Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11 (2026)

Possession of controlled substances

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.

(B)(1) This section does not apply to any of the following:

(a) Manufacturers, licensed health professionals authorized to prescribe drugs, pharmacists, owners of pharmacies, and other persons whose conduct was in accordance with Chapters 3719., 4715., 4723., 4729., 4730., 4731., 4741., and 4772. of the Revised Code;

(b) If the offense involves an anabolic steroid, any person who is conducting or participating in a research project involving the use of an anabolic steroid if the project has been approved by the United States food and drug administration;

(c) Any person who sells, offers for sale, prescribes, dispenses, or administers for livestock or other nonhuman species an anabolic steroid that is expressly intended for administration through implants to livestock or other nonhuman species and approved for that purpose under the "Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act," 52 Stat. 1040 (1938), 21 U.S.C.A. 301, as amended, and is sold, offered for sale, prescribed, dispensed, or administered for that purpose in accordance with that act;

(d) Any person who obtained the controlled substance pursuant to a prescription issued by a licensed health professional authorized to prescribe drugs if the prescription was issued for a legitimate medical purpose and not altered, forged, or obtained through deception or commission of a theft offense.

As used in division (B)(1)(d) of this section, "deception" and "theft offense" have the same meanings as in section 2913.01 of the Revised Code.

(2)(a) As used in division (B)(2) of this section:

(i) "Community addiction services provider" has the same meaning as in section 5119.01 of the Revised Code.

(ii) "Community control sanction" has the same meaning as in section 2929.01 of the Revised Code.

(iii) "Health care facility" has the same meaning as in section 2919.16 of the Revised Code.

(iv) "Minor drug possession offense" means a violation of this section that is a misdemeanor or a felony of the fifth degree.

(v) "Post-release control sanction" has the same meaning as in section 2967.28 of the Revised Code.

(vi) "Peace officer" has the same meaning as in section 2935.01 of the Revised Code.

(vii) "Public agency" has the same meaning as in section 2930.01 of the Revised Code.

(viii) "Qualified individual" means a person who is acting in good faith who seeks or obtains medical assistance for another person who is experiencing a drug overdose, a person who experiences a drug overdose and who seeks medical assistance for that overdose, or a person who is the subject of another person seeking or obtaining medical assistance for that overdose as described in division (B)(2)(b) of this section.

(ix) "Seek or obtain medical assistance" includes, but is not limited to making a 9-1-1 call, contacting in person or by telephone call an on-duty peace officer, or transporting or presenting a person to a health care facility.

(b) Subject to division (B)(2)(e) of this section, a qualified individual shall not be arrested, charged, prosecuted, convicted, or penalized pursuant to this chapter for a minor drug possession offense or a violation of section 2925.12, division (C)(1) of section 2925.14, or section 2925.141 of the Revised Code if all of the following apply:

(i) The evidence of the obtaining, possession, or use of the controlled substance or controlled substance analog, drug abuse instruments, or drug paraphernalia that would be the basis of the offense was obtained as a result of the qualified individual seeking the medical assistance or experiencing an overdose and needing medical assistance.

(ii) Subject to division (B)(2)(f) of this section, within thirty days after seeking or obtaining the medical assistance, the qualified individual seeks and obtains a screening and receives a referral for treatment from a community addiction services provider or a properly credentialed addiction treatment professional.

(iii) Subject to division (B)(2)(f) of this section, the qualified individual who obtains a screening and receives a referral for treatment under division (B)(2)(b)(ii) of this section, upon the request of any prosecuting attorney, submits documentation to the prosecuting attorney that verifies that the qualified individual satisfied the requirements of that division. The documentation shall be limited to the date and time of the screening obtained and referral received.

(c) If a person who is serving a community control sanction or is under a sanction on post-release control acts pursuant to division (B)(2)(b) of this section, then division (B) of section 2929.141, division (B)(2) of section 2929.15, division (D)(3) of section 2929.25, or division (F)(3) of section 2967.28 of the Revised Code applies to the person with respect to any violation of the sanction or post-release control sanction based on a minor drug possession offense, as defined in section 2925.11 of the Revised Code, or a violation of section 2925.12, division (C)(1) of section 2925.14, or section 2925.141 of the Revised Code.

(d) Nothing in division (B)(2)(b) of this section shall be construed to do any of the following:

(i) Limit the admissibility of any evidence in connection with the investigation or prosecution of a crime with regards to a defendant who does not qualify for the protections of division (B)(2)(b) of this section or with regards to any crime other than a minor drug possession offense or a violation of section 2925.12, division (C)(1) of section 2925.14, or section 2925.141 of the Revised Code committed by a person who qualifies for protection pursuant to division (B)(2)(b) of this section;

(ii) Limit any seizure of evidence or contraband otherwise permitted by law;

(iii) Limit or abridge the authority of a peace officer to detain or take into custody a person in the course of an investigation or to effectuate an arrest for any offense except as provided in that division;

(iv) Limit, modify, or remove any immunity from liability available pursuant to law in effect prior to September 13, 2016, to any public agency or to an employee of any public agency.

(e) Division (B)(2)(b) of this section does not apply to any person who twice previously has been granted an immunity under division (B)(2)(b) of this section. No person shall be granted an immunity under division (B)(2)(b) of this section more than two times.

(f) Nothing in this section shall compel any qualified individual to disclose protected health information in a way that conflicts with the requirements of the "Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996," 104 Pub. L. No. 191, 110 Stat. 2021, 42 U.S.C. 1320d et seq., as amended, and regulations promulgated by the United States department of health and human services to implement the act or the requirements of 42 C.F.R. Part 2.

(C) Whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of one of the following:

(1) If the drug involved in the violation is a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance included in schedule I or II, with the exception of marihuana, cocaine, L.S.D., heroin, any fentanyl-related compound, hashish, and any controlled substance analog, whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of aggravated possession of drugs. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(1)(b), (c), (d), or (e) of this section, aggravated possession of drugs is a felony of the fifth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(b) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds the bulk amount but is less than five times the bulk amount, aggravated possession of drugs is a felony of the third degree, and there is a presumption for a prison term for the offense.

(c) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds five times the bulk amount but is less than fifty times the bulk amount, aggravated possession of drugs is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a second degree felony mandatory prison term.

(d) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds fifty times the bulk amount but is less than one hundred times the bulk amount, aggravated possession of drugs is a felony of the first degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(e) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one hundred times the bulk amount, aggravated possession of drugs is a felony of the first degree, the offender is a major drug offender, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a maximum first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(2) If the drug involved in the violation is a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance included in schedule III, IV, or V, whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of possession of drugs. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(2)(b), (c), or (d) of this section, possession of drugs is a misdemeanor of the first degree or, if the offender previously has been convicted of a drug abuse offense, a felony of the fifth degree.

