Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24 (2026)

Jurisdiction of probate court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A)(1) Except as otherwise provided by law, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction:

(a) To take the proof of wills and to admit to record authenticated copies of wills executed, proved, and allowed in the courts of any other state, territory, or country. If the probate judge is unavoidably absent, any judge of the court of common pleas may take proof of wills and approve bonds to be given, but the record of these acts shall be preserved in the usual records of the probate court.

(b) To grant and revoke letters testamentary and of administration;

(c) To direct and control the conduct and settle the accounts of executors and administrators and order the distribution of estates;

(d) To appoint the attorney general to serve as the administrator of an estate pursuant to section 2113.06 of the Revised Code;

(e) To appoint and remove guardians, conservators, and testamentary trustees, direct and control their conduct, and settle their accounts;

(f) To grant marriage licenses;

(g) To make inquests respecting persons who are so mentally impaired as a result of a mental or physical illness or disability, as a result of intellectual disability, or as a result of chronic substance abuse, that they are unable to manage their property and affairs effectively, subject to guardianship;

(h) To qualify assignees, appoint and qualify trustees and commissioners of insolvents, control their conduct, and settle their accounts;

(i) To authorize the sale of lands, equitable estates, or interests in lands or equitable estates, and the assignments of inchoate dower in such cases of sale, on petition by executors, administrators, and guardians;

(j) To authorize the completion of real property contracts on petition of executors and administrators;

(k) To construe wills;

(l) To render declaratory judgments, including, but not limited to, those rendered pursuant to Chapter 5817. of the Revised Code;

(m) To direct and control the conduct of fiduciaries and settle their accounts;

(n) To authorize the sale or lease of any estate created by will if the estate is held in trust, on petition by the trustee;

(o) To terminate a testamentary trust in any case in which a court of equity may do so;

(p) To hear and determine actions to contest the validity of wills;

(q) To make a determination of the presumption of death of missing persons and to adjudicate the property rights and obligations of all parties affected by the presumption;

(r) To act for and issue orders regarding wards pursuant to section 2111.50 of the Revised Code;

(s) To hear and determine actions against sureties on the bonds of fiduciaries appointed by the probate court;

(t) To hear and determine actions involving informed consent for medication of persons hospitalized pursuant to section 5122.141 or 5122.15 of the Revised Code;

(u) To hear and determine actions relating to durable powers of attorney for health care as described in division (D) of section 1337.16 of the Revised Code;

(v) To hear and determine actions commenced by objecting individuals, in accordance with section 2133.05 of the Revised Code;

(w) To hear and determine complaints that pertain to the use or continuation, or the withholding or withdrawal, of life-sustaining treatment in connection with certain patients allegedly in a terminal condition or in a permanently unconscious state pursuant to division (E) of section 2133.08 of the Revised Code, in accordance with that division;

(x) To hear and determine applications that pertain to the withholding or withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from certain patients allegedly in a permanently unconscious state pursuant to section 2133.09 of the Revised Code, in accordance with that section;

(y) To hear and determine applications of attending physicians in accordance with division (B) of section 2133.15 of the Revised Code;

(z) To hear and determine actions relative to the use or continuation of comfort care in connection with certain principals under durable powers of attorney for health care, declarants under declarations, or patients in accordance with division (E) of either section 1337.16 or 2133.12 of the Revised Code;

(aa) To hear and determine applications for an order relieving an estate from administration under section 2113.03 of the Revised Code;

(bb) To hear and determine applications for an order granting a summary release from administration under section 2113.031 of the Revised Code;

(cc) To hear and determine actions relating to the exercise of the right of disposition, in accordance with section 2108.90 of the Revised Code;

(dd) To hear and determine actions relating to the disinterment and reinterment of human remains under section 517.23 of the Revised Code;

(ee) To hear and determine petitions for an order for treatment of a person experiencing alcohol and other drug abuse filed under section 5119.93 of the Revised Code and to order treatment of that nature in accordance with, and take other actions afforded to the court under, sections 5119.90 to 5119.98 of the Revised Code;

(ff) To hear and determine petitions for adoption.

