(A) Any person called as a juror for the trial of any cause shall be examined under oath or upon affirmation as to the person's qualifications. A person is qualified to serve as a juror if the person is eighteen years of age or older, is a resident of the county, and is an elector or would be an elector if the person were registered to vote, regardless of whether the person actually is registered to vote.
(B) The following are good causes for challenge to any person called as a juror:
(1) That the person has been convicted of a crime that by law renders the person disqualified to serve on a jury;
(2) That the person has an interest in the cause;
(3) That the person has an action pending between the person and either party;
(4) That the person formerly was a juror in the same cause;
(5) That the person is the employer, the employee, or the spouse, parent, son, or daughter of the employer or employee, counselor, agent, steward, or attorney of either party;
(6) That the person is subpoenaed in good faith as a witness in the cause;
(7) That the person is akin by consanguinity or affinity within the fourth degree to either party or to the attorney of either party;
(8) That the person or the person's spouse, parent, son, or daughter is a party to another action then pending in any court in which an attorney in the cause then on trial is an attorney, either for or against any such party to another such action;
(9) That the person discloses by the person's answers that the person cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to the person by the court.
(C) Each challenge listed in division (B) of this section shall be considered as a principal challenge, and its validity tried by the court.
(D) In addition to the causes listed in division (B) of this section, any petit juror may be challenged on suspicion of prejudice against or partiality for either party, or for want of a competent knowledge of the English language, or other cause that may render the juror at the time an unsuitable juror. The validity of the challenge shall be determined by the court and be sustained if the court has any doubt as to the juror's being entirely unbiased.
Cordova v. Emergency Prof'l Servs., Inc., 2017-Ohio-7245, 96 N.E.3d 906. · cites it 24ד" {¶ 26} R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth nine "good causes for challenge to any person called as a juror.”
State v. Maxwell, 2014-Ohio-1019, 9 N.E.3d 930. · cites it 4ד42(J) (now R.C. 2313.17(B)(9)) stated that good cause exists for the removal of a prospective juror when “he discloses by his 28 January Term, 2014 answers that he cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to him by the court.”
Hunt v. City of E. Cleveland, 2019-Ohio-1115, 128 N.E.3d 265. · cites it 11ד{¶33} R.C. 2313.17 governs challenges of jurors for cause.”
State v. Carter, 2017-Ohio-7501, 96 N.E.3d 1046. · cites it 4דFor instance, there is good cause for challenge if "the person discloses by the person's answers that the person cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to the person by the court.”
State v. Lloyd, 2021-Ohio-1808. · cites it 4ד7’s answers to the state’s questions gave reasonable cause for concern that she could not be fair and impartial, supporting a valid challenge under R.C. 2313.17. Moreover, and without addressing the implications of a “principal challenge” as defined under R.”
Jenkins v. Grawe, 2019-Ohio-2013. · cites it 9ד) {¶ 32} The statute governing challenges to persons called as jurors, R.C. 2313.17, provides a mechanism for parties to challenge potential jurors for cause.”
Garry v. Borger, 2023-Ohio-905. · cites it 3ד17(B)(9) provides that a prospective juror may be excused for cause when that person “discloses by the person’s answers that the person cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to the person by the court.”
State v. Palmer, 2022-Ohio-2643. · cites it 5דFurther, R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth challenges for cause to excuse a potential juror, and it identifies the following as challenges: “that the person has an interest in the cause;” (R.”
Est. of Price v. Kidney Care Specialist, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-3122, 249 N.E.3d 1233. · cites it 17דR.C. 2313.17 (B)(9) states that good cause exists to challenge a juror when it is “disclose[d] by the [juror’s] answers that the [juror] cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given by .”
State v. Quinn, 2017-Ohio-7000, 95 N.E.3d 664. · cites it 4דUnder R.C. 2313.17(B)(9) and (D), and R.C. 2945.”
Long v. Harding, 2021-Ohio-4240. · cites it 4ד" {¶ 15} R.C. 2313.17 governs challenges of jurors for cause.”
Curley v. Wilcox, 2023-Ohio-3507, 225 N.E.3d 1241. · cites it 14דSaid grounds for jurors in a civil trial are codified in R.C. 2313.17. {¶ 15} The Curleys rely on R.”
State v. Palmer, 2022-Ohio-2643. “Further, R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth challenges for cause to excuse a potential juror, and it identifies the following as challenges: “that the person has an interest in the cause;” (R.”
Hunt v. City of E. Cleveland, 2019-Ohio-1115, 128 N.E.3d 265. “{¶33} R.C. 2313.17 governs challenges of jurors for cause.”
Jenkins v. Grawe, 2019-Ohio-2013. “) {¶ 32} The statute governing challenges to persons called as jurors, R.C. 2313.17, provides a mechanism for parties to challenge potential jurors for cause.”
