Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24 (2026)

Jurisdiction of probate court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A)(1) Except as otherwise provided by law, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction:

(a) To take the proof of wills and to admit to record authenticated copies of wills executed, proved, and allowed in the courts of any other state, territory, or country. If the probate judge is unavoidably absent, any judge of the court of common pleas may take proof of wills and approve bonds to be given, but the record of these acts shall be preserved in the usual records of the probate court.

(b) To grant and revoke letters testamentary and of administration;

(c) To direct and control the conduct and settle the accounts of executors and administrators and order the distribution of estates;

(d) To appoint the attorney general to serve as the administrator of an estate pursuant to section 2113.06 of the Revised Code;

(e) To appoint and remove guardians, conservators, and testamentary trustees, direct and control their conduct, and settle their accounts;

(f) To grant marriage licenses;

(g) To make inquests respecting persons who are so mentally impaired as a result of a mental or physical illness or disability, as a result of intellectual disability, or as a result of chronic substance abuse, that they are unable to manage their property and affairs effectively, subject to guardianship;

(h) To qualify assignees, appoint and qualify trustees and commissioners of insolvents, control their conduct, and settle their accounts;

(i) To authorize the sale of lands, equitable estates, or interests in lands or equitable estates, and the assignments of inchoate dower in such cases of sale, on petition by executors, administrators, and guardians;

(j) To authorize the completion of real property contracts on petition of executors and administrators;

(k) To construe wills;

(l) To render declaratory judgments, including, but not limited to, those rendered pursuant to Chapter 5817. of the Revised Code;

(m) To direct and control the conduct of fiduciaries and settle their accounts;

(n) To authorize the sale or lease of any estate created by will if the estate is held in trust, on petition by the trustee;

(o) To terminate a testamentary trust in any case in which a court of equity may do so;

(p) To hear and determine actions to contest the validity of wills;

(q) To make a determination of the presumption of death of missing persons and to adjudicate the property rights and obligations of all parties affected by the presumption;

(r) To act for and issue orders regarding wards pursuant to section 2111.50 of the Revised Code;

(s) To hear and determine actions against sureties on the bonds of fiduciaries appointed by the probate court;

(t) To hear and determine actions involving informed consent for medication of persons hospitalized pursuant to section 5122.141 or 5122.15 of the Revised Code;

(u) To hear and determine actions relating to durable powers of attorney for health care as described in division (D) of section 1337.16 of the Revised Code;

(v) To hear and determine actions commenced by objecting individuals, in accordance with section 2133.05 of the Revised Code;

(w) To hear and determine complaints that pertain to the use or continuation, or the withholding or withdrawal, of life-sustaining treatment in connection with certain patients allegedly in a terminal condition or in a permanently unconscious state pursuant to division (E) of section 2133.08 of the Revised Code, in accordance with that division;

(x) To hear and determine applications that pertain to the withholding or withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from certain patients allegedly in a permanently unconscious state pursuant to section 2133.09 of the Revised Code, in accordance with that section;

(y) To hear and determine applications of attending physicians in accordance with division (B) of section 2133.15 of the Revised Code;

(z) To hear and determine actions relative to the use or continuation of comfort care in connection with certain principals under durable powers of attorney for health care, declarants under declarations, or patients in accordance with division (E) of either section 1337.16 or 2133.12 of the Revised Code;

(aa) To hear and determine applications for an order relieving an estate from administration under section 2113.03 of the Revised Code;

(bb) To hear and determine applications for an order granting a summary release from administration under section 2113.031 of the Revised Code;

(cc) To hear and determine actions relating to the exercise of the right of disposition, in accordance with section 2108.90 of the Revised Code;

(dd) To hear and determine actions relating to the disinterment and reinterment of human remains under section 517.23 of the Revised Code;

(ee) To hear and determine petitions for an order for treatment of a person experiencing alcohol and other drug abuse filed under section 5119.93 of the Revised Code and to order treatment of that nature in accordance with, and take other actions afforded to the court under, sections 5119.90 to 5119.98 of the Revised Code;

(ff) To hear and determine petitions for adoption.

(2) In addition to the exclusive jurisdiction conferred upon the probate court by division (A)(1) of this section, the probate court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over a particular subject matter if both of the following apply:

(a) Another section of the Revised Code expressly confers jurisdiction over that subject matter upon the probate court.

(b) No section of the Revised Code expressly confers jurisdiction over that subject matter upon any other court or agency.