(2) In addition to the exclusive jurisdiction conferred upon the probate court by division (A)(1) of this section, the probate court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over a particular subject matter if both of the following apply:

(a) Another section of the Revised Code expressly confers jurisdiction over that subject matter upon the probate court.

(b) No section of the Revised Code expressly confers jurisdiction over that subject matter upon any other court or agency.

(B)(1) The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as, the general division of the court of common pleas to issue writs and orders, and to hear and determine actions as follows:

(a) If jurisdiction relative to a particular subject matter is stated to be concurrent in a section of the Revised Code or has been construed by judicial decision to be concurrent, any action that involves that subject matter;

(b) Any action that involves an inter vivos trust; a trust created pursuant to section 5815.28 of the Revised Code; a charitable trust or foundation; subject to divisions (A)(1)(t) and (y) of this section, a power of attorney, including, but not limited to, a durable power of attorney; the medical treatment of a competent adult; or a writ of habeas corpus;

(c) Subject to section 2101.31 of the Revised Code, any action with respect to a probate estate, guardianship, trust, or post-death dispute that involves any of the following:

(i) A designation or removal of a beneficiary of a life insurance policy, annuity contract, retirement plan, brokerage account, security account, bank account, real property, or tangible personal property;

(ii) A designation or removal of a payable-on-death beneficiary or transfer-on-death beneficiary;

(iii) A change in the title to any asset involving a joint and survivorship interest;

(iv) An alleged gift;

(v) The passing of assets upon the death of an individual otherwise than by will, intestate succession, or trust.

(2) Any action that involves a concurrent jurisdiction subject matter and that is before the probate court may be transferred by the probate court, on its order, to the general division of the court of common pleas.

(3) Notwithstanding that the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction to render declaratory judgments under Chapter 5817. of the Revised Code, the probate court may transfer the proceeding to the general division of the court of common pleas pursuant to division (A) of section 5817.04 of the Revised Code.

(C) The probate court has plenary power at law and in equity to dispose fully of any matter that is properly before the court, unless the power is expressly otherwise limited or denied by a section of the Revised Code.

(D) The jurisdiction acquired by a probate court over a matter or proceeding is exclusive of that of any other probate court, except when otherwise provided by law.