(b) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds the bulk amount but is less than five times the bulk amount, possession of drugs is a felony of the fourth degree, and division (C) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(c) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds five times the bulk amount but is less than fifty times the bulk amount, possession of drugs is a felony of the third degree, and there is a presumption for a prison term for the offense.

(d) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds fifty times the bulk amount, possession of drugs is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose upon the offender as a mandatory prison term a second degree felony mandatory prison term.

(3) If the drug involved in the violation is marihuana or a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance containing marihuana other than hashish, whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of possession of marihuana. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(3)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), or (g) of this section, possession of marihuana is a minor misdemeanor.

(b) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one hundred grams but is less than two hundred grams, possession of marihuana is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.

(c) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds two hundred grams but is less than one thousand grams, possession of marihuana is a felony of the fifth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(d) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one thousand grams but is less than five thousand grams, possession of marihuana is a felony of the third degree, and division (C) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(e) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds five thousand grams but is less than twenty thousand grams, possession of marihuana is a felony of the third degree, and there is a presumption that a prison term shall be imposed for the offense.

(f) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds twenty thousand grams but is less than forty thousand grams, possession of marihuana is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a second degree felony mandatory prison term of five, six, seven, or eight years.

(g) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds forty thousand grams, possession of marihuana is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a maximum second degree felony mandatory prison term.

(4) If the drug involved in the violation is cocaine or a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance containing cocaine, whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of possession of cocaine. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(4)(b), (c), (d), (e), or (f) of this section, possession of cocaine is a felony of the fifth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(b) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds five grams but is less than ten grams of cocaine, possession of cocaine is a felony of the fourth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(c) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds ten grams but is less than twenty grams of cocaine, possession of cocaine is a felony of the third degree, and, except as otherwise provided in this division, there is a presumption for a prison term for the offense. If possession of cocaine is a felony of the third degree under this division and if the offender two or more times previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a felony drug abuse offense, the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term one of the prison terms prescribed for a felony of the third degree.

(d) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds twenty grams but is less than twenty-seven grams of cocaine, possession of cocaine is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a second degree felony mandatory prison term.

(e) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds twenty-seven grams but is less than one hundred grams of cocaine, possession of cocaine is a felony of the first degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(f) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one hundred grams of cocaine, possession of cocaine is a felony of the first degree, the offender is a major drug offender, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a maximum first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(5) If the drug involved in the violation is L.S.D., whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of possession of L.S.D. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(5)(b), (c), (d), (e), or (f) of this section, possession of L.S.D. is a felony of the fifth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(b) If the amount of L.S.D. involved equals or exceeds ten unit doses but is less than fifty unit doses of L.S.D. in a solid form or equals or exceeds one gram but is less than five grams of L.S.D. in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of L.S.D. is a felony of the fourth degree, and division (C) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(c) If the amount of L.S.D. involved equals or exceeds fifty unit doses, but is less than two hundred fifty unit doses of L.S.D. in a solid form or equals or exceeds five grams but is less than twenty-five grams of L.S.D. in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of L.S.D. is a felony of the third degree, and there is a presumption for a prison term for the offense.

(d) If the amount of L.S.D. involved equals or exceeds two hundred fifty unit doses but is less than one thousand unit doses of L.S.D. in a solid form or equals or exceeds twenty-five grams but is less than one hundred grams of L.S.D. in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of L.S.D. is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a second degree felony mandatory prison term.

(e) If the amount of L.S.D. involved equals or exceeds one thousand unit doses but is less than five thousand unit doses of L.S.D. in a solid form or equals or exceeds one hundred grams but is less than five hundred grams of L.S.D. in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of L.S.D. is a felony of the first degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(f) If the amount of L.S.D. involved equals or exceeds five thousand unit doses of L.S.D. in a solid form or equals or exceeds five hundred grams of L.S.D. in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of L.S.D. is a felony of the first degree, the offender is a major drug offender, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a maximum first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(6) If the drug involved in the violation is heroin or a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance containing heroin, whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of possession of heroin. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(6)(b), (c), (d), (e), or (f) of this section, possession of heroin is a felony of the fifth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(b) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds ten unit doses but is less than fifty unit doses or equals or exceeds one gram but is less than five grams, possession of heroin is a felony of the fourth degree, and division (C) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(c) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds fifty unit doses but is less than one hundred unit doses or equals or exceeds five grams but is less than ten grams, possession of heroin is a felony of the third degree, and there is a presumption for a prison term for the offense.

(d) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one hundred unit doses but is less than five hundred unit doses or equals or exceeds ten grams but is less than fifty grams, possession of heroin is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a second degree felony mandatory prison term.

(e) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds five hundred unit doses but is less than one thousand unit doses or equals or exceeds fifty grams but is less than one hundred grams, possession of heroin is a felony of the first degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(f) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one thousand unit doses or equals or exceeds one hundred grams, possession of heroin is a felony of the first degree, the offender is a major drug offender, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a maximum first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(7) If the drug involved in the violation is hashish or a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance containing hashish, whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of possession of hashish. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(7)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), or (g) of this section, possession of hashish is a minor misdemeanor.

(b) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds five grams but is less than ten grams of hashish in a solid form or equals or exceeds one gram but is less than two grams of hashish in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of hashish is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.

(c) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds ten grams but is less than fifty grams of hashish in a solid form or equals or exceeds two grams but is less than ten grams of hashish in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of hashish is a felony of the fifth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(d) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds fifty grams but is less than two hundred fifty grams of hashish in a solid form or equals or exceeds ten grams but is less than fifty grams of hashish in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of hashish is a felony of the third degree, and division (C) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(e) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds two hundred fifty grams but is less than one thousand grams of hashish in a solid form or equals or exceeds fifty grams but is less than two hundred grams of hashish in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of hashish is a felony of the third degree, and there is a presumption that a prison term shall be imposed for the offense.

(f) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one thousand grams but is less than two thousand grams of hashish in a solid form or equals or exceeds two hundred grams but is less than four hundred grams of hashish in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of hashish is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a second degree felony mandatory prison term of five, six, seven, or eight years.

(g) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds two thousand grams of hashish in a solid form or equals or exceeds four hundred grams of hashish in a liquid concentrate, liquid extract, or liquid distillate form, possession of hashish is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a maximum second degree felony mandatory prison term.

