An action to recover the title to or possession of real property shall be brought within twenty-one years after the cause of action accrued, but if a person entitled to bring the action is, at the time the cause of action accrues, within the age of minority or of unsound mind, the person, after the expiration of twenty-one years from the time the cause of action accrues, may bring the action within ten years after the disability is removed.
Browne v. Artex Oil Co. (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 4809 (Ohio 2019). · cites it 19ד] The limitations period set forth in R.C. 2305.04 applies to a claim for declaratory judgment that an oil and gas lease has terminated by its terms and by operation of law due to lack of production.”
Elliot v. Durrani, 2022 Ohio 4190 (Ohio 2022). · cites it 4דHe quotes from Wilson in support of his argument that any exceptions to the medical-claim statute of repose are in the statute of repose: “ ‘Because the statute of repose now expressly incorporates only one statutory exception, other statutes that extend the time in which to…”
Elliot v. Durrani, 2021 Ohio 3055 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 4ד15 is titled, “Tolling during defendant’s absence, concealment or imprisonment,” and states in pertinent part: (A) When a cause of action accrues against a person, if the person is out of the state, has absconded, or conceals self, the period of limitation for the commencement…”
State ex rel. A.A.A. v. City of Columbus, 478 N.E.2d 773 (Ohio 1985). · cites it 6דAppellant contends that appellee’s action constituted a “taking” of private property by a government entity which must be compensated pursuant to Section 19, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. 1 Appellant also sub *152 mits that a municipality has no authority to acquire title…”
Schlabach v. Kondik, 2017 Ohio 8016 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3ד" He posits that this constitutes an interest in land and thus the 21 year statute of limitation in R.C. 2305.04 controls. Neither party disputes that the execution of the deeds on July 30, 2000 (the Sinclairs) and November 8, 2000 (the Mackos), started running the limitations…”
Huron v. McCune, 2023 Ohio 575 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 14דIn her first assignment of error, McCune argues that the city should not have prevailed on its adverse possession claim because (1) the city filed its action outside the 21-year statute of limitations provided in R.C. 2305.04; (2) the city’s use of Water Lot 1 was not…”
Bank of New York Mellon v. Walker, 2017 Ohio 535 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2דThis is because, as a result of a recent Ohio Supreme Court decision, the mortgage is governed by a different statute of limitations.”
Karras v. Karras, 2017 Ohio 5829 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3דCatherine claims that, pursuant to R.C. 2305.04, the statute of limitations to recover title to or possession of property is 21 years, and if she had failed to perform some act that was required under the deed or divorce decree, the time for forcing her to do so had passed.”
Watkins v. Dep't of Youth Servs., 39 N.E.3d 1207 (Ohio 2015). · cites it 4ד03(A) states that “unless a different limitation is prescribed by statute, a civil action may be *481 commenced only within the period prescribed in sections 2305.04 to 2305.22 of the Revised Code.”
Hatfield v. Wray, 748 N.E.2d 612 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 7דBy decision filed December 16, 1999, the trial court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment, finding that appellant lacked standing to bring the action and that, even assuming that appellant had standing, the action was barred by the twenty-one-year limitations period…”
Potter v. Cottrill, 2012 Ohio 2417 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4דPotter responds that his claims constitute actions to recover the title to real property and are subject to R.C. 2305.04’s twenty-one year statute of limitations.”
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. O'Malley, 2019 Ohio 5340 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2דBank argues that (1) the foreclosure action is governed by either R.C. 2305.04, which provides a 21-year statute of limitations or R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.