Last updated February 3, 2025 at 3:27 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 265 cases (55 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case: Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 7× “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
State ex rel. Reynolds v. Kirby, 2023 Ohio 782 (Ohio 2023). · cites it 6× “The primary statute conferring jurisdiction on probate courts, R.C. 2101.24, grants them exclusive jurisdiction over numerous matters relating to probate estates, guardianships, trusts, and postdeath disputes.”
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022 Ohio 2441 (Ohio 2022). · cites it 11× “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Sosnoswsky v. Koscianski, 2018 Ohio 3045 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 9× “On July 31, 2017, prior to the October 31, 2017 dismissal of her probate court complaint, the general division trial court granted the motion to dismiss, holding, in part: Pursuant to R.C. 2101.24, it is well settled that the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, unless…”
State ex rel. Lewis v. Moser, 647 N.E.2d 155 (Ohio 1995). · cites it 6× “Relators argue that Judge Powell has no authority to adjudicate Counts II and IV of their complaint because the probate court’s limited jurisdiction under R.C. 2101.24 1 does not include claims for compensatory and punitive *27 damages.”
State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cnty. Prob. Court, 753 N.E.2d 192 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 4× “56 as well as their additional exclusive and plenary authority under R.C. 2101.24(A)(2) and (C). R.C. 2109.50 to 2109.”
Wozniak v. Wozniak, 629 N.E.2d 500 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “Assignment of Error 3 “The trial court erred in granting jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act and misapplying the Act to the case at bar.” Wozniak’s third assignment of error challenges the jurisdiction of the probate court in a declaratory judgment action.”
In re Guardianship of Spangler, 2010 Ohio 2471 (Ohio 2010). · cites it 4× “{¶ 50} “* * * {¶ 51} “(C) The probate court has plenary power at law and in equity to dispose fully of any matter that is properly before the court, unless the power is expressly otherwise limited or denied by a section of the Revised Code.”
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022 Ohio 4235 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 6× “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014 Ohio 2995 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
Wiggins v. Safeco, 2019 Ohio 312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 13× “Wiggins argues that the probate court here had exclusive jurisdiction over his action under R.”
Grimes v. Grimes, 879 N.E.2d 247 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 5× “05(C) provides that “[a]ny person interested as or through an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, creditor, devisee, legatee, heir, next of kin, or cestui que trust, in the administration * * * of the estate of a decedent * * * may have a declaration…”
Show all 265 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(0) — 1 case
Bishop v. Bishop, 934 N.E.2d 420 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(1)(k) — 1 case
In re Est. of Devine v. Monroe Soc. for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, 2025 Ohio 1523 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A) — 18 cases
Corron v. Corron, 531 N.E.2d 708 (Ohio 1988).
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022 Ohio 4235 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022 Ohio 2441 (Ohio 2022). “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Prokos v. Hines, 2014 Ohio 1415 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Rieser v. Rieser, 947 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1) — 15 cases
In re Guardianship of Stein, 2004 Ohio 7114 (Ohio 2004).
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022 Ohio 2441 (Ohio 2022). “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014 Ohio 2995 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2022 Ohio 2053 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Rieser v. Rieser, 947 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(1) — 1 case
Bishop v. Bishop, 934 N.E.2d 420 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(I) — 1 case
Est. of Welch v. Taylor, 2020 Ohio 6909 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(a) — 6 cases
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
Bishop v. Bishop, 934 N.E.2d 420 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
In re Est. of Taylor, 2024 Ohio 1496 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Dilley, 2018 Ohio 1504 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Lynch v. Fig Oh18, L.L.C., 2025 Ohio 1553 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(aa)(bb) — 1 case
Hoelzer v. Kacachos, 2025 Ohio 4506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(b) — 5 cases
State ex rel. Lee v. Trumbull Cnty. Prob. Court, 700 N.E.2d 4 (Ohio 1998).
Johnson v. Allen, 655 N.E.2d 240 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995).
In re Est. of Parks, 2024 Ohio 1841 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State ex rel. Lee v. Trumbull Cty. Prob. Court, 1998 Ohio 51 (Ohio 1998).
In re Est. of Torbett, 2017 Ohio 417 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(c) — 33 cases
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022 Ohio 2441 (Ohio 2022). “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Grimes v. Grimes, 879 N.E.2d 247 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “05(C) provides that “[a]ny person interested as or through an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, creditor, devisee, legatee, heir, next of kin, or cestui que trust, in the administration * * * of the estate of a decedent * * * may have a declaration…”
Sosnoswsky v. Koscianski, 2018 Ohio 3045 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “On July 31, 2017, prior to the October 31, 2017 dismissal of her probate court complaint, the general division trial court granted the motion to dismiss, holding, in part: Pursuant to R.C. 2101.24, it is well settled that the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, unless…”