(8) If the drug involved is a controlled substance analog or compound, mixture, preparation, or substance that contains a controlled substance analog, whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of possession of a controlled substance analog. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(8)(b), (c), (d), (e), or (f) of this section, possession of a controlled substance analog is a felony of the fifth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(b) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds ten grams but is less than twenty grams, possession of a controlled substance analog is a felony of the fourth degree, and there is a presumption for a prison term for the offense.

(c) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds twenty grams but is less than thirty grams, possession of a controlled substance analog is a felony of the third degree, and there is a presumption for a prison term for the offense.

(d) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds thirty grams but is less than forty grams, possession of a controlled substance analog is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a second degree felony mandatory prison term.

(e) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds forty grams but is less than fifty grams, possession of a controlled substance analog is a felony of the first degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(f) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds fifty grams, possession of a controlled substance analog is a felony of the first degree, the offender is a major drug offender, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term a maximum first degree felony mandatory prison term.

(9) If the drug involved in the violation is a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance that is a combination of a fentanyl-related compound and marihuana, one of the following applies:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(9)(b) of this section, the offender is guilty of possession of marihuana and shall be punished as provided in division (C)(3) of this section. Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(9)(b) of this section, the offender is not guilty of possession of a fentanyl-related compound under division (C)(11) of this section and shall not be charged with, convicted of, or punished under division (C)(11) of this section for possession of a fentanyl-related compound.

(b) If the offender knows or has reason to know that the compound, mixture, preparation, or substance that is the drug involved contains a fentanyl-related compound, the offender is guilty of possession of a fentanyl-related compound and shall be punished under division (C)(11) of this section.

(10) If the drug involved in the violation is a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance that is a combination of a fentanyl-related compound and any schedule III, schedule IV, or schedule V controlled substance that is not a fentanyl-related compound, one of the following applies:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(10)(b) of this section, the offender is guilty of possession of drugs and shall be punished as provided in division (C)(2) of this section. Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(10)(b) of this section, the offender is not guilty of possession of a fentanyl-related compound under division (C)(11) of this section and shall not be charged with, convicted of, or punished under division (C)(11) of this section for possession of a fentanyl-related compound.

(b) If the offender knows or has reason to know that the compound, mixture, preparation, or substance that is the drug involved contains a fentanyl-related compound, the offender is guilty of possession of a fentanyl-related compound and shall be punished under division (C)(11) of this section.

(11) If the drug involved in the violation is a fentanyl-related compound and neither division (C)(9)(a) nor division (C)(10)(a) of this section applies to the drug involved, or is a compound, mixture, preparation, or substance that contains a fentanyl-related compound or is a combination of a fentanyl-related compound and any other controlled substance and neither division (C)(9)(a) nor division (C)(10)(a) of this section applies to the drug involved, whoever violates division (A) of this section is guilty of possession of a fentanyl-related compound. The penalty for the offense shall be determined as follows:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in division (C)(11)(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), or (g) of this section, possession of a fentanyl-related compound is a felony of the fifth degree, and division (B) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(b) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds ten unit doses but is less than fifty unit doses or equals or exceeds one gram but is less than five grams, possession of a fentanyl-related compound is a felony of the fourth degree, and division (C) of section 2929.13 of the Revised Code applies in determining whether to impose a prison term on the offender.

(c) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds fifty unit doses but is less than one hundred unit doses or equals or exceeds five grams but is less than ten grams, possession of a fentanyl-related compound is a felony of the third degree, and there is a presumption for a prison term for the offense.

(d) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one hundred unit doses but is less than two hundred unit doses or equals or exceeds ten grams but is less than twenty grams, possession of a fentanyl-related compound is a felony of the second degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term one of the prison terms prescribed for a felony of the second degree.

(e) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds two hundred unit doses but is less than five hundred unit doses or equals or exceeds twenty grams but is less than fifty grams, possession of a fentanyl-related compound is a felony of the first degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term one of the prison terms prescribed for a felony of the first degree.

(f) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds five hundred unit doses but is less than one thousand unit doses or equals or exceeds fifty grams but is less than one hundred grams, possession of a fentanyl-related compound is a felony of the first degree, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term the maximum prison term prescribed for a felony of the first degree.

(g) If the amount of the drug involved equals or exceeds one thousand unit doses or equals or exceeds one hundred grams, possession of a fentanyl-related compound is a felony of the first degree, the offender is a major drug offender, and the court shall impose as a mandatory prison term the maximum prison term prescribed for a felony of the first degree.

(D) Arrest or conviction for a minor misdemeanor violation of this section does not constitute a criminal record and need not be reported by the person so arrested or convicted in response to any inquiries about the person's criminal record, including any inquiries contained in any application for employment, license, or other right or privilege, or made in connection with the person's appearance as a witness.

(E) In addition to any prison term or jail term authorized or required by division (C) of this section and sections 2929.13, 2929.14, 2929.22, 2929.24, and 2929.25 of the Revised Code and in addition to any other sanction that is imposed for the offense under this section, sections 2929.11 to 2929.18, or sections 2929.21 to 2929.28 of the Revised Code, if applicable, the court also shall do the following:

(1)(a) If the violation is a felony of the first, second, or third degree, the court shall impose upon the offender the mandatory fine specified for the offense under division (B)(1) of section 2929.18 of the Revised Code unless, as specified in that division, the court determines that the offender is indigent.

(b) Notwithstanding any contrary provision of section 3719.21 of the Revised Code, the clerk of the court shall pay a mandatory fine or other fine imposed for a violation of this section pursuant to division (A) of section 2929.18 of the Revised Code in accordance with and subject to the requirements of division (F) of section 2925.03 of the Revised Code. The agency that receives the fine shall use the fine as specified in division (F) of section 2925.03 of the Revised Code.

(c) If a person is charged with a violation of this section that is a felony of the first, second, or third degree, posts bail, and forfeits the bail, the clerk shall pay the forfeited bail pursuant to division (E)(1)(b) of this section as if it were a mandatory fine imposed under division (E)(1)(a) of this section.

(2) If the offender is a professionally licensed person, in addition to any other sanction imposed for a violation of this section, the court immediately shall comply with section 2925.38 of the Revised Code.

(3) If the offender has a driver's or commercial driver's license or permit, section 2929.33 of the Revised Code applies.

(F) It is an affirmative defense, as provided in section 2901.05 of the Revised Code, to a charge of a fourth degree felony violation under this section that the controlled substance that gave rise to the charge is in an amount, is in a form, is prepared, compounded, or mixed with substances that are not controlled substances in a manner, or is possessed under any other circumstances, that indicate that the substance was possessed solely for personal use. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this section, if, in accordance with section 2901.05 of the Revised Code, an accused who is charged with a fourth degree felony violation of division (C)(2), (4), (5), or (6) of this section sustains the burden of going forward with evidence of and establishes by a preponderance of the evidence the affirmative defense described in this division, the accused may be prosecuted for and may plead guilty to or be convicted of a misdemeanor violation of division (C)(2) of this section or a fifth degree felony violation of division (C)(4), (5), or (6) of this section respectively.