(B)(1) The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as, the general division of the court of common pleas to issue writs and orders, and to hear and determine actions as follows:

(a) If jurisdiction relative to a particular subject matter is stated to be concurrent in a section of the Revised Code or has been construed by judicial decision to be concurrent, any action that involves that subject matter;

(b) Any action that involves an inter vivos trust; a trust created pursuant to section 5815.28 of the Revised Code; a charitable trust or foundation; subject to divisions (A)(1)(t) and (y) of this section, a power of attorney, including, but not limited to, a durable power of attorney; the medical treatment of a competent adult; or a writ of habeas corpus;

(c) Subject to section 2101.31 of the Revised Code, any action with respect to a probate estate, guardianship, trust, or post-death dispute that involves any of the following:

(i) A designation or removal of a beneficiary of a life insurance policy, annuity contract, retirement plan, brokerage account, security account, bank account, real property, or tangible personal property;

(ii) A designation or removal of a payable-on-death beneficiary or transfer-on-death beneficiary;

(iii) A change in the title to any asset involving a joint and survivorship interest;

(iv) An alleged gift;

(v) The passing of assets upon the death of an individual otherwise than by will, intestate succession, or trust.

(2) Any action that involves a concurrent jurisdiction subject matter and that is before the probate court may be transferred by the probate court, on its order, to the general division of the court of common pleas.

(3) Notwithstanding that the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction to render declaratory judgments under Chapter 5817. of the Revised Code, the probate court may transfer the proceeding to the general division of the court of common pleas pursuant to division (A) of section 5817.04 of the Revised Code.

(C) The probate court has plenary power at law and in equity to dispose fully of any matter that is properly before the court, unless the power is expressly otherwise limited or denied by a section of the Revised Code.

(D) The jurisdiction acquired by a probate court over a matter or proceeding is exclusive of that of any other probate court, except when otherwise provided by law.

