Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353 (2026)

Orders of disposition of abused, neglected or dependent child

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) If a child is adjudicated an abused, neglected, or dependent child, the court may make any of the following orders of disposition:

(1) Place the child in protective supervision;

(2) Commit the child to the temporary custody of any of the following:

(a) A public children services agency;

(b) A private child placing agency;

(c) Either parent;

(d) A relative residing within or outside the state;

(e) A probation officer for placement in a certified foster home;

(f) Any other person approved by the court.

(3) Award legal custody of the child to either parent or to any other person who, prior to the dispositional hearing, files a motion requesting legal custody of the child or is identified as a proposed legal custodian in a complaint or motion filed prior to the dispositional hearing by any party to the proceedings. A person identified in a complaint or motion filed by a party to the proceedings as a proposed legal custodian shall be awarded legal custody of the child only if the person identified signs a statement of understanding for legal custody that contains at least the following provisions:

(a) That it is the intent of the person to become the legal custodian of the child and the person is able to assume legal responsibility for the care and supervision of the child;

(b) That the person understands that legal custody of the child in question is intended to be permanent in nature and that the person will be responsible as the custodian for the child until the child reaches the age of majority. Responsibility as custodian for the child shall continue beyond the age of majority if, at the time the child reaches the age of majority, the child is pursuing a diploma granted by the board of education or other governing authority, successful completion of the curriculum of any high school, successful completion of an individualized education program developed for the student by any high school, or an age and schooling certificate. Responsibility beyond the age of majority shall terminate when the child ceases to continuously pursue such an education, completes such an education, or is excused from such an education under standards adopted by the department of education and workforce, whichever occurs first.

(c) That the parents of the child have residual parental rights, privileges, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, the privilege of reasonable visitation, consent to adoption, the privilege to determine the child's religious affiliation, and the responsibility for support;

(d) That the person understands that the person must be present in court for the dispositional hearing in order to affirm the person's intention to become legal custodian, to affirm that the person understands the effect of the custodianship before the court, and to answer any questions that the court or any parties to the case may have.

(4) Commit the child to the permanent custody of a public children services agency or private child placing agency, if the court determines in accordance with division (E) of section 2151.414 of the Revised Code that the child cannot be placed with one of the child's parents within a reasonable time or should not be placed with either parent and determines in accordance with division (D)(1) of section 2151.414 of the Revised Code that the permanent commitment is in the best interest of the child. If the court grants permanent custody under this division, the court, upon the request of any party, shall file a written opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law in relation to the proceeding.

(5) Place the child in a planned permanent living arrangement with a public children services agency or private child placing agency, if a public children services agency or private child placing agency requests the court to place the child in a planned permanent living arrangement and if the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that a planned permanent living arrangement is in the best interest of the child, that the child is sixteen years of age or older, and that one of the following exists:

(a) The child, because of physical, mental, or psychological problems or needs, is unable to function in a family-like setting and must remain in residential or institutional care now and for the foreseeable future beyond the date of the dispositional hearing held pursuant to section 2151.35 of the Revised Code.

(b) The parents of the child have significant physical, mental, or psychological problems and are unable to care for the child because of those problems, adoption is not in the best interest of the child, as determined in accordance with division (D)(1) of section 2151.414 of the Revised Code, and the child retains a significant and positive relationship with a parent or relative.

(c) The child has been counseled on the permanent placement options available to the child, and is unwilling to accept or unable to adapt to a permanent placement.

(6) Order the removal from the child's home until further order of the court of the person who committed abuse as described in section 2151.031 of the Revised Code against the child, who caused or allowed the child to suffer neglect as described in section 2151.03 of the Revised Code, or who is the parent, guardian, or custodian of a child who is adjudicated a dependent child and order any person not to have contact with the child or the child's siblings.

(B)(1) When making a determination on whether to place a child in a planned permanent living arrangement pursuant to division (A)(5)(b) or (c) of this section, the court shall consider all relevant information that has been presented to the court, including information gathered from the child, the child's guardian ad litem, and the public children services agency or private child placing agency.

