Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83 (2026)

Juvenile sex offender registration at time of release from secure facility

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child shall issue as part of the dispositional order or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, shall issue at the time of the child's release from the secure facility an order that classifies the child a juvenile offender registrant and specifies that the child has a duty to comply with sections 2950.04, 2950.041, 2950.05, and 2950.06 of the Revised Code if all of the following apply:

(a) The act for which the child is or was adjudicated a delinquent child is a sexually oriented offense or a child-victim oriented offense that the child committed on or after January 1, 2002.

(b) The child was sixteen or seventeen years of age at the time of committing the offense.

(c) The court was not required to classify the child a juvenile offender registrant under section 2152.82 of the Revised Code or as both a juvenile offender registrant and a public registry-qualified juvenile offender registrant under section 2152.86 of the Revised Code.

(2) Prior to issuing the order required by division (A)(2) of this section, the judge shall conduct a hearing under section 2152.831 of the Revised Code, except as otherwise provided in that section, to determine whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender. When a judge issues an order under division (A)(1) of this section, the judge shall include in the order the determinations identified in division (B)(5) of section 2152.82 of the Revised Code.

(B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge's own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the time of the child's release from the secure facility a hearing for the purposes described in division (B)(2) of this section if all of the following apply:

(a) The act for which the child is adjudicated a delinquent child is a sexually oriented offense or a child-victim oriented offense that the child committed on or after January 1, 2002.

(b) The child was fourteen or fifteen years of age at the time of committing the offense.

(c) The court was not required to classify the child a juvenile offender registrant under section 2152.82 of the Revised Code or as both a juvenile offender registrant and a public registry-qualified juvenile offender registrant under section 2152.86 of the Revised Code.

(2) A judge shall conduct a hearing under division (B)(1) of this section to review the effectiveness of the disposition made of the child and of any treatment provided for the child placed in a secure setting and to determine whether the child should be classified a juvenile offender registrant. The judge may conduct the hearing on the judge's own initiative or based upon a recommendation of an officer or employee of the department of youth services, a probation officer, an employee of the court, or a prosecutor or law enforcement officer. If the judge conducts the hearing, upon completion of the hearing, the judge, in the judge's discretion and after consideration of the factors listed in division (E) of this section, shall do either of the following:

(a) Decline to issue an order that classifies the child a juvenile offender registrant and specifies that the child has a duty to comply with sections 2950.04, 2950.041, 2950.05, and 2950.06 of the Revised Code;

(b) Issue an order that classifies the child a juvenile offender registrant and specifies that the child has a duty to comply with sections 2950.04, 2950.041, 2950.05, and 2950.06 of the Revised Code and that states the determination that the judge makes at the hearing held pursuant to section 2152.831 of the Revised Code as to whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender.

(C)(1) Prior to issuing an order under division (B)(2)(b) of this section, the judge shall conduct a hearing under section 2152.831 of the Revised Code to determine whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender. The judge may hold the hearing at the same time as the hearing under division (B) of this section.

(2) If a judge issues an order under division (A) or (B) of this section and the court determines that the delinquent child to whom the order applies is a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender and the child is not a public registry-qualified juvenile offender registrant, the judge may impose a requirement subjecting the child to the victim and community notification provisions of sections 2950.10 and 2950.11 of the Revised Code. If the judge imposes a requirement subjecting the child to the victim and community notification provisions of sections 2950.10 and 2950.11 of the Revised Code, the judge shall include the requirement in the order.

(3) If a judge issues an order under division (A) or (B) of this section, the judge shall provide to the delinquent child and to the delinquent child's parent, guardian, or custodian a copy of the order and a notice containing the information described in divisions (A) and (B) of section 2950.03 of the Revised Code. The judge shall provide the notice at the time of the issuance of the order and shall comply with divisions (B) and (C) of that section regarding that notice and the provision of it.

The judge also shall include in the order a statement that, upon completion of the disposition of the delinquent child that was made for the sexually oriented offense or child-victim oriented offense upon which the order is based, a hearing will be conducted and the order is subject to modification or termination pursuant to section 2152.84 of the Revised Code.

