ohio Revised Code, by using one of the statutory short forms of acknowledgment, each of which contains the phrase “acknowledged before me.”
Clyde Hardesty v. CitiFinancial, Inc., 414 F. App'x 761 (6th Cir. 2011). “” Thus, under Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 147.54(C), “[t]he form of a certificate of acknowledgment .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.