When it is necessary to ascertain the amount or value of personal property exempt under sections 2329.63 to 2329.71 of the Revised Code, it shall be estimated and appraised by two disinterested householders of the county, who shall be selected by the officer holding the execution and sworn by the officer to impartially make the appraisement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1992–2024 · leading case: In re Davis, 539 B.R. 334 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2015).
In re Davis, 539 B.R. 334 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2015). · cites it 2ד66(C) provided that a person’s “interest” in property was determined as follows: (1) In bankruptcy proceedings, as of the date a petition is filed with the bankruptcy court commencing a case under Title 11 of the United States Code; *342 (2) In all cases other than bankruptcy…”
First Natl. Bank of Pennsylvania v. Jones, 2014 Ohio 746 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 3ד{¶18} As is stated in the statute, the property owner’s “‘interest’ shall be determined,” in “cases other than bankruptcy proceedings, as of the date of an appraisal, if necessary under section 2329.”
UBS Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Lacava, 2017 Ohio 7916 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “Lacava contends that the trial court erred by not ordering an appraisal pursuant to R.C. 2329.68 in order to ascertain the amount or value of his inventoried personal property.”
Scalise v. Cushman, 2014 Ohio 4781 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4ד12, 2001) (“A homestead exemption is not effective until there is an involuntary execution that subjects the property to judicial sale.”
4030 W. Broad, Inc. v. Neal, 2021 Ohio 3685 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2ד66(D)(2), "the interest shall be determined as of the date of any necessary appraisal conducted under R.C. 2329.68 or the issuance of a writ of execution.”
Hutchinson v. Cox, 784 F. Supp. 1339 (S.D. Ohio 1992). “The statutes provide for ap-praisement of the property after seizure, § 2329.68, so that a sheriff or bailiff may seize the property and the debtor may be deprived of the use of exempt property for some time before its is determined to be exempt.”
Dailey v. Miller, 2024 Ohio 1340 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3דIt expressly references R.C. 2329.68, which, in turn, provides, “When it is necessary to ascertain the amount or value of personal property exempt under sections 2329.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.