(D) In making a decision under division (B) of this section as to whether a delinquent child should be classified a juvenile offender registrant, a judge shall consider all relevant factors, including, but not limited to, all of the following:

(1) The nature of the sexually oriented offense or the child-victim oriented offense committed by the child;

(2) Whether the child has shown any genuine remorse or compunction for the offense;

(3) The public interest and safety;

(4) The factors set forth in division (K) of section 2950.11 of the Revised Code, provided that references in the factors as set forth in that division to "the offender" shall be construed for purposes of this division to be references to "the delinquent child;"

(5) The factors set forth in divisions (B) and (C) of section 2929.12 of the Revised Code as those factors apply regarding the delinquent child, the offense, and the victim;

(6) The results of any treatment provided to the child and of any follow-up professional assessment of the child.

(E) An order issued under division (A) or (B) of this section and any determinations included in the order shall remain in effect for the period of time specified in section 2950.07 of the Revised Code, subject to a modification or termination of the order under section 2152.84 of the Revised Code, and section 2152.851 of the Revised Code applies regarding the order and the determinations. The child's attainment of eighteen or twenty-one years of age does not affect or terminate the order, and the order remains in effect for the period of time described in this division.

(F) If a court issues an order under division (A) or (B) of this section before January 1, 2008, not later than February 1, 2008, the court shall terminate the order and issue a new order that reclassifies the child as both a juvenile offender registrant and a public registry-qualified juvenile offender registrant pursuant to section 2152.86 of the Revised Code if the court imposed on the child a serious youthful offender dispositional sentence under section 2152.13 of the Revised Code and if the act that was the basis of the classification of the delinquent child as a juvenile offender registrant and is the basis of the serious youthful offender dispositional sentence is any of the following:

(1) Committing, attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or complicity in committing a violation of section 2907.02 of the Revised Code, division (B) of section 2907.05 of the Revised Code, or section 2907.03 of the Revised Code if the victim of the violation was less than twelve years of age;

(2) Committing, attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or complicity in committing a violation of section 2903.01, 2903.02, or 2905.01 of the Revised Code that was committed with a purpose to gratify the sexual needs or desires of the child.

