Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2108.40 (2026)

Definition of death

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An individual is dead if the individual has sustained either irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions or irreversible cessation of all functions of the brain, including the brain stem, as determined in accordance with accepted medical standards. If the respiratory and circulatory functions of a person are being artificially sustained, under accepted medical standards a determination that death has occurred is made by a physician by observing and conducting a test to determine that the irreversible cessation of all functions of the brain has occurred.

A physician who makes a determination of death in accordance with this section and accepted medical standards is not liable for damages in any civil action or subject to prosecution in any criminal proceeding for the physician's acts or the acts of others based on that determination.

Any person who acts in good faith in reliance on a determination of death made by a physician in accordance with this section and accepted medical standards is not liable for damages in any civil action or subject to prosecution in any criminal proceeding for the person's actions.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2022 · leading case: White v. Bhatt, 2017-Ohio-9277, 102 N.E.3d 607.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
White v. Bhatt, 2017-Ohio-9277, 102 N.E.3d 607. · cites it 4× “appeals the same judgment entry, which failed to address his argument he was immune from liability pursuant to R.C. 2108.40. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE {¶ 2} On March 13, 2013, Cheri White ("Decedent"), Appellants' mother, was transported to Appellee MedCentral Health…”
State ex rel. Waste Mgt. of Ohio, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2022-Ohio-4581, 215 N.E.3d 512. “” R.C. 2108.40; accord R.C. 2105.35(A)(1). The SHO cited no evidence that Gelhausen had experienced the irreversible cessation of all brain functions, and it was undisputed that his respiratory functions had not ceased.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.