(G) When a person is charged with possessing a bulk amount or multiple of a bulk amount, division (E) of section 2925.03 of the Revised Code applies regarding the determination of the amount of the controlled substance involved at the time of the offense.

(H) It is an affirmative defense to a charge of possession of a controlled substance analog under division (C)(8) of this section that the person charged with violating that offense obtained, possessed, or used one of the following items that are excluded from the meaning of "controlled substance analog" under section 3719.01 of the Revised Code:

(1) A controlled substance;

(2) Any substance for which there is an approved new drug application;

(3) With respect to a particular person, any substance if an exemption is in effect for investigational use for that person pursuant to federal law to the extent that conduct with respect to that substance is pursuant to that exemption.

(I) Any offender who received a mandatory suspension of the offender's driver's or commercial driver's license or permit under this section prior to September 13, 2016, may file a motion with the sentencing court requesting the termination of the suspension. However, an offender who pleaded guilty to or was convicted of a violation of section 4511.19 of the Revised Code or a substantially similar municipal ordinance or law of another state or the United States that arose out of the same set of circumstances as the violation for which the offender's license or permit was suspended under this section shall not file such a motion.

Upon the filing of a motion under division (I) of this section, the sentencing court, in its discretion, may terminate the suspension.

The Legislative Service Commission presents the text of this section as a composite of the section as amended by multiple acts of the General Assembly. This presentation recognizes the principle stated in R.C. 1.52(B) that amendments are to be harmonized if reasonably capable of simultaneous operation.