(G) As used in this section, "secure facility" has the same meaning as in section 2950.01 of the Revised Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 130 cases (29 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case: In Re I.A., 2014 Ohio 3155 (Ohio 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re I.A., 2014 Ohio 3155 (Ohio 2014). · cites it 90× “{¶ 5} The court below recognized in its opinion that its interpretation of R.C. 2152.83(B) differed from that of the Fifth District Court of Appeals in In re B.”
In Re D.S., 2016 Ohio 1027 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 31× “Conducting a sex-offender-classification hearing under R.C. 2152.83 upon a delinquent child’s release from a secure facility does not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy.”
State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012). · cites it 51× “{¶ 25} The statute that controls the procedure for juvenile sex-offender classification is R.C. 2152.83. The dissent argues that the majority conflates Jean-Baptiste’s first proposition of law with his second.”
State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 2998 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 18× “{¶ 21} At the time of his offenses, Buttery was 14 years old and therefore subject to R.C. 2152.83(B), which allows a court to determine, after a juvenile has been found delinquent for committing a sexually oriented offense, whether to classify the juvenile as a…”
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5476 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 18× “The juvenile court conducts a hearing at the time of the juvenile’s disposition, see R.C. 2152.83, and at the time the juvenile completes the disposition, see R.”
In re D.R., 2014 Ohio 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 22× “R.C. 2152.83 provides, (B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge’s own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the…”
State v. Amos, 2017 Ohio 8448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 15× “84(A)(1) provides that when a juvenile court issues an order under R.C. 2152.83 classifying the juvenile as a juvenile-offender registrant, “upon completion of the disposition of that child made for the sexually oriented offense or the child-victim oriented offense on which the…”
In re D.R., 2021 Ohio 1797 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 10× “was 16 at the time of the offense, the juvenile court was required to classify him as a juvenile-offender registrant under R.C. 2152.83. On August 23, 2018, the juvenile court classified D.”
In re T.M., 2016 Ohio 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 21× “" The language utilized in R.C. 2152.83 therefore indicates that where classification of a juvenile is not done until after the juvenile's release from a secure facility, the classification is not part of the disposition itself.”
In re I.A., 2012 Ohio 4973 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 12× “In the second assignment of error, he contends that classifying him as a juvenile-offender registrant before his release from the secure facility violates R.C. 2152.83. I. Applying R.C. Chapter 2950 to Juveniles {¶ 3} John contends that applying R.”
In re P.C., 2019 Ohio 2603 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 16× “Instead, R.C. 2152.83 applied in this case, which applies to those not previously adjudicated a delinquent child for committing a sexually oriented or child-victim oriented offense.”
In re Forbess, 2010 Ohio 2826 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 7× “On appeal, Forbess argues that the juvenile court erred in admitting his custodial statements to police into evidence; that the juvenile court’s delinquency finding was unsupported by sufficient evidence and against the manifest weight of the evidence; that the juvenile court…”
Show all 130 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(A) — 46 cases
In re Raheem L., 2013 Ohio 2423 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012). “{¶ 25} The statute that controls the procedure for juvenile sex-offender classification is R.C. 2152.83. The dissent argues that the majority conflates Jean-Baptiste’s first proposition of law with his second.”
In re D.R., 2021 Ohio 1797 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “was 16 at the time of the offense, the juvenile court was required to classify him as a juvenile-offender registrant under R.C. 2152.83. On August 23, 2018, the juvenile court classified D.”
In re T.M., 2016 Ohio 8425 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re: D.D., 2015 Ohio 3999 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(A)(1) — 45 cases
State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012). “{¶ 25} The statute that controls the procedure for juvenile sex-offender classification is R.C. 2152.83. The dissent argues that the majority conflates Jean-Baptiste’s first proposition of law with his second.”
State v. Amos, 2017 Ohio 8448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “84(A)(1) provides that when a juvenile court issues an order under R.C. 2152.83 classifying the juvenile as a juvenile-offender registrant, “upon completion of the disposition of that child made for the sexually oriented offense or the child-victim oriented offense on which the…”
In re D.R., 2021 Ohio 1797 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “was 16 at the time of the offense, the juvenile court was required to classify him as a juvenile-offender registrant under R.C. 2152.83. On August 23, 2018, the juvenile court classified D.”
In re D.R., 2022 Ohio 4493 (Ohio 2022).
State v. Eads, 2011 Ohio 6307 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(A)(1)(a) — 3 cases
In re P.C., 2019 Ohio 2603 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Instead, R.C. 2152.83 applied in this case, which applies to those not previously adjudicated a delinquent child for committing a sexually oriented or child-victim oriented offense.”
In re D.F., 2021 Ohio 3109 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re C.R., 2021 Ohio 2456 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(A)(1)(a)(b) — 1 case
In re T.U., 2016 Ohio 7104 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(A)(1)(b) — 3 cases
In re I.A., 2012 Ohio 4973 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “In the second assignment of error, he contends that classifying him as a juvenile-offender registrant before his release from the secure facility violates R.C. 2152.83. I. Applying R.C. Chapter 2950 to Juveniles {¶ 3} John contends that applying R.”
In re J.M., 2010 Ohio 2700 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
In re C.R., 2021 Ohio 2456 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(A)(1)(c) — 4 cases
In re J.W., 2020 Ohio 4065 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re P.C., 2019 Ohio 2603 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “Instead, R.C. 2152.83 applied in this case, which applies to those not previously adjudicated a delinquent child for committing a sexually oriented or child-victim oriented offense.”