Last updated February 3, 2025 at 3:27 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 265 cases (55 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case: Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2004). · cites it 7× “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
State ex rel. Reynolds v. Kirby, 2023-Ohio-782, 223 N.E.3d 417. · cites it 6× “The primary statute conferring jurisdiction on probate courts, R.C. 2101.24, grants them exclusive jurisdiction over numerous matters relating to probate estates, guardianships, trusts, and postdeath disputes.”
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022-Ohio-2441, 198 N.E.3d 87. · cites it 11× “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Sosnoswsky v. Koscianski, 2018-Ohio-3045, 118 N.E.3d 403. · cites it 9× “On July 31, 2017, prior to the October 31, 2017 dismissal of her probate court complaint, the general division trial court granted the motion to dismiss, holding, in part: Pursuant to R.C. 2101.24, it is well settled that the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, unless…”
State ex rel. Lewis v. Moser, 647 N.E.2d 155 (Ohio 1995). · cites it 6× “Relators argue that Judge Powell has no authority to adjudicate Counts II and IV of their complaint because the probate court’s limited jurisdiction under R.C. 2101.24 1 does not include claims for compensatory and punitive *27 damages.”
State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cnty. Prob. Court, 753 N.E.2d 192 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 4× “56 as well as their additional exclusive and plenary authority under R.C. 2101.24(A)(2) and (C). R.C. 2109.50 to 2109.”
Wozniak v. Wozniak, 629 N.E.2d 500 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1993). · cites it 3× “Assignment of Error 3 “The trial court erred in granting jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act and misapplying the Act to the case at bar.” Wozniak’s third assignment of error challenges the jurisdiction of the probate court in a declaratory judgment action.”
In re Guardianship of Spangler, 2010-Ohio-2471, 933 N.E.2d 1067. · cites it 4× “{¶ 50} “* * * {¶ 51} “(C) The probate court has plenary power at law and in equity to dispose fully of any matter that is properly before the court, unless the power is expressly otherwise limited or denied by a section of the Revised Code.”
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022-Ohio-4235, 201 N.E.3d 1021. · cites it 6× “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014-Ohio-2995, 15 N.E.3d 401. · cites it 8× “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
Wiggins v. Safeco, 2019-Ohio-312. · cites it 13× “Wiggins argues that the probate court here had exclusive jurisdiction over his action under R.”
Grimes v. Grimes, 879 N.E.2d 247 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2007). · cites it 5× “05(C) provides that “[a]ny person interested as or through an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, creditor, devisee, legatee, heir, next of kin, or cestui que trust, in the administration * * * of the estate of a decedent * * * may have a declaration…”
Show all 265 citing cases →
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(0): 1 case
Bishop v. Bishop, 934 N.E.2d 420 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2010).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(1)(k): 1 case
In re Est. of Devine v. Monroe Soc. for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, 2025-Ohio-1523.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A): 18 cases
Corron v. Corron, 531 N.E.2d 708 (Ohio 1988).
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022-Ohio-4235, 201 N.E.3d 1021. “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022-Ohio-2441, 198 N.E.3d 87. “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Prokos v. Hines, 2014-Ohio-1415.
Rieser v. Rieser, 947 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2010).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1): 15 cases
In re Guardianship of Stein, 2004-Ohio-7114, 821 N.E.2d 1008.
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022-Ohio-2441, 198 N.E.3d 87. “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014-Ohio-2995, 15 N.E.3d 401. “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2022-Ohio-2053, 191 N.E.3d 530.
Rieser v. Rieser, 947 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2010).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(1): 1 case
Bishop v. Bishop, 934 N.E.2d 420 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2010).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(I): 1 case
Est. of Welch v. Taylor, 2020-Ohio-6909.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(a): 6 cases
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
Bishop v. Bishop, 934 N.E.2d 420 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2010).
In re Est. of Taylor, 2024-Ohio-1496.
State v. Dilley, 2018-Ohio-1504.
Lynch v. Fig Oh18, L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-1553.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(aa)(bb): 1 case
Hoelzer v. Kacachos, 2025-Ohio-4506.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(b): 5 cases
State ex rel. Lee v. Trumbull Cnty. Prob. Court, 700 N.E.2d 4 (Ohio 1998).
Johnson v. Allen, 655 N.E.2d 240 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1995).
In re Est. of Parks, 2024-Ohio-1841.
State ex rel. Lee v. Trumbull Cty. Prob. Court, 83 Ohio St. 3d 369 (Ohio 1998).
In re Est. of Torbett, 2017-Ohio-417.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(c): 33 cases
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022-Ohio-2441, 198 N.E.3d 87. “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Grimes v. Grimes, 879 N.E.2d 247 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2007). “05(C) provides that “[a]ny person interested as or through an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, creditor, devisee, legatee, heir, next of kin, or cestui que trust, in the administration * * * of the estate of a decedent * * * may have a declaration…”
Sosnoswsky v. Koscianski, 2018-Ohio-3045, 118 N.E.3d 403. “On July 31, 2017, prior to the October 31, 2017 dismissal of her probate court complaint, the general division trial court granted the motion to dismiss, holding, in part: Pursuant to R.C. 2101.24, it is well settled that the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, unless…”
