An appellant is not required to give a supersedeas bond in connection with any of the following:
(A) An appeal by any of the following:
(1) An executor, administrator, guardian, receiver, trustee, or trustee in bankruptcy who is acting in that person's trust capacity and who has given bond in this state, with surety according to law;
(2) The state or any political subdivision of the state;
(3) Any public officer of the state or of any of its political subdivisions who is suing or is sued solely in the public officer's representative capacity as that officer.
(B) An administrative-related appeal of a final order that is not for the payment of money.
U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Lewis, 2019-Ohio-3014. · cites it 2ד09 does not apply based on R.C. 2505.12(B), which provides that an "appellant is not required to give a supersedeas bond in connection with * * * [a]n administrative-related appeal of a final order that is not for the payment of money.”
Mahoney v. City of Berea, 514 N.E.2d 889 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1986). · cites it 3ד06 states as follows: “Except as provided in section 2505.12 of the Revised Code, no appeal shall be effective as an appeal upon questions of law and fact until the order, judgment, or decree appealed from is superseded by a bond in the amount and with the conditions provided in…”
Sharon Realty Co. v. Westlake, 182 N.E.2d 876 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1961). · cites it 12ד06 of the Revised Code, which reads as follows: “Except as provided in Section 2505.12 of the Revised Code, no appeal shall be effective as an appeal upon questions of law and fact until the order, judgment, or decree appealed from is superseded by a bond in the amount and with…”
Fox v. City of Lakewood, 616 N.E.2d 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1992). · cites it 3ד01, which does not require a bond, the issue of requiring a bond pursuant to R.C. 2505.12 is moot. On the issue of praecipe, we note that the trial court granted appellants’ motion to amend their appeal and file the required praecipe, thereby rendering the issue moot.”
Markowitz & Co. v. Toledo Metro. Hous. Auth., 74 F.R.D. 550 (N.D. Ohio 1977). · cites it 2דOhio Rev.Code § 2505.12. Admittedly TMHA is a political subdivision for the purpose of exempting it from taxation.”
Ballado v. City of Cleveland Heights, 602 N.E.2d 394 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1991). · cites it 2דThat section reads: “Except as provided in section 2505.12 of the Revised Code, no administrative-related appeal shall be effective as an appeal upon questions of law and fact until the final order appealed is superseded by a bond in the amount and with the conditions provided…”
Wolf v. City of Columbus, 129 N.E.2d 309 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1954). · cites it 2דIt is urged by the defendants that the city of Columbus, one of the defendants, is a political subdivision, that the other two defendants are officers of a political subdivision, and that an appeal bond may not be required, citing Section 2505.12, Revised Code, which provides…”
Salida Invest. Grp. v. Lake Cty. Util. Dept., 2015-Ohio-5066. · cites it 2ד06, as this provision governs the posting of a supersedeas bond in conjunction with the notice of appeal: {¶21} “Except as provided in section 2505.12 of the Revised Code, no administrative-related appeal shall be effective as an appeal under questions of law and fact until the…”
Judd v. Queen City Metro, 508 N.E.2d 1034 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1986). “Under that language, did Transit Casualty Company have the right to settle any claim and obligate you to pay the underlying $100,000? “A.”
Liberal Mkt., Inc. v. Main-Nottingham Inv. Corp., 127 N.E.2d 50 (Ohio Ct. App. 1954). · cites it 4ד06, Revised Code, provides as follows: “Except as provided in Section 2505.12 of the Revised Code, no appeal shall be effective as an appeal upon questions of law and fact until the order, judgment, or decree appealed from is superseded by a bond in the amount and with the…”
Houghtaling v. City of Medina Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 731 N.E.2d 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1999). · cites it 2ד06: ■ “Except as provided in section 2505.12 of the Revised Code, no administrative-related- appeal shall be effective as an appeal upon questions of law and fact until the final order appealed is superseded by a bond in the amount and with the conditions provided in sections…”
U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Lewis, 2019-Ohio-3014. “09 does not apply based on R.C. 2505.12(B), which provides that an "appellant is not required to give a supersedeas bond in connection with * * * [a]n administrative-related appeal of a final order that is not for the payment of money.”
Judd v. Queen City Metro, 508 N.E.2d 1034 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1986). “Under that language, did Transit Casualty Company have the right to settle any claim and obligate you to pay the underlying $100,000? “A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.