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022 Ohio 4235 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Widok v. Est. of Wolf, 2020 Ohio 5178 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(d) — 7 cases
In re Guardianship of Jadwisiak, 593 N.E.2d 1379 (Ohio 1992).
Rinehart v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A., 709 N.E.2d 559 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).
Johnson v. Allen, 655 N.E.2d 240 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995).
In Re Guardianship of Derakhshan, 673 N.E.2d 954 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
In Re Guardianship of McPheter, 642 N.E.2d 690 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(dd) — 3 cases
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024 Ohio 5393 (Ohio 2024).
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024 Ohio 5393 (Ohio 2024).
Marszal v. Catholic Cemeteries Assn. of the Diocese of Cleveland, 2025 Ohio 2398 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(e) — 24 cases
State ex rel. Est. of Hards v. Klammer, 850 N.E.2d 1197 (Ohio 2006).
Progressive Macedonia, L.L.C. v. Shepherd, 2021 Ohio 792 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In Re Guardianship of Thomas, 771 N.E.2d 882 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
State ex rel. Chester Twp. v. Grendell (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 1520 (Ohio 2016).
In re Guardianship of Bakhtiar, 2016 Ohio 8199 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(f) — 1 case
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024 Ohio 5393 (Ohio 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(g) — 1 case
Carney v. Olmsted Operator, L.L.C., 2022 Ohio 1585 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(h) — 1 case
In re Roudebush Trust, 2021 Ohio 4557 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(i) — 3 cases
In re Est. of Porter, 2017 Ohio 8840 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Francati v. Fuentes, 2024 Ohio 5095 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Gates v. Werren, 2025 Ohio 2667 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(k) — 5 cases
Widok v. Est. of Wolf, 2020 Ohio 5178 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Common Pleas Court, 74 Ohio St. 3d 19 (Ohio 1995).
In re Est. of Goubeaux, 2023 Ohio 647 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Prob. Div., 1995 Ohio 96 (Ohio 1995).
Oakar v. Ohio Dep't of Mental Retardation, 623 N.E.2d 1296 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(l) — 13 cases
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024 Ohio 5393 (Ohio 2024).
Grimes v. Grimes, 879 N.E.2d 247 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “05(C) provides that “[a]ny person interested as or through an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, creditor, devisee, legatee, heir, next of kin, or cestui que trust, in the administration * * * of the estate of a decedent * * * may have a declaration…”
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022 Ohio 4235 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Harrison v. Faseyitan, 823 N.E.2d 925 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
Zimmerman v. Montgomery Co. Pub. Health Dept., 2016 Ohio 1423 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(m) — 6 cases
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
Schiavoni v. Roy, 2012 Ohio 4435 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Est. of Welch v. Taylor, 2020 Ohio 6909 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re Est. of Damschroder, 2021 Ohio 1558 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Jamison v. Jamison, 2018 Ohio 1626 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(n) — 1 case
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022 Ohio 2441 (Ohio 2022). “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(p) — 9 cases
Powell v. Williams, 2022 Ohio 526 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024 Ohio 5393 (Ohio 2024).
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022 Ohio 4235 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Vondrasek v. Heiss, 2024 Ohio 3061 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Daubel v. Dineen, 2012 Ohio 5924 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(r) — 2 cases
Johnson v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Fam. Servs., 2023 Ohio 4629 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Gates v. Werren, 2025 Ohio 2667 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(u) — 1 case
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014 Ohio 2995 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(2) — 11 cases
State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cnty. Prob. Court, 753 N.E.2d 192 (Ohio 2001). “56 as well as their additional exclusive and plenary authority under R.C. 2101.24(A)(2) and (C). R.C. 2109.50 to 2109.”
Zimmerman v. Montgomery Co. Pub. Health Dept., 2016 Ohio 1423 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cty. Prob. Court, 2001 Ohio 1297 (Ohio 2001).
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2022 Ohio 2053 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Wiggins v. Safeco, 2019 Ohio 312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Wiggins argues that the probate court here had exclusive jurisdiction over his action under R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(2)(a) — 4 cases
State ex rel. McGirr v. Winkler (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 8046 (Ohio 2017).
Slater v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr., 2018 Ohio 1475 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Ohio Dep't of Mental Health v. Clermont Cnty. Alcohol, Drug Addiction & Mental Health Servs. Bd., 639 N.E.2d 433 (Ohio 1994).
In re Hays, 1995 Ohio 46 (Ohio 1995).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(4) — 2 cases
In Re Miller, 515 N.E.2d 635 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986).
In Re Guardianship of Harrison, 572 N.E.2d 855 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(T)(k) — 1 case
First Nat'l Bank v. Miami Univ., 699 N.E.2d 523 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l) — 1 case