Last updated January 27, 2025 at 3:00 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3,724 cases (1,240 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. · cites it 89× “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. · cites it 84× “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Eafford, 2012-Ohio-2224, 132 Ohio St. 3d 159. · cites it 39× “{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals vacating Donald Eafford’s felony sentence for possession of cocaine and holding that Eafford was convicted only of misdemeanor possession of drugs because the jury-verdict form did not state…”
State v. Woodard, 2017-Ohio-6941. · cites it 34× “This court and many others have held that the simultaneous possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses that do not merge as allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2925.11. See, e.g., State v. Graves, 12th Dist.”
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. · cites it 59× “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Gipson, 687 N.E.2d 750 (Ohio 1998). · cites it 28× “Chapter 2925 provide for the imposition of mandatory fines for certain drug-related offenses, including certain drug abuse offenses in violation of R.C. 2925.11, and refer to a specific statutory procedure by which an offender who is both indigent and unable to pay may avoid…”
State v. Cabrales, 886 N.E.2d 181 (Ohio 2008). · cites it 15× “Introduction {¶ 1} The issue before the court is whether possession of a controlled substance under R.C. 2925.11(A), trafficking in a controlled substance under R.”
City of Akron v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-4500, 122 N.E.3d 672. · cites it 56× “Brown argues that the trial court erred by applying a narrow interpretation of the immunity provision of R.C. 2925.11 and in concluding that Ms. Brown was not entitled to immunity for the offenses charged as a result of her overdose.”
State v. Collier, 581 N.E.2d 552 (Ohio 1991). · cites it 24× “The issue presented for our review is whether R.C. 2925.11 is unconstitutionally void for vagueness.”
State v. Gipson, 80 Ohio St. 3d 626 (1998). · cites it 38× “In December 1994, Gipson was indicted by the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury for possession of cocaine (in less than the bulk amount), a drug of abuse, in violation of former R.C. 2925.11 (145 Ohio Laws, Part III, 5781).”
State v. Wheeler, 2016-Ohio-2964. · cites it 22× “11(E) and (E)(2) demonstrates that the ‘in addition to’ introductory phrases to R.C. 2925.11 do not act to limit the license suspension provisions of R.”
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. · cites it 35× “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
Show all 3,724 citing cases →
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(1)(C)(d): 1 case
State v. Bumgardner, 2017-Ohio-50.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A): 2403 cases
State v. Cabrales, 886 N.E.2d 181 (Ohio 2008). “Introduction {¶ 1} The issue before the court is whether possession of a controlled substance under R.C. 2925.11(A), trafficking in a controlled substance under R.”
State v. Eafford, 2012-Ohio-2224, 132 Ohio St. 3d 159. “{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals vacating Donald Eafford’s felony sentence for possession of cocaine and holding that Eafford was convicted only of misdemeanor possession of drugs because the jury-verdict form did not state…”
State v. Woodard, 2017-Ohio-6941. “This court and many others have held that the simultaneous possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses that do not merge as allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2925.11. See, e.g., State v. Graves, 12th Dist.”
State v. Frierson, 2018-Ohio-391, 105 N.E.3d 583.
State v. Johnson, 2021-Ohio-1768, 173 N.E.3d 94.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(1): 22 cases
State v. Pierce, 2010-Ohio-478.
State v. Brooks, 2020-Ohio-4123, 157 N.E.3d 387.
State v. Lester, 2020-Ohio-2988.
State v. Brown Suber, 2021-Ohio-2291.
State v. Daniels, 2024-Ohio-1536.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(1)(6)(a): 1 case
State v. Clark, 2020-Ohio-5013.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(1)(C)(1): 4 cases
State v. Houston, 2013-Ohio-686.
State v. Turner, 2023-Ohio-441.
State v. Mobley, 2009-Ohio-5434.
State v. Ball, 2012-Ohio-4678.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(1)(C)(6): 1 case
State v. Franklin, 2014-Ohio-4152.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(1)(a): 1 case
In re S.I.G., 2023-Ohio-2912, 223 N.E.3d 804.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(1)(c): 1 case
State v. Foreman, 2020-Ohio-3145, 155 N.E.3d 168.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(2): 14 cases
State v. Cotto, 2019-Ohio-985.
State v. Rainey, 2023-Ohio-4666.
State v. Alley, 2024-Ohio-115, 233 N.E.3d 1137.
State v. Holsinger, 2022-Ohio-4092.
State v. Jones, 2011-Ohio-1108.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(2)(C)(1): 2 cases
State v. McCauley, 2020-Ohio-2813.
McCauley v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst., No. 2:20-cv-04957 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 4, 2020).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(2)(C)(3): 1 case
State v. Davis, 2011-Ohio-5441.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(3): 3 cases
State v. Bika, 2019-Ohio-3841.
State v. Reglus, 2012-Ohio-1174.
State v. Romero, 2017-Ohio-2950.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(4): 1 case
State v. Johnson, 2025-Ohio-1009.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(4)(c): 1 case
State v. Hammond, 2016-Ohio-971.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(6)(a): 1 case
State v. Whitacker, 2020-Ohio-4249.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C): 7 cases
State v. Gross, 2019-Ohio-5304.
State v. Benson, 2019-Ohio-4635.
State v. Double, 2021-Ohio-632, 168 N.E.3d 899.
State v. Polite, 2018-Ohio-1372.
State v. Carpenter, 2023-Ohio-2014.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1): 22 cases
State v. Graham, 2017-Ohio-908.
State v. Bertuzzi, 2014-Ohio-5093.
State v. Jackson, 2015-Ohio-5246.
State v. Ellis, 2014-Ohio-4186.
State v. Whitacker, 2020-Ohio-4249.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1)(A): 1 case
State v. Beckley, 2019-Ohio-3122.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1)(C): 4 cases
State v. Oder, 2022-Ohio-3048.
State v. Edwards, 2021-Ohio-1917.
State v. Lanier, 2023-Ohio-3088.
State v. Henry, 2026-Ohio-1012.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1)(D): 2 cases
State v. Edwards, 2021-Ohio-1917.
State v. Shipp, 2026-Ohio-416.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1)(a): 86 cases
State v. Roberts, 2020-Ohio-6722.
State v. Pettorini, 2021-Ohio-1512.
State v. Hale, 2024-Ohio-4866, 249 N.E.3d 166.
State v. Link, 2022-Ohio-2067.
State v. Sheets, 2018-Ohio-996.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1)(b): 33 cases
State v. Stiltner, 2019-Ohio-4631.
State v. Johns, 2019-Ohio-4269, 146 N.E.3d 1286.
State v. Corbett, 2023-Ohio-556, 209 N.E.3d 280.
State v. Isenogle, 2022-Ohio-1257.
State v. Just., 2013-Ohio-2049.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1)(c): 44 cases
State v. Hale, 2024-Ohio-4866, 249 N.E.3d 166.
State v. Brown, 2023-Ohio-3906.
State v. Houston, 2013-Ohio-686.
State v. Alexander-Lindsey, 2016-Ohio-3033, 65 N.E.3d 129.
State v. Dixon, 2012-Ohio-4428.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1)(d): 9 cases
State v. Windland, 2024-Ohio-1760.
State v. Edwards, 2021-Ohio-1917.
Stae v. Allen, 2018-Ohio-3240.
State v. David, 2017-Ohio-1102.
State v. Brown, 2022-Ohio-893.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(1)(e): 6 cases
State v. Corbett, 2023-Ohio-556, 209 N.E.3d 280.
State v. McElfresh, 2014-Ohio-2605.
State v. Ball, 2023-Ohio-235.
State v. McAllister, 2020-Ohio-4492.
State v. Crane, 2023-Ohio-188.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11): 1 case