(2) A child who is placed in a planned permanent living arrangement pursuant to division (A)(5)(b) or (c) of this section shall be placed in an independent living setting or in a family setting in which the caregiver has been provided by the agency that has custody of the child with a notice that addresses the following:

(a) The caregiver understands that the planned permanent living arrangement is intended to be permanent in nature and that the caregiver will provide a stable placement for the child through the child's emancipation or until the court releases the child from the custody of the agency, whichever occurs first.

(b) The caregiver is expected to actively participate in the youth's independent living case plan, attend agency team meetings and court hearings as appropriate, complete training, as developed and implemented under section 5103.035 of the Revised Code, related to providing the child independent living services, and assist in the child's transition into adulthood.

(3) The department of children and youth shall develop a model notice to be provided by an agency that has custody of a child to a caregiver under division (B)(2) of this section. The agency may modify the model notice to apply to the needs of the agency.

(C) No order for permanent custody or temporary custody of a child or the placement of a child in a planned permanent living arrangement shall be made pursuant to this section unless the complaint alleging the abuse, neglect, or dependency contains a prayer requesting permanent custody, temporary custody, or the placement of the child in a planned permanent living arrangement as desired, the summons served on the parents of the child contains as is appropriate a full explanation that the granting of an order for permanent custody permanently divests them of their parental rights, a full explanation that an adjudication that the child is an abused, neglected, or dependent child may result in an order of temporary custody that will cause the removal of the child from their legal custody until the court terminates the order of temporary custody or permanently divests the parents of their parental rights, or a full explanation that the granting of an order for a planned permanent living arrangement will result in the removal of the child from their legal custody if any of the conditions listed in divisions (A)(5)(a) to (c) of this section are found to exist, and the summons served on the parents contains a full explanation of their right to be represented by counsel and to have counsel appointed pursuant to Chapter 120. of the Revised Code if they are indigent.

If after making disposition as authorized by division (A)(2) of this section, a motion is filed that requests permanent custody of the child, the court may grant permanent custody of the child to the movant in accordance with section 2151.414 of the Revised Code.

(D) If the court issues an order for protective supervision pursuant to division (A)(1) of this section, the court may place any reasonable restrictions upon the child, the child's parents, guardian, or custodian, or any other person, including, but not limited to, any of the following:

(1) Order a party, within forty-eight hours after the issuance of the order, to vacate the child's home indefinitely or for a specified period of time;

(2) Order a party, a parent of the child, or a physical custodian of the child to prevent any particular person from having contact with the child;

(3) Issue an order restraining or otherwise controlling the conduct of any person which conduct would not be in the best interest of the child.

(E) As part of its dispositional order, the court shall journalize a case plan for the child. The journalized case plan shall not be changed except as provided in section 2151.412 of the Revised Code.

(F)(1) The court shall retain jurisdiction over any child for whom the court issues an order of disposition pursuant to division (A) of this section or pursuant to section 2151.414 or 2151.415 of the Revised Code until the child attains the age of eighteen years if the child does not have a developmental disability or physical impairment, the child attains the age of twenty-one years if the child has a developmental disability or physical impairment, or the child is adopted and a final decree of adoption is issued, except that the court may retain jurisdiction over the child and continue any order of disposition under division (A) of this section or under section 2151.414 or 2151.415 of the Revised Code for a specified period of time to enable the child to graduate from high school or vocational school. The court shall make an entry continuing its jurisdiction under this division in the journal.

(2) Any public children services agency, any private child placing agency, the department of children and youth, or any party, other than any parent whose parental rights with respect to the child have been terminated pursuant to an order issued under division (A)(4) of this section, by filing a motion with the court, may at any time request the court to modify or terminate any order of disposition issued pursuant to division (A) of this section or section 2151.414 or 2151.415 of the Revised Code. The court shall hold a hearing upon the motion as if the hearing were the original dispositional hearing and shall give all parties to the action and the guardian ad litem notice of the hearing pursuant to the Juvenile Rules. If applicable, the court shall comply with section 2151.42 of the Revised Code.

(G) Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, except that, upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.415 of the Revised Code, the temporary custody order shall continue and not terminate until the court issues a dispositional order under that section. In resolving the motion, the court shall not order an existing temporary custody order to continue beyond two years after the date on which the complaint was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, whichever date is earlier, regardless of whether any extensions have been previously ordered pursuant to division (D) of section 2151.415 of the Revised Code.

