When a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is presented, if it appears that the writ ought to issue, a court or judge authorized to grant the writ must grant it forthwith.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 45
cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Hammond v. Dallman, 590 N.E.2d 744 (Ohio 1992).
Hammond v. Dallman, 590 N.E.2d 744 (Ohio 1992). · cites it 5דWe find the petition in this case barely adequate to meet this existing standard and grant the writ pursuant to R.C. 2725.06. 2 Normally, the granting of the writ would cause us to order respondent to make a return pursuant to R.”
Chari v. Vore, 744 N.E.2d 763 (Ohio 2001). “R.C. 2725.06. Conversely, if the petition states a claim for which habeas corpus relief cannot be granted, the court should not allow the writ and should dismiss the petition.”
Pegan v. Crawmer, 653 N.E.2d 659 (Ohio 1995). · cites it 2דR.C. 2725.06. Conversely, if the petition states a claim for which habeas corpus relief cannot be granted, the court should not allow the writ and should dismiss the petition.”
In Re Gentry, 454 N.E.2d 987 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2דAs the petitioner is not contesting his original restraint but is only testing his continued restraint, pursuant to his allegation of “excessively high bail,” this court, on the face of the petition, granted the writ pursuant to R.C. 2725.06, and set the matter for trial on the…”
State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 72 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 1995). “Similarly, for habeas corpus actions, a petitioner must disclose his *110 claim with particularity in order to avoid dismissal under R.C. 2725.06. Hammond v. Dallman (1992), 63 Ohio St.”
State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaul, 652 N.E.2d 746 (Ohio 1995). “To avoid dismissal under R.C. 2725.06, a petition filed by or on behalf of a petitioner “alleged to be restrained of his liberty [who] is in the custody of an officer under process issued by a court or magistrate, or by virtue of the judgment or order of a court of record * * *…”
Chari v. Vore, 2001 Ohio 49 (Ohio 2001). “R.C. 2725.06. Conversely, if the petition states a claim for which habeas corpus relief cannot be granted, the court should not allow the writ and should dismiss the petition.”
State ex rel. Sneed v. Anderson, 866 N.E.2d 1084 (Ohio 2007). “R.C. 2725.06. Conversely, if the petition states a claim for which habeas corpus relief cannot be granted, the court should not allow the writ and should dismiss the petition.”
Jenkins v. Billy, 538 N.E.2d 1045 (Ohio 1989). “R.C. 2725.06 provides that “[w]hen a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is presented, if it appears that the writ ought to issue, a court or judge authorized to grant the writ must grant it forthwith.”
Lewis v. Telb, 497 N.E.2d 1376 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985). “04; therefore, this court granted the writ pursuant to R.C. 2725.06, and set the matter for a hearing on June 10, 1985.”
Turner v. Hooks, 2016 Ohio 3083 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “Conclusion {¶63} Turner’s petition of habeas corpus states a valid claim under R.C. 2725.06. The juvenile court failed to provide notice to Turner’s “parents, guardian, or other custodian” pursuant to R.”
Smith v. Leis, 847 N.E.2d 485 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “R.C. 2725.06. 17 . See Pegan v. Crawmer (1995), 73 Ohio St.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.