Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award made in an arbitration proceeding, the court must enter judgment in conformity therewith.
BST Ohio Corp. v. Wolgang (Slip Opinion), 2021 Ohio 1785 (Ohio 2021). · cites it 3דConsequently, when a party applies to confirm (or for that matter, moves to vacate, modify, or correct) an arbitration award, as with any other motion or application, the onus is then on the other parties to the arbitration to respond, lest the trial court take the action of…”
Schaefer v. Allstate Ins., 590 N.E.2d 1242 (Ohio 1992). “See R.C. 2711.12. . See R.C. 2711.13. . See R.”
Buyer's First Realty, Inc. v. Cleveland Area Bd. of Realtors, 745 N.E.2d 1069 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2ד11, the judge must first enter an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating the award, and then he or she must enter judgment “in conformity therewith” as required by R.C. 2711.12. R.C. 2711.15 also reflects this two-step process, specifically allowing an appeal to…”
State ex rel. CNG Fin. Corp. v. Nadel, 855 N.E.2d 473 (Ohio 2006). “2d 929 , ¶ 22-24 (court of appeals erred in denying writs of procedendo and prohibition to compel judge to enter judgment confirming arbitration award and to prevent him from staying journalization of the judgment because under R.C. 2711.12, the judge had a clear legal duty to…”
Lockhart v. Am. Reserve Ins., 440 N.E.2d 1219 (Ohio Ct. App. 1981). “09 and R.C. 2711.12 (confirm and enter judgment); R.”
Sebold v. Latina Design Build Grp., L.L.C., 2021 Ohio 124 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “R.C. 2711.12. This court has noted that “[t]he very definition of arbitration requires a ‘final and binding award.”
Woods v. Farmers Ins. of Columbus, Inc., 666 N.E.2d 283 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995). “) R.C. 2711.12, redundant of R.C. 2711.09 as to confirmed arbitration awards, provides: “Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award made in an arbitration proceeding, the court must enter judgment in conformity therewith.”
Cuyahoga Cmty. Coll. v. Dist. 925, Serv. Employees Int'l Union, 537 N.E.2d 717 (Ohio Ct. App. 1988). “In its third assignment of error, the appellant claims that the trial court erred under R.C. 2711.12 in failing to enter a judgment on the arbitration award.”
Fowler v. Menards, Inc., 2018 Ohio 4052 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “" {¶ 17} R.C. 2711.12 states that "[u]pon the granting of an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award made in an arbitration proceeding, the court must enter judgment in conformity therewith.”
State ex rel. R.W. Sidley, Inc. v. Crawford, 100 Ohio St. 3d 113 (Ohio 2003). “) {¶ 20} R.C. 2711.12 provides: {¶ 21} “Upon the granting of an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award made in an arbitration proceeding, the court must enter judgment in conformity therewith.”
Carden v. Miami Hardware Appliance Co., Inc., 680 N.E.2d 717 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “Thereupon the court shall grant such an order and enter judgment thereon, unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 2711.”
Chardon Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Chardon Edn. Assn., 2013 Ohio 4547 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “{¶35} R.C. 2711.12 provides that “[u]pon the granting of an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award made in an arbitration proceeding, the court must enter judgment in conformity therewith.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.