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022-Ohio-4235, 201 N.E.3d 1021. “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Widok v. Est. of Wolf, 2020-Ohio-5178.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(d): 7 cases
In re Guardianship of Jadwisiak, 593 N.E.2d 1379 (Ohio 1992).
Rinehart v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A., 709 N.E.2d 559 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1998).
Johnson v. Allen, 655 N.E.2d 240 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1995).
In Re Guardianship of Derakhshan, 673 N.E.2d 954 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 1996).
In Re Guardianship of McPheter, 642 N.E.2d 690 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 1994).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(dd): 3 cases
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024-Ohio-5393.
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024-Ohio-5393, 177 Ohio St. 3d 281.
Marszal v. Catholic Cemeteries Assn. of the Diocese of Cleveland, 2025-Ohio-2398.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(e): 24 cases
State ex rel. Est. of Hards v. Klammer, 850 N.E.2d 1197 (Ohio 2006).
Progressive Macedonia, L.L.C. v. Shepherd, 2021-Ohio-792.
In Re Guardianship of Thomas, 771 N.E.2d 882 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 2002).
State ex rel. Chester Twp. v. Grendell (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-1520, 66 N.E.3d 683.
In re Guardianship of Bakhtiar, 2016-Ohio-8199.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(f): 1 case
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024-Ohio-5393.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(g): 1 case
Carney v. Olmsted Operator, L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-1585.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(h): 1 case
In re Roudebush Trust, 2021-Ohio-4557.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(i): 3 cases
In re Est. of Porter, 2017-Ohio-8840, 100 N.E.3d 1080.
Francati v. Fuentes, 2024-Ohio-5095.
Gates v. Werren, 2025-Ohio-2667.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(k): 5 cases
Widok v. Est. of Wolf, 2020-Ohio-5178.
State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Common Pleas Court, 74 Ohio St. 3d 19 (Ohio 1995).
In re Est. of Goubeaux, 2023-Ohio-647, 209 N.E.3d 967.
State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Prob. Div., 74 Ohio St. 3d 19 (Ohio 1995).
Oakar v. Ohio Dep't of Mental Retardation, 623 N.E.2d 1296 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1993).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(l): 13 cases
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024-Ohio-5393.
Grimes v. Grimes, 879 N.E.2d 247 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2007). “05(C) provides that “[a]ny person interested as or through an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, creditor, devisee, legatee, heir, next of kin, or cestui que trust, in the administration * * * of the estate of a decedent * * * may have a declaration…”
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022-Ohio-4235, 201 N.E.3d 1021. “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Harrison v. Faseyitan, 823 N.E.2d 925 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2004).
Zimmerman v. Montgomery Co. Pub. Health Dept., 2016-Ohio-1423.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(m): 6 cases
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
Schiavoni v. Roy, 2012-Ohio-4435.
Est. of Welch v. Taylor, 2020-Ohio-6909.
In re Est. of Damschroder, 2021-Ohio-1558, 171 N.E.3d 1272.
Jamison v. Jamison, 2018-Ohio-1626.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(n): 1 case
Santomauro v. McLaughlin, 2022-Ohio-2441, 198 N.E.3d 87. “The coexecutors claim that R.C. 2101.24 is such a statute. {¶ 17} “In enacting R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(p): 9 cases
Powell v. Williams, 2022-Ohio-526, 185 N.E.3d 595.
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2024-Ohio-5393.
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022-Ohio-4235, 201 N.E.3d 1021. “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Vondrasek v. Heiss, 2024-Ohio-3061, 249 N.E.3d 412.
Daubel v. Dineen, 2012-Ohio-5924.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(r): 2 cases
Johnson v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Fam. Servs., 2023-Ohio-4629, 232 N.E.3d 261.
Gates v. Werren, 2025-Ohio-2667.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(1)(u): 1 case
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014-Ohio-2995, 15 N.E.3d 401. “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(2): 11 cases
State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cnty. Prob. Court, 753 N.E.2d 192 (Ohio 2001). “56 as well as their additional exclusive and plenary authority under R.C. 2101.24(A)(2) and (C). R.C. 2109.50 to 2109.”
Zimmerman v. Montgomery Co. Pub. Health Dept., 2016-Ohio-1423.
State ex rel. Goldberg v. Mahoning Cty. Prob. Court, 93 Ohio St. 3d 160 (Ohio 2001).
In re Application for Corr. of Birth Record of Adelaide, 2022-Ohio-2053, 191 N.E.3d 530.
Wiggins v. Safeco, 2019-Ohio-312. “Wiggins argues that the probate court here had exclusive jurisdiction over his action under R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(2)(a): 4 cases
State ex rel. McGirr v. Winkler (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-8046, 93 N.E.3d 928.
Slater v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr., 2018-Ohio-1475, 111 N.E.3d 492.
Ohio Dep't of Mental Health v. Clermont Cnty. Alcohol, Drug Addiction & Mental Health Servs. Bd., 639 N.E.2d 433 (Ohio 1994).
In re Hays, 70 Ohio St. 3d 471 (Ohio 1995).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(4): 2 cases
In Re Miller, 515 N.E.2d 635 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1986).
In Re Guardianship of Harrison, 572 N.E.2d 855 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1989).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(T)(k): 1 case
First Nat'l Bank v. Miami Univ., 699 N.E.2d 523 (Ohio Ct. App. 12th Dist. 1997).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l): 1 case
Sayer v. Epler, 699 N.E.2d 1000 (Ohio Ct. App. 5th Dist. 1997).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(j): 1 case
First Nat'l Bank v. Miami Univ., 699 N.E.2d 523 (Ohio Ct. App. 12th Dist. 1997).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(k): 4 cases
Wozniak v. Wozniak, 629 N.E.2d 500 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1993). “Assignment of Error 3 “The trial court erred in granting jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act and misapplying the Act to the case at bar.” Wozniak’s third assignment of error challenges the jurisdiction of the probate court in a declaratory judgment action.”
