Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2151
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.19 (2026)

Summons - expense

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 1, 1953
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 1 - 100th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The summons, warrants, citations, subpoenas, and other writs of the juvenile court may issue to a probation officer of any such court or to the sheriff of any county or any marshal, constable, or police officer, and the provisions of law relating to the subpoenaing of witnesses in other cases shall apply in so far as they are applicable.

When a summons, warrant, citation, subpoena, or other writ is issued to any such officer, other than a probation officer, the expense in serving the same shall be paid by the county, township, or municipal corporation in the manner prescribed for the payment of sheriffs, deputies, assistants, and other employees.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2017 · leading case: In re S.S., 2011-Ohio-5697.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re S.S., 2011-Ohio-5697. “3d 79 , 2007-Ohio-1104 , at ¶43; R.C. 2151.19(A)(1). If before the hearing on 18 permanent custody this has not been established, then it must be established at the hearing.”
State v. Council, 2017-Ohio-9047. “Assignment of Error “The trial court erred in denying suppression by extending the ability of authorities to search, pursuant to R.C. 2151.19(F), beyond the limits of that section -4- and into a room exclusively outside of the probationer’s control, access and possession in…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.19(A)(1): 1 case
In re S.S., 2011-Ohio-5697. “3d 79 , 2007-Ohio-1104 , at ¶43; R.C. 2151.19(A)(1). If before the hearing on 18 permanent custody this has not been established, then it must be established at the hearing.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.19(F): 1 case
State v. Council, 2017-Ohio-9047. “Assignment of Error “The trial court erred in denying suppression by extending the ability of authorities to search, pursuant to R.C. 2151.19(F), beyond the limits of that section -4- and into a room exclusively outside of the probationer’s control, access and possession in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.