Cordova v. Emergency Prof'l Servs., Inc., 2017-Ohio-7245, 96 N.E.3d 906. “" {¶ 26} R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth nine "good causes for challenge to any person called as a juror.”
Est. of Price v. Kidney Care Specialist, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-3122, 249 N.E.3d 1233. “R.C. 2313.17 (B)(9) states that good cause exists to challenge a juror when it is “disclose[d] by the [juror’s] answers that the [juror] cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given by .”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.17(B)(1): 5 cases
State v. Carter, 2017-Ohio-7501, 96 N.E.3d 1046. “For instance, there is good cause for challenge if "the person discloses by the person's answers that the person cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to the person by the court.”
Curley v. Wilcox, 2023-Ohio-3507, 225 N.E.3d 1241. “Said grounds for jurors in a civil trial are codified in R.C. 2313.17. {¶ 15} The Curleys rely on R.”
Curley v. Wilcox, 2023-Ohio-3507, 225 N.E.3d 1241. “Said grounds for jurors in a civil trial are codified in R.C. 2313.17. {¶ 15} The Curleys rely on R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.17(B)(3): 1 case
State v. Palmer, 2022-Ohio-2643. “Further, R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth challenges for cause to excuse a potential juror, and it identifies the following as challenges: “that the person has an interest in the cause;” (R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.17(B)(4): 1 case
State v. Palmer, 2022-Ohio-2643. “Further, R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth challenges for cause to excuse a potential juror, and it identifies the following as challenges: “that the person has an interest in the cause;” (R.”
Cordova v. Emergency Prof'l Servs., Inc., 2017-Ohio-7245, 96 N.E.3d 906. “" {¶ 26} R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth nine "good causes for challenge to any person called as a juror.”
State v. Maxwell, 2014-Ohio-1019, 9 N.E.3d 930. “42(J) (now R.C. 2313.17(B)(9)) stated that good cause exists for the removal of a prospective juror when “he discloses by his 28 January Term, 2014 answers that he cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to him by the court.”
State v. Carter, 2017-Ohio-7501, 96 N.E.3d 1046. “For instance, there is good cause for challenge if "the person discloses by the person's answers that the person cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to the person by the court.”
Hunt v. City of E. Cleveland, 2019-Ohio-1115, 128 N.E.3d 265. “{¶33} R.C. 2313.17 governs challenges of jurors for cause.”
State v. Lloyd, 2021-Ohio-1808. “7’s answers to the state’s questions gave reasonable cause for concern that she could not be fair and impartial, supporting a valid challenge under R.C. 2313.17. Moreover, and without addressing the implications of a “principal challenge” as defined under R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.17(C): 9 cases
Hunt v. City of E. Cleveland, 2019-Ohio-1115, 128 N.E.3d 265. “{¶33} R.C. 2313.17 governs challenges of jurors for cause.”
Cordova v. Emergency Prof'l Servs., Inc., 2017-Ohio-7245, 96 N.E.3d 906. “" {¶ 26} R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth nine "good causes for challenge to any person called as a juror.”
Jenkins v. Grawe, 2019-Ohio-2013. “) {¶ 32} The statute governing challenges to persons called as jurors, R.C. 2313.17, provides a mechanism for parties to challenge potential jurors for cause.”
Curley v. Wilcox, 2023-Ohio-3507, 225 N.E.3d 1241. “Said grounds for jurors in a civil trial are codified in R.C. 2313.17. {¶ 15} The Curleys rely on R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2313.17(D): 19 cases
State v. Maxwell, 2014-Ohio-1019, 9 N.E.3d 930. “42(J) (now R.C. 2313.17(B)(9)) stated that good cause exists for the removal of a prospective juror when “he discloses by his 28 January Term, 2014 answers that he cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to him by the court.”
Cordova v. Emergency Prof'l Servs., Inc., 2017-Ohio-7245, 96 N.E.3d 906. “" {¶ 26} R.C. 2313.17(B) sets forth nine "good causes for challenge to any person called as a juror.”
State v. Carter, 2017-Ohio-7501, 96 N.E.3d 1046. “For instance, there is good cause for challenge if "the person discloses by the person's answers that the person cannot be a fair and impartial juror or will not follow the law as given to the person by the court.”
Jenkins v. Grawe, 2019-Ohio-2013. “) {¶ 32} The statute governing challenges to persons called as jurors, R.C. 2313.17, provides a mechanism for parties to challenge potential jurors for cause.”
State v. Quinn, 2017-Ohio-7000, 95 N.E.3d 664. “Under R.C. 2313.17(B)(9) and (D), and R.C. 2945.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.