(H)(1) No later than one year after the earlier of the date the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed in shelter care, a party may ask the court to extend an order for protective supervision for six months or to terminate the order. A party requesting extension or termination of the order shall file a written request for the extension or termination with the court and give notice of the proposed extension or termination in writing before the end of the day after the day of filing it to all parties and the child's guardian ad litem. If a public children services agency or private child placing agency requests termination of the order, the agency shall file a written status report setting out the facts supporting termination of the order at the time it files the request with the court. If no party requests extension or termination of the order, the court shall notify the parties that the court will extend the order for six months or terminate it and that it may do so without a hearing unless one of the parties requests a hearing. All parties and the guardian ad litem shall have seven days from the date a notice is sent pursuant to this division to object to and request a hearing on the proposed extension or termination.

(a) If it receives a timely request for a hearing, the court shall schedule a hearing to be held no later than thirty days after the request is received by the court. The court shall give notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing to all parties and the guardian ad litem. At the hearing, the court shall determine whether extension or termination of the order is in the child's best interest. If termination is in the child's best interest, the court shall terminate the order. If extension is in the child's best interest, the court shall extend the order for six months.

(b) If it does not receive a timely request for a hearing, the court may extend the order for six months or terminate it without a hearing and shall journalize the order of extension or termination not later than fourteen days after receiving the request for extension or termination or after the date the court notifies the parties that it will extend or terminate the order. If the court does not extend or terminate the order, it shall schedule a hearing to be held no later than thirty days after the expiration of the applicable fourteen-day time period and give notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing to all parties and the child's guardian ad litem. At the hearing, the court shall determine whether extension or termination of the order is in the child's best interest. If termination is in the child's best interest, the court shall terminate the order. If extension is in the child's best interest, the court shall issue an order extending the order for protective supervision six months.

(2) If the court grants an extension of the order for protective supervision pursuant to division (H)(1) of this section, a party may, prior to termination of the extension, file with the court a request for an additional extension of six months or for termination of the order. The court and the parties shall comply with division (H)(1) of this section with respect to extending or terminating the order.

(3) If a court grants an extension pursuant to division (H)(2) of this section, the court shall terminate the order for protective supervision at the end of the extension.

(I) The court shall not issue a dispositional order pursuant to division (A) of this section that removes a child from the child's home unless the court complies with section 2151.419 of the Revised Code and includes in the dispositional order the findings of fact required by that section.

(J) If a motion or application for an order described in division (A)(6) of this section is made, the court shall not issue the order unless, prior to the issuance of the order, it provides to the person all of the following:

(1) Notice and a copy of the motion or application;

(2) The grounds for the motion or application;

(3) An opportunity to present evidence and witnesses at a hearing regarding the motion or application;

(4) An opportunity to be represented by counsel at the hearing.

(K) The jurisdiction of the court shall terminate one year after the date of the award or, if the court takes any further action in the matter subsequent to the award, the date of the latest further action subsequent to the award, if the court awards legal custody of a child to either of the following:

(1) A legal custodian who, at the time of the award of legal custody, resides in a county of this state other than the county in which the court is located;

(2) A legal custodian who resides in the county in which the court is located at the time of the award of legal custody, but moves to a different county of this state prior to one year after the date of the award or, if the court takes any further action in the matter subsequent to the award, one year after the date of the latest further action subsequent to the award.

The court in the county in which the legal custodian resides then shall have jurisdiction in the matter.