Grimes v. Grimes, 879 N.E.2d 247 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2007). “05(C) provides that “[a]ny person interested as or through an executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary, creditor, devisee, legatee, heir, next of kin, or cestui que trust, in the administration * * * of the estate of a decedent * * * may have a declaration…”
Est. of Snell v. Kilburn, 846 N.E.2d 572 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2005).
Sayer v. Epler, 699 N.E.2d 1000 (Ohio Ct. App. 5th Dist. 1997).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(p): 1 case
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(s): 1 case
Johnson v. Allen, 655 N.E.2d 240 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1995).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(A)(l)(t): 1 case
Cleveland v. Ohio Dep't of Mental Health, 618 N.E.2d 244 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1992).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B): 8 cases
Thomas v. Delgado, 2022-Ohio-4235, 201 N.E.3d 1021. “Generally, the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction over all matters set forth under R.C. 2101.24(A), all matters pertaining to the administration of estates, all matters pertaining to a guardian and his or her ward, and to all matters “touching the guardianship.”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014-Ohio-2995, 15 N.E.3d 401. “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
In Re Est. of Ross, 583 N.E.2d 1379 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 1989).
Carnahan v. Stallman, 504 N.E.2d 1218 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1986).
Pnc Bank v. Roy, 788 N.E.2d 650 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2003).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1): 9 cases
State ex rel. Reynolds v. Kirby, 2023-Ohio-782, 223 N.E.3d 417. “The primary statute conferring jurisdiction on probate courts, R.C. 2101.24, grants them exclusive jurisdiction over numerous matters relating to probate estates, guardianships, trusts, and postdeath disputes.”
In re Guardianship of Lombardo, 716 N.E.2d 189 (Ohio 1999).
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
Sosnoswsky v. Koscianski, 2018-Ohio-3045, 118 N.E.3d 403. “On July 31, 2017, prior to the October 31, 2017 dismissal of her probate court complaint, the general division trial court granted the motion to dismiss, holding, in part: Pursuant to R.C. 2101.24, it is well settled that the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, unless…”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014-Ohio-2995, 15 N.E.3d 401. “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(a): 2 cases
State ex rel. Reynolds v. Kirby, 2023-Ohio-782, 223 N.E.3d 417. “The primary statute conferring jurisdiction on probate courts, R.C. 2101.24, grants them exclusive jurisdiction over numerous matters relating to probate estates, guardianships, trusts, and postdeath disputes.”
Wiggins v. Safeco, 2019-Ohio-312. “Wiggins argues that the probate court here had exclusive jurisdiction over his action under R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(b): 19 cases
Schiavoni v. Roy, 2012-Ohio-4435.
Revocable Living Trust of Mandel v. Lake Erie Util. Co., 2012-Ohio-5718.
Galloway v. Galloway, 2017-Ohio-87, 80 N.E.3d 1225.
Wozniak v. Wozniak, 629 N.E.2d 500 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1993). “Assignment of Error 3 “The trial court erred in granting jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act and misapplying the Act to the case at bar.” Wozniak’s third assignment of error challenges the jurisdiction of the probate court in a declaratory judgment action.”
Cartwright v. Batner, 2014-Ohio-2995, 15 N.E.3d 401. “21 {¶ 52} As was noted, R.C. 2101.24 deals with the jurisdiction of probate courts.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c): 1 case
Ross v. Hornack, 2013-Ohio-1901.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c)(4): 1 case
DeChellis v. Est. of DeChellis, 2020-Ohio-5111.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c)(i): 3 cases
Wiggins v. Safeco, 2019-Ohio-312. “Wiggins argues that the probate court here had exclusive jurisdiction over his action under R.”
Fifth Third Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Leveck, 2022-Ohio-546, 185 N.E.3d 641.
In re Est. of Harries, 2018-Ohio-3725.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c)(iv): 1 case
Hoelzer v. Kacachos, 2025-Ohio-4506.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(1)(c)(v): 1 case
Hoelzer v. Kacachos, 2025-Ohio-4506.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(B)(2): 2 cases
White v. White, 2021-Ohio-3488.
Worrall ex rel. Worrall v. Irwin, 890 F. Supp. 696 (S.D. Ohio 1994).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(C): 75 cases
Roll v. Edwards, 805 N.E.2d 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2004). “In addition to those matters over which the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction, R.C. 2101.24(B)(1) provides: “The probate court has concurrent jurisdiction with, and the same powers at law and in equity as,' the general division of the court of common pleas * * * to hear…”
In re Guardianship of Spangler, 2010-Ohio-2471, 933 N.E.2d 1067. “{¶ 50} “* * * {¶ 51} “(C) The probate court has plenary power at law and in equity to dispose fully of any matter that is properly before the court, unless the power is expressly otherwise limited or denied by a section of the Revised Code.”
Goldberg v. Maloney, 855 N.E.2d 856 (Ohio 2006).
Rheinhold v. Reichek, 2014-Ohio-31.
Kniskern v. Twp. of Somerford, 678 N.E.2d 273 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1996).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(D): 3 cases
Masitto v. Masitto, 488 N.E.2d 857 (Ohio 1986).
Caudill v. Caudill, 502 N.E.2d 703 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1986).
Gorenflo v. Ohio Dep't of Human Servs., 611 N.E.2d 425 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1992).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(W): 1 case
In re Guardianship of Thomas, 2016-Ohio-7793.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2101.24(c): 1 case
Friedman v. Friedman, 2 Ohio App. Unrep. 509 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1990).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.