State v. Troche, 2023-Ohio-565.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11)(A): 1 case
State v. Grimm, 2023-Ohio-4458.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11)(E): 2 cases
State v. Harvey, 2022-Ohio-3111.
State v. Shipp, 2026-Ohio-416.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11)(a): 6 cases
State v. Isenogle, 2022-Ohio-1257.
State v. Thomas, 2021-Ohio-329.
State v. Eggleston, 2022-Ohio-2889.
State v. Clay, 2025-Ohio-664.
State v. Scott, 2025-Ohio-1572.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11)(b): 4 cases
State v. Smith, 2024-Ohio-3066.
State v. Miller, 2024-Ohio-4520.
State v. Gordon, 2025-Ohio-1667.
State v. Alvendia, 2024-Ohio-2012.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11)(c): 5 cases
State v. Windland, 2024-Ohio-1760.
State v. Ruggly, 2022-Ohio-3730, 199 N.E.3d 180.
State v. Williams, 2022-Ohio-603.
State v. Kennard, 2024-Ohio-2205.
State v. Brooks, 2023-Ohio-1631.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11)(d): 7 cases
State v. Sipperley, 2020-Ohio-4609.
State v. Miller, 2024-Ohio-4520.
State v. Kennard, 2024-Ohio-1791.
State v. Kennard, 2024-Ohio-1820.
Cooper, No. 5:24-cv-02142 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2026).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11)(e): 1 case
State v. Smith, 2024-Ohio-3066.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(11)(g): 5 cases
State v. Corbett, 2023-Ohio-556, 209 N.E.3d 280.
State v. Hill, 2021-Ohio-1946.
State v. Ball, 2023-Ohio-235.
State v. Gibbs, 2023-Ohio-4223.
State v. Hill, 2023-Ohio-4381.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(2): 4 cases
State v. Cain, 2016-Ohio-7460.
State v. Higgins, 2019-Ohio-3081.
State v. Gordon, 2013-Ohio-4997.
State v. Anderson, 2013-Ohio-2786.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(2)(B): 1 case
State v. Edwards, 2021-Ohio-1917.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(2)(a): 12 cases
State v. Sipperley, 2020-Ohio-4609.
State v. Lenzy, 2018-Ohio-3485.
State v. Evans, 2023-Ohio-237.
State v. Louden, 2014-Ohio-3059.
State v. Aylward, 823 N.E.2d 894 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 2004).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(2)(b): 4 cases
State v. Aylward, 823 N.E.2d 894 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 2004).
State v. Edwards, 2021-Ohio-1917.
State v. Council, 2017-Ohio-9047.
State v. Bevington, 2012-Ohio-6285.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3): 11 cases
State v. Lindow, 2016-Ohio-913.
State v. Owens, 910 N.E.2d 1059 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2009).
State v. Brooks, 2016-Ohio-7025.
State v. Rice, 2016-Ohio-8443.
State v. Greer, 2013-Ohio-4267.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3)(a): 27 cases
State v. Dale, 2013-Ohio-2229.
State v. Cauthon, 2019-Ohio-1809.
State v. Ahmad, 2018-Ohio-3556.
State v. Hughes, 2018-Ohio-5069.
State v. Goble, 2014-Ohio-3967, 20 N.E.3d 280.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3)(b): 2 cases
State v. Henry, 2026-Ohio-1012.
State v. Smith, 2013-Ohio-3330.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3)(c): 8 cases
State v. Woods, 2013-Ohio-1136.
State v. Corpening, 2019-Ohio-4833.
State v. Saylor, 2019-Ohio-1025.
State v. Martinez, 2012-Ohio-3750.
State v. Inskeep, 2016-Ohio-7098.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3)(d): 10 cases
State v. Culberson, 2012-Ohio-448, 968 N.E.2d 597.
State v. Graves, 2014-Ohio-5477.
State v. Inskeep, 2016-Ohio-7098.
State v. Diaz, 2017-Ohio-262.
State v. David, 2017-Ohio-1102.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3)(e): 5 cases
State v. Bowerman, 2014-Ohio-4264.
State v. Tillman, 2022-Ohio-4341, 203 N.E.3d 71.
State v. Martin, 2020-Ohio-3579.
State v. Lyttle, 2013-Ohio-2608.
State v. Collins, 2020-Ohio-3356, 155 N.E.3d 232.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3)(f): 10 cases
State v. Dalpiaz, 783 N.E.2d 976 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 2002).
State v. Vu, 2012-Ohio-746.
State v. Martinez, 2012-Ohio-3750.
State v. Hoang, 2012-Ohio-3741.
State v. Owens, 910 N.E.2d 1059 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2009).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3)(g): 5 cases
State v. Hill, 2018-Ohio-3901.
State v. Perkins, 2013-Ohio-3409.
State v. Hill, 2019-Ohio-1606.
State v. Hill, 2020-Ohio-4050.
Dunlap v. Warden, Belmont Corr. Inst., No. 2:21-cv-05849, 2022 WL 16950956 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 15, 2022).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(3)(h): 1 case
State v. Jones, 2018-Ohio-4493.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4): 16 cases
State v. Graham, 2017-Ohio-908.
State v. Rice, 2016-Ohio-8443.
State v. Hayes, 2013-Ohio-2429.
State v. Gales, 2022-Ohio-776.
State v. Stallworth, 2011-Ohio-4492.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(A): 1 case
State v. Anderson, 2016-Ohio-4651.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(B): 1 case
State v. Keefer, 2019-Ohio-2419, 138 N.E.3d 519.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(E): 1 case
State v. Shipp, 2026-Ohio-416.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(a): 46 cases
State v. Corson, 2015-Ohio-5332.
State v. Campbell, 2019-Ohio-583.
State v. Urdiales, 2015-Ohio-3632.
State v. Meeks, 2023-Ohio-4606.
In re D.W., 921 N.E.2d 1114 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2009).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(b): 17 cases
State v. Campbell, 2019-Ohio-583.
State v. Clark, 2024-Ohio-4930.
State v. Simmons, 2011-Ohio-2625.
State v. Simmons, 2014-Ohio-1014.
State v. Gordon, 2025-Ohio-1667.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(c): 6 cases
State v. Corpening, 2019-Ohio-4833.
State v. Breneman, 2012-Ohio-2534.
State v. Hopkins, 2018-Ohio-1340.
State v. Lumpkin, 2013-Ohio-3105.
Ohio v. Nash, 2011-Ohio-6548.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(d): 11 cases
State v. Martinez, 2012-Ohio-3750.
State v. Osler, 2011-Ohio-3219.
State v. King, 2011-Ohio-3323.
State v. Lanier, 2022-Ohio-2024.
State v. Lanier, 2023-Ohio-3088.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(e): 16 cases
State v. Brown, 2023-Ohio-3906.
State v. Polite, 2018-Ohio-1372.
State v. Collins, 2020-Ohio-3356, 155 N.E.3d 232.
State v. Smith, 2011-Ohio-6872.
State v. Deresse, 2014-Ohio-4234.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(f): 13 cases
State v. Church, 2018-Ohio-368.
State v. Miller, 2024-Ohio-4520.
State v. Martin, 2020-Ohio-3579.
State v. Curtis, 2023-Ohio-1652.
State v. Coleman, 2012-Ohio-2847.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(5)(A): 1 case
State v. Edwards, 2021-Ohio-1917.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(5)(a): 1 case
State v. Saylor, 2019-Ohio-1025.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(5)(b): 1 case
State v. Laubacher, 2019-Ohio-4271.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(6): 7 cases
State v. Rastbichler, 2014-Ohio-628.
State v. Bertuzzi, 2014-Ohio-5093.
State v. Smale, 2018-Ohio-5218.
State v. Consilio, 2017-Ohio-7913.
State v. Drake, 2011-Ohio-3042.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(6)(E): 1 case
State v. Keefer, 2019-Ohio-2419, 138 N.E.3d 519.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(6)(a): 21 cases
State v. Prince, 2012-Ohio-4111.
State v. Brunner, 2017-Ohio-2618.
State v. Swonger, 2019-Ohio-4606.
State v. Hagan, 2014-Ohio-4308.
State v. Little, 2011-Ohio-4256.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(6)(b): 10 cases
State v. Thompson, 2016-Ohio-8401.
State v. Jones, 2017-Ohio-251.
State v. Ahmad, 2018-Ohio-3556.
State v. Ahmad, 2017-Ohio-6991.
State v. Wright, 2016-Ohio-7795.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(6)(c): 9 cases
State v. Sipperley, 2020-Ohio-4609.
State v. Brown, 2022-Ohio-893.
State v. McKenzie, 2012-Ohio-6117.
State v. Stroughter, 2012-Ohio-1504.
State v. McClendon, 2012-Ohio-1410.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(6)(d): 12 cases
