Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1,057
cases (
280 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case:
State v. Haller, 2012 Ohio 5233 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Haller, 2012 Ohio 5233 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 20× “{¶11} R.C. 2923.03, Ohio’s complicity statute, provides, in relevant part: (A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: -9- Case No.”
State v. Johnson, 754 N.E.2d 796 (Ohio 2001).
· cites it 11× “R.C. 2923.03 provides: “(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: $ * “(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense.”
State v. Neff, 2021 Ohio 3766 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 53× ““The effect of [R.C. 2923.03(D] is to leave the assessment of an accomplice’s credibility to a jury after it has been properly instructed concerning the treatment of that testimony.”
State v. Johnson, 2001 Ohio 1336 (Ohio 2001).
· cites it 12× “R.C. 2923.03 provides: “(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: “* * * “(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense.”
State v. Sheldon, 2019 Ohio 4123 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 18× “R.C. 2923.03 sets forth the offense of complicity and provides, in its relevant part, as follows: (A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: (1) Solicit or procure another to commit the offense.”
State v. Morris, 2021 Ohio 2646 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 8× “145; one count of Complicity to Aggravated Burglary, a first-degree felony, in violation of R.C. §2923.03(A)(2) and §2911.11(A)(2), and containing a firearm specification under R.”
State v. Perez, 2009 Ohio 6179 (Ohio 2009).
· cites it 6× “Perez concedes that Debra was not charged with complicity in his crimes, but he argues that there was sufficient evidence to charge her with aiding and abetting Perez, because she obtained and disposed of guns on his behalf and, according to Perez, knew that he was committing…”
Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (2007).
· cites it 4× “2d 1077, 1080-1082 (1987); Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2923.03; State v. Johnson, 93 Ohio St.”
State v. Johnson, 2016 Ohio 7266 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 14× “{¶ 120} In his eighth assignment of error, appellant argues the trial court erred by instructing the jury pursuant to R.C. 2923.03(D). Appellant contends that because Adams did not testify against him, the following jury instruction was improper: THE COURT: You have heard the…”
State v. Hanning, 728 N.E.2d 1059 (Ohio 2000).
· cites it 9× “Today we are asked to determine whether the complicity statute, R.C. 2923.03, applies to juvenile bindover criteria set forth in R.”
State v. Montgomery, 575 N.E.2d 167 (Ohio 1991).
· cites it 7× “, Glover Heard, in violation of former R.C. 2923.03(D), which provided: *417 “No person shall be convicted of complicity under this section solely upon the testimony of an accomplice, unsupported by other evidence.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(A) — 135 cases
Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (2007).
“2d 1077, 1080-1082 (1987); Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2923.03; State v. Johnson, 93 Ohio St.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(A)(1) — 55 cases
State v. Sheldon, 2019 Ohio 4123 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“R.C. 2923.03 sets forth the offense of complicity and provides, in its relevant part, as follows: (A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: (1) Solicit or procure another to commit the offense.”
State v. Neff, 2021 Ohio 3766 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
““The effect of [R.C. 2923.03(D] is to leave the assessment of an accomplice’s credibility to a jury after it has been properly instructed concerning the treatment of that testimony.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(A)(2) — 474 cases
State v. Haller, 2012 Ohio 5233 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
“{¶11} R.C. 2923.03, Ohio’s complicity statute, provides, in relevant part: (A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: -9- Case No.”
State v. Johnson, 754 N.E.2d 796 (Ohio 2001).
“R.C. 2923.03 provides: “(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: $ * “(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense.”
State v. Johnson, 2001 Ohio 1336 (Ohio 2001).
“R.C. 2923.03 provides: “(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: “* * * “(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense.”
State v. Morris, 2021 Ohio 2646 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
“145; one count of Complicity to Aggravated Burglary, a first-degree felony, in violation of R.C. §2923.03(A)(2) and §2911.11(A)(2), and containing a firearm specification under R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(A)(2)(C)(1) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(A)(2)(F) — 6 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(A)(3) — 15 cases
State v. Johnson, 754 N.E.2d 796 (Ohio 2001).
“R.C. 2923.03 provides: “(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: $ * “(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense.”
State v. Johnson, 2001 Ohio 1336 (Ohio 2001).
“R.C. 2923.03 provides: “(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: “* * * “(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(A)(4) — 9 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(AX2) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(B) — 21 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(B)(4) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(C) — 12 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(D) — 111 cases
State v. Perez, 2009 Ohio 6179 (Ohio 2009).
“Perez concedes that Debra was not charged with complicity in his crimes, but he argues that there was sufficient evidence to charge her with aiding and abetting Perez, because she obtained and disposed of guns on his behalf and, according to Perez, knew that he was committing…”
State v. Johnson, 2016 Ohio 7266 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“{¶ 120} In his eighth assignment of error, appellant argues the trial court erred by instructing the jury pursuant to R.C. 2923.03(D). Appellant contends that because Adams did not testify against him, the following jury instruction was improper: THE COURT: You have heard the…”
State v. Montgomery, 575 N.E.2d 167 (Ohio 1991).
“, Glover Heard, in violation of former R.C. 2923.03(D), which provided: *417 “No person shall be convicted of complicity under this section solely upon the testimony of an accomplice, unsupported by other evidence.”
State v. Sheldon, 2019 Ohio 4123 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“R.C. 2923.03 sets forth the offense of complicity and provides, in its relevant part, as follows: (A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: (1) Solicit or procure another to commit the offense.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(D)(1) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(E) — 10 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(F) — 330 cases
State v. Neff, 2021 Ohio 3766 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
““The effect of [R.C. 2923.03(D] is to leave the assessment of an accomplice’s credibility to a jury after it has been properly instructed concerning the treatment of that testimony.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(a)(1) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.03(a)(2)(f) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.