In re D.F., 2021 Ohio 3109 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re C.P., 2022 Ohio 4087 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(A)(2) — 19 cases
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5476 (Ohio 2020). “The juvenile court conducts a hearing at the time of the juvenile’s disposition, see R.C. 2152.83, and at the time the juvenile completes the disposition, see R.”
In re T.M., 2016 Ohio 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “" The language utilized in R.C. 2152.83 therefore indicates that where classification of a juvenile is not done until after the juvenile's release from a secure facility, the classification is not part of the disposition itself.”
In re: D.D., 2015 Ohio 3999 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
In re P.C., 2020 Ohio 6791 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Powers, 2022 Ohio 2233 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B) — 41 cases
In Re D.S., 2016 Ohio 1027 (Ohio 2016). “Conducting a sex-offender-classification hearing under R.C. 2152.83 upon a delinquent child’s release from a secure facility does not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy.”
State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 2998 (Ohio 2020). “{¶ 21} At the time of his offenses, Buttery was 14 years old and therefore subject to R.C. 2152.83(B), which allows a court to determine, after a juvenile has been found delinquent for committing a sexually oriented offense, whether to classify the juvenile as a…”
In Re I.A., 2014 Ohio 3155 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 5} The court below recognized in its opinion that its interpretation of R.C. 2152.83(B) differed from that of the Fifth District Court of Appeals in In re B.”
In re D.R., 2014 Ohio 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “R.C. 2152.83 provides, (B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge’s own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the…”
In re T.M., 2016 Ohio 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “" The language utilized in R.C. 2152.83 therefore indicates that where classification of a juvenile is not done until after the juvenile's release from a secure facility, the classification is not part of the disposition itself.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B)(1) — 42 cases
In Re I.A., 2014 Ohio 3155 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 5} The court below recognized in its opinion that its interpretation of R.C. 2152.83(B) differed from that of the Fifth District Court of Appeals in In re B.”
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5476 (Ohio 2020). “The juvenile court conducts a hearing at the time of the juvenile’s disposition, see R.C. 2152.83, and at the time the juvenile completes the disposition, see R.”
In re D.R., 2014 Ohio 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “R.C. 2152.83 provides, (B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge’s own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the…”
In re N.Z., 2014 Ohio 157 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
In re I.A., 2012 Ohio 4973 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “In the second assignment of error, he contends that classifying him as a juvenile-offender registrant before his release from the secure facility violates R.C. 2152.83. I. Applying R.C. Chapter 2950 to Juveniles {¶ 3} John contends that applying R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B)(1)(a) — 2 cases
In re A.J., 2022 Ohio 2669 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re L.O., 2014 Ohio 2125 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B)(1)(b) — 2 cases
In re C.R., 2021 Ohio 2456 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re A.J., 2022 Ohio 2669 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B)(1)(c) — 1 case
In re A.J., 2022 Ohio 2669 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B)(2) — 26 cases
In Re I.A., 2014 Ohio 3155 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 5} The court below recognized in its opinion that its interpretation of R.C. 2152.83(B) differed from that of the Fifth District Court of Appeals in In re B.”
In Re D.S., 2016 Ohio 1027 (Ohio 2016). “Conducting a sex-offender-classification hearing under R.C. 2152.83 upon a delinquent child’s release from a secure facility does not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy.”
State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 2998 (Ohio 2020). “{¶ 21} At the time of his offenses, Buttery was 14 years old and therefore subject to R.C. 2152.83(B), which allows a court to determine, after a juvenile has been found delinquent for committing a sexually oriented offense, whether to classify the juvenile as a…”
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5476 (Ohio 2020). “The juvenile court conducts a hearing at the time of the juvenile’s disposition, see R.C. 2152.83, and at the time the juvenile completes the disposition, see R.”
In re T.M., 2016 Ohio 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “" The language utilized in R.C. 2152.83 therefore indicates that where classification of a juvenile is not done until after the juvenile's release from a secure facility, the classification is not part of the disposition itself.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B)(2)(a) — 1 case
In re T.N., 2016 Ohio 7258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B)(2)(b) — 7 cases
State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 2998 (Ohio 2020). “{¶ 21} At the time of his offenses, Buttery was 14 years old and therefore subject to R.C. 2152.83(B), which allows a court to determine, after a juvenile has been found delinquent for committing a sexually oriented offense, whether to classify the juvenile as a…”
In re D.R., 2014 Ohio 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “R.C. 2152.83 provides, (B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge’s own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the…”
In re K.D.H., 2013 Ohio 2636 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
In re M.B., 2016 Ohio 4780 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re Q.J., 2012 Ohio 4210 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(B)(3) — 1 case
In re T.R., 2020 Ohio 4445 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(C) — 6 cases
In Re D.S., 2016 Ohio 1027 (Ohio 2016). “Conducting a sex-offender-classification hearing under R.C. 2152.83 upon a delinquent child’s release from a secure facility does not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy.”
In re K.T., 2019 Ohio 4258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re R.M., 2014 Ohio 1200 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
In re M.W., 2019 Ohio 4564 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re L.N., 2018 Ohio 3982 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(C)(1) — 4 cases