State v. Fisher, 2016-Ohio-4750.
State v. Farrow, 2023-Ohio-682, 209 N.E.3d 830.
State v. Chapman, 2019-Ohio-3339.
State v. Collins, 2020-Ohio-3356, 155 N.E.3d 232.
State v. Butcher, 2017-Ohio-4154.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(6)(e): 11 cases
State v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-1444, 110 N.E.3d 944.
State v. Evans, 2023-Ohio-4838.
State v. Aslinger, 2012-Ohio-5436.
State v. Martin, 2020-Ohio-3579.
State v. Hackathorn, 2022-Ohio-1612.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(6)(f): 7 cases
State v. Robinson, 2016-Ohio-905.
State v. Rodriguez, 2014-Ohio-2583.
State v. Hill, 2021-Ohio-1946.
Hill, No. 5:25-cv-00646 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 5, 2026).
State v. Garland, 2021-Ohio-1805.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(7)(c): 1 case
State v. Double, 2021-Ohio-632, 168 N.E.3d 899.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(7)(e): 2 cases
State v. Laubacher, 2019-Ohio-4271.
State v. Lewis, 2018-Ohio-3681.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(a)(a): 1 case
State v. Carpenter, 2020-Ohio-2791.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(a)(c): 1 case
State v. Montgomery, 2011-Ohio-1881.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(d): 1 case
State v. Howard, 2018-Ohio-648, 106 N.E.3d 842.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(l)(c): 1 case
State v. Jackson, 812 N.E.2d 1002 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 2004).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(c): 1 case
State v. Hardy, 2021-Ohio-2977.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(c)(1): 1 case
State v. Sabo, 2010-Ohio-1261.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(c)(11): 1 case
State v. Stuart, 2025-Ohio-2420.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(c)(3): 1 case
State v. Bethel, 2011-Ohio-3020.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(c)(4)(a): 1 case
State v. Stuart, 2025-Ohio-2420.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(c)(4)(b): 1 case
State v. McRae, 2011-Ohio-6157.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(A)(c)(4)(c): 2 cases
State v. Adams, 2015-Ohio-5072.
State v. Fields, 2016-Ohio-3127.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B): 7 cases
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Collier, 581 N.E.2d 552 (Ohio 1991). “The issue presented for our review is whether R.C. 2925.11 is unconstitutionally void for vagueness.”
Miamisburg v. Hanson, 2016-Ohio-964, 49 N.E.3d 336.
State v. Miller, 2019-Ohio-3294, 141 N.E.3d 604.
State v. Scott, 2014-Ohio-456.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(1): 2 cases
State v. Singh, 813 N.E.2d 12 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2004).
State v. Smith, 2017-Ohio-8657.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(1)(b): 1 case
State v. Jones, 684 N.E.2d 1304 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 1996).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(1)(d): 1 case
Stanford v. Northmont City Schs., No. 3:19-cv-00399 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 8, 2023).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2): 9 cases
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
State v. Ruley, 2018-Ohio-3201.
Akron v. Pari, 2019-Ohio-1083.
State v. Miller, 2019-Ohio-3294, 141 N.E.3d 604.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(a): 3 cases
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Ruley, 2018-Ohio-3201.
State v. Hagen, 2018-Ohio-4045.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(a)(iv): 9 cases
City of Akron v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-4500, 122 N.E.3d 672. “Brown argues that the trial court erred by applying a narrow interpretation of the immunity provision of R.C. 2925.11 and in concluding that Ms. Brown was not entitled to immunity for the offenses charged as a result of her overdose.”
State v. Miller, 2019-Ohio-3294, 141 N.E.3d 604.
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
State v. Allen, 2022-Ohio-1419, 188 N.E.3d 688.
State v. Hewitt, 2019-Ohio-5011.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(a)(ix): 1 case
State v. Craciun, 2018-Ohio-5185.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(a)(viii): 11 cases
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
State v. Hagen, 2018-Ohio-4045.
State v. Vineyard, 2018-Ohio-705, 106 N.E.3d 780.
State v. Sieminski, 2017-Ohio-5480, 92 N.E.3d 1252.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(b): 17 cases
City of Akron v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-4500, 122 N.E.3d 672. “Brown argues that the trial court erred by applying a narrow interpretation of the immunity provision of R.C. 2925.11 and in concluding that Ms. Brown was not entitled to immunity for the offenses charged as a result of her overdose.”
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
State v. Ruley, 2018-Ohio-3201.
State v. Miller, 2019-Ohio-3294, 141 N.E.3d 604.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(b)(i): 7 cases
State v. Miller, 2019-Ohio-3294, 141 N.E.3d 604.
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
City of Akron v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-4500, 122 N.E.3d 672. “Brown argues that the trial court erred by applying a narrow interpretation of the immunity provision of R.C. 2925.11 and in concluding that Ms. Brown was not entitled to immunity for the offenses charged as a result of her overdose.”
State v. Ruley, 2018-Ohio-3201.
State v. Hagen, 2018-Ohio-4045.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(b)(ii): 5 cases
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
State v. Ruley, 2018-Ohio-3201.
State v. Hagen, 2018-Ohio-4045.
State v. Craciun, 2018-Ohio-5185.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(b)(iii): 3 cases
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Craciun, 2018-Ohio-5185.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(e): 3 cases
City of Akron v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-4500, 122 N.E.3d 672. “Brown argues that the trial court erred by applying a narrow interpretation of the immunity provision of R.C. 2925.11 and in concluding that Ms. Brown was not entitled to immunity for the offenses charged as a result of her overdose.”
Akron v. Pari, 2019-Ohio-1083.
Akron v. J.B., 2019-Ohio-2203.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(e)(1): 1 case
State v. Miller, 2019-Ohio-3294, 141 N.E.3d 604.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(e)(i): 3 cases
City of Akron v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-4500, 122 N.E.3d 672. “Brown argues that the trial court erred by applying a narrow interpretation of the immunity provision of R.C. 2925.11 and in concluding that Ms. Brown was not entitled to immunity for the offenses charged as a result of her overdose.”
Akron v. Pari, 2019-Ohio-1083.
Akron v. J.B., 2019-Ohio-2203.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(f): 2 cases
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(g): 1 case
State v. Melms, 2018-Ohio-1947, 101 N.E.3d 747. “03 of the Revised Code shall receive training in informing individuals who call about an apparent drug overdose about the immunity from prosecution for a minor drug possession offense created by section 2925.11 of the Revised Code. (B) Public safety answering point personnel who…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(2)(ii): 1 case
State v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2267, 114 N.E.3d 228. “" {¶ 2} On May 27, 2016, a Ross County Grand Jury returned an indictment that charged appellant with fifth-degree felony cocaine-possession, in violation of R.C. 2925.11. In September 2016, the General Assembly amended the drug-possession statute, R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(B)(4): 4 cases
Miamisburg v. Hanson, 2016-Ohio-964, 49 N.E.3d 336.
State v. Skorvanek, 914 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2009).