Last updated January 1, 2025 at 6:52 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,428 cases (591 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 46× “8 {¶ 64} R.C. 2151.353 expressly confers to the juvenile court the authority to “commit the child to the temporary custody of” a children-services or private child-placing agency.”
In re Cross, 96 Ohio St. 3d 328 (Ohio 2002). · cites it 17× “The court of appeals ruled that R.C. 2151.353 provides the juvenile court with continuing jurisdiction over any child for whom the court issues an order of disposition until the child turns eighteen.”
In re Cross, 2002 Ohio 4183 (Ohio 2002). · cites it 17× “The court of appeals ruled that R.C. 2151.353 provides the juvenile court with continuing jurisdiction over any child for whom the court issues an order 2 January Term, 2002 of disposition until the child turns eighteen.”
In re D.E., 2021 Ohio 524 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 13× “04(C), and ordering the children be committed temporarily to the custody of FCCS pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(A)(2). The entries noted temporary custody would continue until further notice of the court.”
In Re A.B., 852 N.E.2d 1187 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 12× “) {¶ 28} The father in this case contends that after the initial disposition under R.C. 2151.353, all further motions for disposition are governed by R.”
In re K.K., 2022 Ohio 3888 (Ohio 2022). · cites it 10× “The Challenge to the Dispositional Order Awarding Temporary Custody Is Barred by Res Judicata {¶ 58} “[A]n adjudication that a child is neglected or dependent, followed by a disposition awarding temporary custody to a public children services agency pursuant to R.C.…”
In re Young Child., 669 N.E.2d 1140 (Ohio 1996). · cites it 13× “At the risk of oversimplifying the issue before us, we believe that R.C. 2151.353 is dispositive. Accordingly, we hold that the passing of the sunset date pursuant to R.”
In Re of Ament, 755 N.E.2d 448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 13× “413 governs such motions for permanent custody and provides: “(A) A public children services agency or private child placing agency that, pursuant to an order of disposition under division (A)(2) of section 2151.353 of the Revised Code or under any version of section 2151.”
In re Baby Girl Baxter, 479 N.E.2d 257 (Ohio 1985). · cites it 9× “After a child has been adjudicated dependent in an action and a disposition is to be made pursuant to R.C. 2151.353, the court has four options.”
Hernandez Caballero v. Hernandez Caballero, 2023 Ohio 1006 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 20× “353(A) until: (1) the child reaches the age of 18, (2) the child reaches the age of 21 if the child is developmentally disabled, or physically impaired, or (3) the child is adopted and a final decree of adoption is issued.”
In re J.R.P., 2018 Ohio 3938 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 11× “The R.C. 2151.353 dispositional hearing in this matter occurred on March 17, 2014 and resulted in an award of temporary custody to Appellants on April 14, 2014.”
In re Murray, 556 N.E.2d 1169 (Ohio 1990). · cites it 5× “Among other things, R.C. 2151.353 was amended to include a new subdivision (F), which provides as follows: “Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was…”
Show all 1,428 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(2)(a) — 1 case
In re: L.S., 2018 Ohio 2978 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(4) — 2 cases
In Re Knotts, 671 N.E.2d 1357 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
In re J.F., 2020 Ohio 3085 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A) — 218 cases
State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016). “8 {¶ 64} R.C. 2151.353 expressly confers to the juvenile court the authority to “commit the child to the temporary custody of” a children-services or private child-placing agency.”
Hernandez Caballero v. Hernandez Caballero, 2023 Ohio 1006 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “353(A) until: (1) the child reaches the age of 18, (2) the child reaches the age of 21 if the child is developmentally disabled, or physically impaired, or (3) the child is adopted and a final decree of adoption is issued.”
In re C.B.C., 2016 Ohio 916 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re J.L.M., 2018 Ohio 2175 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re Cross, 96 Ohio St. 3d 328 (Ohio 2002). “The court of appeals ruled that R.C. 2151.353 provides the juvenile court with continuing jurisdiction over any child for whom the court issues an order of disposition until the child turns eighteen.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(1) — 29 cases
State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016). “8 {¶ 64} R.C. 2151.353 expressly confers to the juvenile court the authority to “commit the child to the temporary custody of” a children-services or private child-placing agency.”
In Re Willmann, 493 N.E.2d 1380 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986).
In Re of Ament, 755 N.E.2d 448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001). “413 governs such motions for permanent custody and provides: “(A) A public children services agency or private child placing agency that, pursuant to an order of disposition under division (A)(2) of section 2151.353 of the Revised Code or under any version of section 2151.”
In re J.L.M., 2018 Ohio 2175 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re V.B.-S., 2013 Ohio 5448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(1)(3) — 1 case
In re W.A.J., 2014 Ohio 604 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(2) — 129 cases