Sayer v. Epler, 699 N.E.2d 1000 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(j) — 1 case
First Nat'l Bank v. Miami Univ., 699 N.E.2d 523 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(k) — 4 cases
Wozniak v. Wozniak, 629 N.E.2d 500 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993). “Assignment of Error 3 “The trial court erred in granting jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act and misapplying the Act to the case at bar.” Wozniak’s third assignment of error challenges the jurisdiction of the probate court in a declaratory judgment action.”
Grimes v. Grimes, 879 N.E.2d 247 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “05(C) provides that “[a]ny person interested as or through an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, creditor, devisee, legatee, heir, next of kin, or cestui que trust, in the administration * * * of the estate of a decedent * * * may have a declaration…”
Est. of Snell v. Kilburn, 846 N.E.2d 572 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
Sayer v. Epler, 699 N.E.2d 1000 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(p) — 1 case
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(s) — 1 case
Johnson v. Allen, 655 N.E.2d 240 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(t) — 1 case
Cleveland v. Ohio Dep't of Mental Health, 618 N.E.2d 244 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B) — 8 cases
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022 Ohio 4235 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014 Ohio 2995 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
In Re Est. of Ross, 583 N.E.2d 1379 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).
Carnahan v. Stallman, 504 N.E.2d 1218 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986).
Pnc Bank v. Roy, 788 N.E.2d 650 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1) — 9 cases
State ex rel. Reynolds v. Kirby, 2023 Ohio 782 (Ohio 2023). “The primary statute conferring jurisdiction on probate courts, R.C. 2101.24, grants them exclusive jurisdiction over numerous matters relating to probate estates, guardianships, trusts, and postdeath disputes.”
In re Guardianship of Lombardo, 716 N.E.2d 189 (Ohio 1999).
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
Sosnoswsky v. Koscianski, 2018 Ohio 3045 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “On July 31, 2017, prior to the October 31, 2017 dismissal of her probate court complaint, the general division trial court granted the motion to dismiss, holding, in part: Pursuant to R.C. 2101.24, it is well settled that the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, unless…”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014 Ohio 2995 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(a) — 2 cases
State ex rel. Reynolds v. Kirby, 2023 Ohio 782 (Ohio 2023). “The primary statute conferring jurisdiction on probate courts, R.C. 2101.24, grants them exclusive jurisdiction over numerous matters relating to probate estates, guardianships, trusts, and postdeath disputes.”
Wiggins v. Safeco, 2019 Ohio 312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Wiggins argues that the probate court here had exclusive jurisdiction over his action under R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(b) — 19 cases
Schiavoni v. Roy, 2012 Ohio 4435 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Revocable Living Trust of Mandel v. Lake Erie Util. Co., 2012 Ohio 5718 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Galloway v. Galloway, 2017 Ohio 87 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Wozniak v. Wozniak, 629 N.E.2d 500 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993). “Assignment of Error 3 “The trial court erred in granting jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act and misapplying the Act to the case at bar.” Wozniak’s third assignment of error challenges the jurisdiction of the probate court in a declaratory judgment action.”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014 Ohio 2995 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c) — 1 case
Ross v. Hornack, 2013 Ohio 1901 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c)(4) — 1 case
DeChellis v. Est. of DeChellis, 2020 Ohio 5111 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c)(i) — 3 cases
Wiggins v. Safeco, 2019 Ohio 312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Wiggins argues that the probate court here had exclusive jurisdiction over his action under R.”
Fifth Third Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Leveck, 2022 Ohio 546 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re Est. of Harries, 2018 Ohio 3725 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c)(iv) — 1 case
Hoelzer v. Kacachos, 2025 Ohio 4506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c)(v) — 1 case
Hoelzer v. Kacachos, 2025 Ohio 4506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(2) — 2 cases
White v. White, 2021 Ohio 3488 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Worrall ex rel. Worrall v. Irwin, 890 F. Supp. 696 (S.D. Ohio 1994).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(C) — 75 cases
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
In re Guardianship of Spangler, 2010 Ohio 2471 (Ohio 2010). “{¶ 50} “* * * {¶ 51} “(C) The probate court has plenary power at law and in equity to dispose fully of any matter that is properly before the court, unless the power is expressly otherwise limited or denied by a section of the Revised Code.”
Goldberg v. Maloney, 855 N.E.2d 856 (Ohio 2006).
Rheinhold v. Reichek, 2014 Ohio 31 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Kniskern v. Twp. of Somerford, 678 N.E.2d 273 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(D) — 3 cases
Masitto v. Masitto, 488 N.E.2d 857 (Ohio 1986).
Caudill v. Caudill, 502 N.E.2d 703 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986).
Gorenflo v. Ohio Dep't of Human Servs., 611 N.E.2d 425 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(W) — 1 case
In re Guardianship of Thomas, 2016 Ohio 7793 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(c) — 1 case
Friedman v. Friedman, 2 Ohio App. Unrep. 509 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.