Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2711.09 (2026)

Application for order confirming award

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

At any time within one year after an award in an arbitration proceeding is made, any party to the arbitration may apply to the court of common pleas for an order confirming the award. Thereupon the court shall grant such an order and enter judgment thereon, unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 2711.10 and 2711.11 of the Revised Code. Notice in writing of the application shall be served upon the adverse party or his attorney five days before the hearing thereof.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 137 cases (33 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case: BST Ohio Corp. v. Wolgang (Slip Opinion), 2021 Ohio 1785 (Ohio 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
BST Ohio Corp. v. Wolgang (Slip Opinion), 2021 Ohio 1785 (Ohio 2021). · cites it 34× “] Neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award—The three- month period set forth in R.”
Woods v. Farmers Ins. of Columbus, Inc., 666 N.E.2d 283 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 26× “03(C) is available upon a judgment entered on an arbitration award pursuant to R.C. 2711.09. We hold that it is. On November 8, 1992, Deborah C.”
State ex rel. Shimko v. McMonagle, 751 N.E.2d 472 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 9× “On March 10, 2000, Lobe filed a motion in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas for an order confirming the arbitration award pursuant to R.C. 2711.09. On the same date, the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court granted Lobe’s motion and entered judgment in favor of Lobe and…”
Russo v. Chittick, 548 N.E.2d 314 (Ohio Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 11× “Appellant’s basic contentions are as follows: (1) the one year provided by R.C. 2711.09 to confirm the award acts as a statute of limitations period prohibiting the court of common pleas from confirming the award if the motion to confirm is made beyond said period; and (2) the…”
Warren Educ. Ass'n v. Warren City Bd. of Educ., 480 N.E.2d 456 (Ohio 1985). · cites it 5× “The primary issue posited by appellant is whether the trial court’s order was, in effect, a modification, as opposed to a confirmation, of the arbitrator’s award, rendering the order void ab initio inasmuch as this action was commenced pursuant to R.C. 2711.09. For the reasons…”
Hughes v. Hughes, 2020 Ohio 5026 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 8× “11, the court could rule on appellee's application to confirm pursuant to R.C. 2711.09. After stating it was granting appellee's application to confirm, the trial court added: "This Court reaches the same conclusion as the Marion County Court and incorporates Judge Finnegan's…”
Citibank South Dakota, N.A. v. Wood, 169 Ohio App. 3d 269 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “Thereupon the court shall grant such an order and enter judgment thereon, unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 2711.”
Norman v. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc., 2020 Ohio 4311 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 8× “Norman then filed an application for judgment and to confirm the arbitration award pursuant to R.C. 2711.09. Kellie Auto was served with Norman's application on June 30, 2017.”
Adams Cty./Ohio Valley Local Sch. v. OAPSE/AFSCME, Local 572, 2017 Ohio 6929 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “Under R.C. 2711.09, a trial court shall grant such an order and enter judgment thereon, unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 2711.”
Ignazio v. Clear Channel Broad., Inc., 865 N.E.2d 18 (Ohio 2007). · cites it 2× “” R.C. 2711.09, 2711.10, and 2711.11 permit a party to challenge the arbitration agreement in certain circumstances.”
Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. Cleveland, 2024 Ohio 2651 (Ohio 2024). · cites it 3× “{¶ 4} The city responded by filing an “Application to Confirm Arbitration Award” under R.C. 2711.09, along with a motion to dismiss or strike the union’s complaint.”
Dorset Twp. Bd. of Trs. v. T-Line EV, L.L.C., 2024 Ohio 6002 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 7× “On March 15, 2023, Dorset Township filed a complaint in the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas seeking to confirm the arbitration award pursuant to R.C. 2711.09 and a judgment for the $120,625 arbitration award.”
Show all 137 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2711.09(E) — 1 case
Summerville v. City of Forest Park, 2010 Ohio 6280 (Ohio 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.