State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016). “8 {¶ 64} R.C. 2151.353 expressly confers to the juvenile court the authority to “commit the child to the temporary custody of” a children-services or private child-placing agency.”
In re H.F., 2008 Ohio 6810 (Ohio 2008).
In re K.K., 2022 Ohio 3888 (Ohio 2022). “The Challenge to the Dispositional Order Awarding Temporary Custody Is Barred by Res Judicata {¶ 58} “[A]n adjudication that a child is neglected or dependent, followed by a disposition awarding temporary custody to a public children services agency pursuant to R.C.…”
In re Murray, 556 N.E.2d 1169 (Ohio 1990). “Among other things, R.C. 2151.353 was amended to include a new subdivision (F), which provides as follows: “Any temporary custody order issued pursuant to division (A) of this section shall terminate one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was…”
In re C.F., 113 Ohio St. 3d 73 (Ohio 2007).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(2)(a) — 19 cases
In re E.C., 2019 Ohio 3791 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re S Child., 2018 Ohio 5010 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re G.G., 2022 Ohio 1654 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re L.R., 2019 Ohio 1152 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re A.P., 2022 Ohio 4295 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(2)(b) — 1 case
In re L.R., 2024 Ohio 5592 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(2)(c) — 1 case
In re R.M., 2025 Ohio 2909 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(2)(d) — 5 cases
In re J.R.P., 2018 Ohio 3938 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “The R.C. 2151.353 dispositional hearing in this matter occurred on March 17, 2014 and resulted in an award of temporary custody to Appellants on April 14, 2014.”
In re J.M., 2021 Ohio 1415 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re R.M., 2025 Ohio 2909 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re J.F., 2026 Ohio 212 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
In re E.H., 2026 Ohio 670 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(2)(f) — 1 case
In re S.L., 2019 Ohio 815 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(3) — 360 cases
In re G.M., 2011 Ohio 4090 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re J.R.P., 2018 Ohio 3938 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “The R.C. 2151.353 dispositional hearing in this matter occurred on March 17, 2014 and resulted in an award of temporary custody to Appellants on April 14, 2014.”
Pittman v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 640 F.3d 716 (6th Cir. 2011).
In re A.B., 2018 Ohio 4206 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re L.W., 2017 Ohio 657 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(3)(a) — 24 cases
In re C.B., 2011 Ohio 2899 (Ohio 2011).
In re C.S., 2022 Ohio 2451 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re G.M., 2011 Ohio 4090 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re C.D.Y., 2019 Ohio 4262 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re Y.F., 2024 Ohio 5605 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(3)(b) — 5 cases
In re K.A., 2017 Ohio 1 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
In re A.D., 2023 Ohio 2442 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Hernandez Caballero v. Hernandez Caballero, 2023 Ohio 1006 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “353(A) until: (1) the child reaches the age of 18, (2) the child reaches the age of 21 if the child is developmentally disabled, or physically impaired, or (3) the child is adopted and a final decree of adoption is issued.”
In re J.T.F., 2012 Ohio 2105 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Cornelius, 2011 Ohio 2564 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(3)(c) — 59 cases
Pittman v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 640 F.3d 716 (6th Cir. 2011).
In re J.B., 2016 Ohio 5513 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re G.M., 2011 Ohio 4090 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re K.D., 2017 Ohio 4161 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
In re V.P., 2020 Ohio 5626 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(3)(d) — 7 cases
In re A.B., 2017 Ohio 5776 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
In re K.F., 2023 Ohio 1438 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
In re A.V.O., 2012 Ohio 4092 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In re N.C., 2012 Ohio 1641 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In re R.D.J., 2013 Ohio 1999 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(4) — 188 cases
In re A.D., 2022 Ohio 736 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In Re Baby Girl Doe, 778 N.E.2d 1053 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
In re Baby Girl Baxter, 479 N.E.2d 257 (Ohio 1985). “After a child has been adjudicated dependent in an action and a disposition is to be made pursuant to R.C. 2151.353, the court has four options.”
In re E.B., 2017 Ohio 2672 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
In re B.S., 2018 Ohio 4645 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(5) — 49 cases
In Re A.B., 852 N.E.2d 1187 (Ohio 2006). “) {¶ 28} The father in this case contends that after the initial disposition under R.C. 2151.353, all further motions for disposition are governed by R.”
State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016). “8 {¶ 64} R.C. 2151.353 expressly confers to the juvenile court the authority to “commit the child to the temporary custody of” a children-services or private child-placing agency.”
