Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2109
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2109.12 (2026)

Bond conditions - guardians

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
January 13, 2012
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 124 - 129th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

Any bond required by or pursuant to section 2109.04 of the Revised Code of a guardian shall be conditioned as follows:

(A) If applicable, to make and return to the probate court within the time required by section 2111.14 of the Revised Code a true inventory of all moneys, rights, credits, other personal property, and real property belonging to the ward that come to the guardian's possession or knowledge;

(B) To administer and distribute according to law all moneys, rights, credits, other personal property, and real property belonging to the ward that come to the possession of the guardian or to the possession of any other person for the guardian;

(C) To render a just and true account of the guardian's administration at any times required by or pursuant to section 2109.302 of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1992–2011 · leading case: State v. Tinch, 616 N.E.2d 529 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Tinch, 616 N.E.2d 529 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992). “It is patently clear that R.C. 2109.12(J) was specifically enacted to rectify such an unwanted outcome.”
State v. Beebe, 2011 Ohio 681 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “It is patently clear that R.C. 2109.12(J) was specifically enacted to rectify such an unwanted outcome.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2109.12(J) — 2 cases
State v. Tinch, 616 N.E.2d 529 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992). “It is patently clear that R.C. 2109.12(J) was specifically enacted to rectify such an unwanted outcome.”
State v. Beebe, 2011 Ohio 681 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “It is patently clear that R.C. 2109.12(J) was specifically enacted to rectify such an unwanted outcome.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.