In re T.M., 2016 Ohio 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “" The language utilized in R.C. 2152.83 therefore indicates that where classification of a juvenile is not done until after the juvenile's release from a secure facility, the classification is not part of the disposition itself.”
In re D.R., 2014 Ohio 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “R.C. 2152.83 provides, (B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge’s own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the…”
In re T.N., 2016 Ohio 7258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
In re A.J., 2022 Ohio 2669 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(C)(2) — 6 cases
In re D.R., 2014 Ohio 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “R.C. 2152.83 provides, (B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge’s own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the…”
In re R.M., 2014 Ohio 1200 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
In re Q.J., 2012 Ohio 4210 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In re B.L., 2011 Ohio 3412 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
In Re P.M., 912 N.E.2d 130 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(C)(3) — 4 cases
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5476 (Ohio 2020). “The juvenile court conducts a hearing at the time of the juvenile’s disposition, see R.C. 2152.83, and at the time the juvenile completes the disposition, see R.”
In re N.D., 2021 Ohio 4506 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re N.D., 2021 Ohio 4512 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
In re M.B.E., 2025 Ohio 4391 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(D) — 39 cases
In Re D.S., 2016 Ohio 1027 (Ohio 2016). “Conducting a sex-offender-classification hearing under R.C. 2152.83 upon a delinquent child’s release from a secure facility does not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy.”
State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 2998 (Ohio 2020). “{¶ 21} At the time of his offenses, Buttery was 14 years old and therefore subject to R.C. 2152.83(B), which allows a court to determine, after a juvenile has been found delinquent for committing a sexually oriented offense, whether to classify the juvenile as a…”
In re C.R., 2014 Ohio 1936 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
In Re I.A., 2014 Ohio 3155 (Ohio 2014). “{¶ 5} The court below recognized in its opinion that its interpretation of R.C. 2152.83(B) differed from that of the Fifth District Court of Appeals in In re B.”
In re K.T., 2019 Ohio 4258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(D)(1) — 12 cases
In re N.Z., 2014 Ohio 157 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
In re D.R., 2014 Ohio 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “R.C. 2152.83 provides, (B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge’s own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the…”
In re T.M., 2016 Ohio 162 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “" The language utilized in R.C. 2152.83 therefore indicates that where classification of a juvenile is not done until after the juvenile's release from a secure facility, the classification is not part of the disposition itself.”
In re K.D.H., 2013 Ohio 2636 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
In re D.J., 2021 Ohio 278 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(D)(2) — 8 cases
In re K.T., 2019 Ohio 4258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re K.D.H., 2013 Ohio 2636 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
In re V.W., 2025 Ohio 2773 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re Q.J., 2012 Ohio 4210 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In re J.C., 2023 Ohio 1501 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(D)(3) — 3 cases
In re Q.J., 2012 Ohio 4210 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In re J.C., 2023 Ohio 1501 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
In re A.B., 2026 Ohio 2170 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(D)(4) — 3 cases
In re P.C., 2020 Ohio 6791 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
In re J.C., 2023 Ohio 1501 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
In re A.J., 2022 Ohio 2669 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(D)(5) — 2 cases
In re A.J., 2022 Ohio 2669 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
In re A.B., 2026 Ohio 2170 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(D)(6) — 7 cases
In re V.W., 2025 Ohio 2773 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
In re K.T., 2019 Ohio 4258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
In re Q.J., 2012 Ohio 4210 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
In re J.C., 2023 Ohio 1501 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
In re C.L.M., 2012 Ohio 5175 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(E) — 18 cases
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5476 (Ohio 2020). “The juvenile court conducts a hearing at the time of the juvenile’s disposition, see R.C. 2152.83, and at the time the juvenile completes the disposition, see R.”
State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. Kirsch, 2012 Ohio 5697 (Ohio 2012). “{¶ 25} The statute that controls the procedure for juvenile sex-offender classification is R.C. 2152.83. The dissent argues that the majority conflates Jean-Baptiste’s first proposition of law with his second.”
In re D.R., 2014 Ohio 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “R.C. 2152.83 provides, (B)(1) The court that adjudicates a child a delinquent child, on the judge’s own motion, may conduct at the time of disposition of the child or, if the court commits the child for the delinquent act to the custody of a secure facility, may conduct at the…”
In re N.Z., 2014 Ohio 157 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Amos, 2017 Ohio 8448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “84(A)(1) provides that when a juvenile court issues an order under R.C. 2152.83 classifying the juvenile as a juvenile-offender registrant, “upon completion of the disposition of that child made for the sexually oriented offense or the child-victim oriented offense on which the…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(F) — 2 cases
State v. Amos, 2017 Ohio 8448 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “84(A)(1) provides that when a juvenile court issues an order under R.C. 2152.83 classifying the juvenile as a juvenile-offender registrant, “upon completion of the disposition of that child made for the sexually oriented offense or the child-victim oriented offense on which the…”
State v. Schulze, 2016 Ohio 470 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.83(G) — 1 case
In re C.D., 2018 Ohio 4509 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.