Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2915.11 (2026)

Bingo game operator requirements

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) No person shall be a bingo game operator unless he is eighteen years of age or older.

(B) No person who has been convicted of a felony or a gambling offense in any jurisdiction shall be a bingo game operator.

(C) Whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.

(D) Whoever violates division (B) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1964–2016 · leading case: State v. Wheeler, 2016 Ohio 2964 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Wheeler, 2016 Ohio 2964 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “11(E)(2) even where the R.C. 2915.11(A) offense was a minor misdemeanor.”
Mansfield v. Studer, 2012 Ohio 4840 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “Although not properly cited or presented to the jury, Studer’s action clearly manifested a reasonable belief that she was committing the crime of disorderly conduct with persistence a fourth degree misdemeanor in violation of R.C. 2915.11(E)(3). {¶92} In the case at bar, Deputy…”
State v. Lyle, 2014 Ohio 751 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “However, the judgment entry refers to R.C. 2915.11(A) & (C)(3)(c). (2010 CR 0087 Docket Nos.”
State v. Lisbon Sales Book Co., 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 482 (Ohio 1964). · cites it 14× “The appellants’ assignments of error may be summarized as follows: (1) The Court of Appeals erred in holding that said indictments set out sufficient facts to constitute, or state, an offense under Section 2915.11, Revised Code, or, in other words, that the reversal by the Court…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2915.11(A): 2 cases
State v. Wheeler, 2016 Ohio 2964 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “11(E)(2) even where the R.C. 2915.11(A) offense was a minor misdemeanor.”
State v. Lyle, 2014 Ohio 751 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “However, the judgment entry refers to R.C. 2915.11(A) & (C)(3)(c). (2010 CR 0087 Docket Nos.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2915.11(E)(3): 1 case
Mansfield v. Studer, 2012 Ohio 4840 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “Although not properly cited or presented to the jury, Studer’s action clearly manifested a reasonable belief that she was committing the crime of disorderly conduct with persistence a fourth degree misdemeanor in violation of R.C. 2915.11(E)(3). {¶92} In the case at bar, Deputy…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.