Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1925.03 (2026)

Voluntary conciliation procedures

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effective:

September 9, 1988

Latest Legislation:

House Bill 372 - 117th General Assembly

PDF:

Download Authenticated PDF

The court may establish, by rule, voluntary conciliation procedures for the small claims division, except that it shall establish, by rule, voluntary conciliation procedures for the recovery of taxes in the small claims division.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: N. Star Med. Rsch., L.L.C. v. Kozlovich, 2025 Ohio 5410 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

N. Star Med. Rsch., L.L.C. v. Kozlovich, 2025 Ohio 5410 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “1925, governing small claims divisions, does not actually by statute exclude proceedings from the formal rules of evidence although the Chapter does provide for “conciliation procedures” ( R.C. 1925.03), and on many occasions referees as “a practical matter” ignore rules of…”

Kapper v. Valantine Roofing & Home Remodeling, Inc., 2026 Ohio 103 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026). “1925, governing small claims divisions, does not actually by statute exclude proceedings from the formal rules of evidence although the Chapter does provide for “conciliation procedures” (R.C. 1925.03), and on many occasions referees as “a practical matter” ignore rules of…”

Neeley v. Casey, 624 F. Supp. 906 (S.D. Ohio 1985). · cites it 2× “See O.R.C. § 1925.03(C)(4). Other felonies of the third degree in Ohio include safecraking, O.”

Oakhill Invest., L.L.C. v. Toe, 2025 Ohio 4691 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “Because settlement of small claims matters are encouraged under R.C. 1925.03, negotiations may occur while the parties wait.”

— Ohio Rev. Code § 1925.03(C)(4) — 1 case

Neeley v. Casey, 624 F. Supp. 906 (S.D. Ohio 1985). “See O.R.C. § 1925.03(C)(4). Other felonies of the third degree in Ohio include safecraking, O.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.