Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 1925
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 1925.03 (2026)

Voluntary conciliation procedures

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
September 9, 1988
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 372 - 117th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The court may establish, by rule, voluntary conciliation procedures for the small claims division, except that it shall establish, by rule, voluntary conciliation procedures for the recovery of taxes in the small claims division.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: N. Star Med. Rsch., L.L.C. v. Kozlovich, 2025-Ohio-5410.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
N. Star Med. Rsch., L.L.C. v. Kozlovich, 2025-Ohio-5410. “1925, governing small claims divisions, does not actually by statute exclude proceedings from the formal rules of evidence although the Chapter does provide for “conciliation procedures” ( R.C. 1925.03), and on many occasions referees as “a practical matter” ignore rules of…”
Kapper v. Valantine Roofing & Home Remodeling, Inc., 2026-Ohio-103. “1925, governing small claims divisions, does not actually by statute exclude proceedings from the formal rules of evidence although the Chapter does provide for “conciliation procedures” (R.C. 1925.03), and on many occasions referees as “a practical matter” ignore rules of…”
Neeley v. Casey, 624 F. Supp. 906 (S.D. Ohio 1985). · cites it 2× “See O.R.C. § 1925.03(C)(4). Other felonies of the third degree in Ohio include safecraking, O.”
Oakhill Invest., L.L.C. v. Toe, 2025-Ohio-4691. “Because settlement of small claims matters are encouraged under R.C. 1925.03, negotiations may occur while the parties wait.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 1925.03(C)(4): 1 case
Neeley v. Casey, 624 F. Supp. 906 (S.D. Ohio 1985). “See O.R.C. § 1925.03(C)(4). Other felonies of the third degree in Ohio include safecraking, O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.