In re K.P., 2022 Ohio 1347 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re S Child., 2018 Ohio 5010 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re J.R., 2018 Ohio 1474 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(5)(a) — 9 cases
Miller v. Greene Cnty. Child.'s Servs. Bd., 833 N.E.2d 805 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
In re D.N., 2011 Ohio 3395 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re T.B., 2025 Ohio 2075 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re T.R., 2025 Ohio 2531 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re D.N., 2011 Ohio 4627 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(5)(b) — 6 cases
Miller v. Greene Cnty. Child.'s Servs. Bd., 833 N.E.2d 805 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
In re D.N., 2011 Ohio 3395 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re D.N., 2011 Ohio 4627 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In the Matter Tanker, 754 N.E.2d 813 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
In Re A.S., 163 Ohio App. 3d 647 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(5)(c) — 5 cases
Miller v. Greene Cnty. Child.'s Servs. Bd., 833 N.E.2d 805 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
In re D.N., 2011 Ohio 3395 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re D.N., 2011 Ohio 4627 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re J.N., 2025 Ohio 936 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re W.J.S., 2019 Ohio 1258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(A)(6) — 2 cases
State v. Sturgeon, 742 N.E.2d 730 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000).
In re Contempt of Brewster, 2015 Ohio 4984 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(AX2) — 1 case
In re Smith Child., 3 Ohio App. Unrep. 336 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(B) — 15 cases
In Re B.C., 2014 Ohio 4558 (Ohio 2014).
In Re duncan/walker Child., 673 N.E.2d 217 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
In re I.H., 2020 Ohio 4853 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In Re Wilson, 486 N.E.2d 152 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984).
In Re Webb, 581 N.E.2d 570 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(B)(1) — 2 cases
In re L.W., 2020 Ohio 5439 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re C.W., 2020 Ohio 5438 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(B)(3) — 1 case
In re A.K., 2020 Ohio 4700 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(C) — 12 cases
In re L.C.C., 2018 Ohio 4617 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re M.Z., 2012 Ohio 3194 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In re Adoption of M.M.F., 2019 Ohio 448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In Re Lucas, 504 N.E.2d 472 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985).
In re K.L., 2017 Ohio 9003 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(D) — 4 cases
In re J.G., 2016 Ohio 896 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re T.J., 2012 Ohio 3399 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In Re Covin, 456 N.E.2d 520 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982).
In re I.S., 2022 Ohio 3923 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(E) — 9 cases
In re C.B.C., 2016 Ohio 916 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re S.H., 2020 Ohio 3499 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In Re of Ament, 755 N.E.2d 448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001). “413 governs such motions for permanent custody and provides: “(A) A public children services agency or private child placing agency that, pursuant to an order of disposition under division (A)(2) of section 2151.353 of the Revised Code or under any version of section 2151.”
In re E.C., 2022 Ohio 1223 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re M.G., 2023 Ohio 3423 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(E)(1) — 39 cases
In re Cross, 96 Ohio St. 3d 328 (Ohio 2002). “The court of appeals ruled that R.C. 2151.353 provides the juvenile court with continuing jurisdiction over any child for whom the court issues an order of disposition until the child turns eighteen.”
In re Cross, 2002 Ohio 4183 (Ohio 2002). “The court of appeals ruled that R.C. 2151.353 provides the juvenile court with continuing jurisdiction over any child for whom the court issues an order 2 January Term, 2002 of disposition until the child turns eighteen.”
In re Young Child., 669 N.E.2d 1140 (Ohio 1996). “At the risk of oversimplifying the issue before us, we believe that R.C. 2151.353 is dispositive. Accordingly, we hold that the passing of the sunset date pursuant to R.”
In Re of Ament, 755 N.E.2d 448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001). “413 governs such motions for permanent custody and provides: “(A) A public children services agency or private child placing agency that, pursuant to an order of disposition under division (A)(2) of section 2151.353 of the Revised Code or under any version of section 2151.”
In Re Omosun Child., 667 N.E.2d 431 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(E)(2) — 32 cases
In re L.M., 2011 Ohio 3285 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re A.S., 2013 Ohio 1975 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
In Re Hitchcock, 696 N.E.2d 1090 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
In the Matter of Nice, 751 N.E.2d 552 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
In re McBride, 850 N.E.2d 43 (Ohio 2006).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(F) — 53 cases
In re Young Child., 669 N.E.2d 1140 (Ohio 1996). “At the risk of oversimplifying the issue before us, we believe that R.C. 2151.353 is dispositive. Accordingly, we hold that the passing of the sunset date pursuant to R.”
State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016). “8 {¶ 64} R.C. 2151.353 expressly confers to the juvenile court the authority to “commit the child to the temporary custody of” a children-services or private child-placing agency.”
In the Matter of Nice, 751 N.E.2d 552 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).
Holloway v. Clermont Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 684 N.E.2d 1217 (Ohio 1997).
In re D.E., 2021 Ohio 524 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “04(C), and ordering the children be committed temporarily to the custody of FCCS pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(A)(2). The entries noted temporary custody would continue until further notice of the court.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(F)(1) — 53 cases
State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016). “8 {¶ 64} R.C. 2151.353 expressly confers to the juvenile court the authority to “commit the child to the temporary custody of” a children-services or private child-placing agency.”
Hernandez Caballero v. Hernandez Caballero, 2023 Ohio 1006 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “353(A) until: (1) the child reaches the age of 18, (2) the child reaches the age of 21 if the child is developmentally disabled, or physically impaired, or (3) the child is adopted and a final decree of adoption is issued.”
In re J.L.M., 2018 Ohio 2175 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re K.K., 2022 Ohio 3888 (Ohio 2022). “The Challenge to the Dispositional Order Awarding Temporary Custody Is Barred by Res Judicata {¶ 58} “[A]n adjudication that a child is neglected or dependent, followed by a disposition awarding temporary custody to a public children services agency pursuant to R.C.…”
In re I.E., 2020 Ohio 3477 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(F)(1)(A) — 2 cases
In re L.W., 2020 Ohio 5439 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re C.W., 2020 Ohio 5438 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(F)(2) — 28 cases
In re I.E., 2020 Ohio 3477 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re A.G., 2020 Ohio 2762 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re S.L., 2019 Ohio 815 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re G.H., 2016 Ohio 1188 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re Z.C., 2023 Ohio 963 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(G) — 74 cases
In re D.E., 2021 Ohio 524 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “04(C), and ordering the children be committed temporarily to the custody of FCCS pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(A)(2). The entries noted temporary custody would continue until further notice of the court.”
In Re Collier, 619 N.E.2d 503 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993).
In re A.J., 2019 Ohio 593 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
State ex rel. Allen Cty. Child. Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7382 (Ohio 2016). “8 {¶ 64} R.C. 2151.353 expressly confers to the juvenile court the authority to “commit the child to the temporary custody of” a children-services or private child-placing agency.”
In Re Carroll, 705 N.E.2d 402 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(G)(1) — 3 cases
In Re Carroll, 705 N.E.2d 402 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
In re M.R.L., 2011 Ohio 4997 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re M.O., 2014 Ohio 3060 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(G)(1)(b) — 1 case
In re L.H., 2012 Ohio 4062 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(G)(3) — 1 case
In Re Carroll, 705 N.E.2d 402 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(H) — 3 cases
In re J.C., 2021 Ohio 1133 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re J.C., 2021 Ohio 1453 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re S.L., 2025 Ohio 4608 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(H)(1) — 3 cases
In re A.C., 2022 Ohio 2761 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re O.F.A., 2025 Ohio 117 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re K.S.J., 2026 Ohio 2214 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(H)(2) — 1 case
In re O.F.A., 2025 Ohio 117 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(I) — 7 cases
In re L.G., 2022 Ohio 529 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re S.H., 2020 Ohio 3499 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re O.T., 2018 Ohio 1615 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
In re M.G., 2020 Ohio 3872 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re G.Y., 2022 Ohio 4560 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(J) — 3 cases
In Re Luman, 875 N.E.2d 647 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Cornelius, 2011 Ohio 2564 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In re Contempt of Brewster, 2015 Ohio 4984 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(J)(1) — 1 case
In Re Luman, 875 N.E.2d 647 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353(K) — 2 cases
In re K.K., 2022 Ohio 3888 (Ohio 2022). “The Challenge to the Dispositional Order Awarding Temporary Custody Is Barred by Res Judicata {¶ 58} “[A]n adjudication that a child is neglected or dependent, followed by a disposition awarding temporary custody to a public children services agency pursuant to R.C.…”
In re M.D., 2023 Ohio 3315 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.