State v. Tuleta, 2011-Ohio-1923.
Tuleta v. Med. Mut. of Ohio, 2014-Ohio-930.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C): 25 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Parra, 2011-Ohio-3977.
State v. Foreman (Slip Opinion), 2021-Ohio-3409, 184 N.E.3d 70.
State v. Ruby, 778 N.E.2d 101 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2002).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(1): 50 cases
In re A.J., 2016-Ohio-8196, 69 N.E.3d 733.
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Woodard, 2017-Ohio-6941. “This court and many others have held that the simultaneous possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses that do not merge as allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2925.11. See, e.g., State v. Graves, 12th Dist.”
State v. Delfino, 490 N.E.2d 884 (Ohio 1986).
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(1)(A): 1 case
State v. Ashcraft, 2021-Ohio-3897.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(1)(B): 1 case
State v. Scott, 2025-Ohio-1572.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(1)(a): 45 cases
State v. Woodard, 2017-Ohio-6941. “This court and many others have held that the simultaneous possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses that do not merge as allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2925.11. See, e.g., State v. Graves, 12th Dist.”
State v. Huber, 2011-Ohio-6175.
State v. Graves, 2015-Ohio-3936.
State v. Feagin, 2025-Ohio-665.
State v. Skorvanek, 914 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2009).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(1)(b): 29 cases
State v. Lark, 2018-Ohio-4940.
State v. Jones, 2024-Ohio-2959, 249 N.E.3d 782.
State v. Minyoung, 2012-Ohio-411.
State v. Owens, 2019-Ohio-2206.
State v. Helmick, 2014-Ohio-4187.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(1)(c): 43 cases
State v. Lee, 2021-Ohio-2544.
State v. Skorvanek, 914 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2009).
State v. Fletcher, 2017-Ohio-1006.
State v. Dukes, 2017-Ohio-7204.
State v. Scoggins, 2017-Ohio-8989.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(1)(d): 8 cases
State v. Alexander, 2022-Ohio-1812, 190 N.E.3d 651.
State v. Smith, 2017-Ohio-2616.
State v. Webb, 2018-Ohio-4199.
State v. Basford, 2021-Ohio-161.
State v. Yoakem, 2016-Ohio-745.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(1)(e): 13 cases
State v. Elkins, 773 N.E.2d 593 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 2002).
State v. Scoggins, 2017-Ohio-8989.
State v. Samatar, 787 N.E.2d 691 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 2003).
State v. Nevarez-Reyes, 2017-Ohio-2610.
State v. Jenkins, 2018-Ohio-4814.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(11): 4 cases
State v. Daniels, 2020-Ohio-1176.
State v. Folk, 2020-Ohio-4373.
State v. Harris, 2021-Ohio-2639.
State v. Tingler, 2023-Ohio-834.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(11)(a): 7 cases
State v. Scott, 2025-Ohio-806.
State v. Garcia, 2024-Ohio-1509.
State v. Saurber, 2021-Ohio-464.
State v. Kern, 2024-Ohio-5976.
State v. Mason, 2026-Ohio-2039.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(11)(b): 4 cases
State v. Scott, 2025-Ohio-806.
Cameron D. Williams v. Shelbie Smith, No. 2:25-cv-00283 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2026).
State v. Daniels, 2024-Ohio-5416.
State v. Stallworth, 2026-Ohio-2242.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(11)(c): 6 cases
State v. Scott, 2025-Ohio-806.
State v. Griffin, 2020-Ohio-2936, 164 N.E.3d 1032.
State v. Foster, 2025-Ohio-2942.
State v. Fulton, 2024-Ohio-671, 236 N.E.3d 897.
State v. Monegan, 2023-Ohio-2130, 218 N.E.3d 1110.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(11)(d): 1 case
State v. Letts, 2020-Ohio-6643.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(11)(e): 6 cases
State v. Rentschler, 2023-Ohio-3009, 223 N.E.3d 957.
State v. Tolbert, 2022-Ohio-1159.
State v. Davis, 2025-Ohio-421.
State v. Figueroa-Benitez, 2025-Ohio-1146.
State v. Brooks, 2026-Ohio-224.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(11)(g): 5 cases
State v. Figueroa-Benitez, 2025-Ohio-1146.
State v. Joseph, 2022-Ohio-4404.
State v. Lloyd, 2025-Ohio-2764.
State v. Matos, 2024-Ohio-5864.
State v. Brooks, 2026-Ohio-224.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(2): 20 cases
State v. Eafford, 2012-Ohio-2224, 132 Ohio St. 3d 159. “{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals vacating Donald Eafford’s felony sentence for possession of cocaine and holding that Eafford was convicted only of misdemeanor possession of drugs because the jury-verdict form did not state…”
State v. Delfino, 490 N.E.2d 884 (Ohio 1986).
State v. Henry, 2016-Ohio-680.
State v. Brown, 2011-Ohio-1461.
State v. Kendall, 2012-Ohio-1172.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(2)(a): 16 cases
State v. Eafford, 2012-Ohio-2224, 132 Ohio St. 3d 159. “{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals vacating Donald Eafford’s felony sentence for possession of cocaine and holding that Eafford was convicted only of misdemeanor possession of drugs because the jury-verdict form did not state…”
State v. Feagin, 2025-Ohio-665.
State v. Klosterman, 2016-Ohio-232.
State v. Henry, 2016-Ohio-680.
State v. Moore, 2019-Ohio-1872.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(2)(b): 3 cases
State v. Kremer, 2018-Ohio-3339.
State v. Adkins, 737 N.E.2d 1021 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 2000).
State v. Howard, 2016-Ohio-7125.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3): 55 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Pariag, 2013-Ohio-4010, 998 N.E.2d 401.
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Jamison, 2016-Ohio-5122.
State v. Delfino, 490 N.E.2d 884 (Ohio 1986).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3)(C): 1 case
State v. Carter, 2023-Ohio-3452.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3)(a): 39 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Young, 765 N.E.2d 938 (Ohio Ct. App. 11th Dist. 2001).
State v. Day, 2019-Ohio-4816, 149 N.E.3d 122.
State v. Hall, 2016-Ohio-5787.
State v. Jamison, 2016-Ohio-5122.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3)(b): 6 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Lindow, 2016-Ohio-913.
State v. Helmick, 2014-Ohio-4187.
State v. Mitchell, 2023-Ohio-724.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3)(c): 7 cases
State v. Adkins, 829 N.E.2d 729 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2005).
State v. Hunter, 2011-Ohio-6321.
State v. Reye, 2016-Ohio-3495.
State v. Mitchell, 2023-Ohio-724.
State v. Green, 2014-Ohio-2305.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3)(d): 8 cases
State v. Adkins, 737 N.E.2d 1021 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 2000).
State v. Palmer, 2017-Ohio-2639.
State v. Kegley, 2018-Ohio-4167.
State v. Kegley, 2016-Ohio-8467.
State v. Kegley, 2016-Ohio-2983.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3)(e): 3 cases
State v. Benvenuto, 2018-Ohio-2242.
State v. Murnahan, 2018-Ohio-4762.
State v. Myers, 757 N.E.2d 1258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2001).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3)(f): 7 cases
State v. Gonzales, 783 N.E.2d 903 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2002).
State v. Graham, 2014-Ohio-1891.
State v. Johnson, 747 N.E.2d 863 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2000).
State v. Stevens, 2017-Ohio-8692.
State v. Lask, 2019-Ohio-2753.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(3)(g): 2 cases
State v. Fester, 2021-Ohio-410, 167 N.E.3d 1021.
State v. Lask, 2019-Ohio-2753.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4): 72 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Eafford, 2012-Ohio-2224, 132 Ohio St. 3d 159. “{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals vacating Donald Eafford’s felony sentence for possession of cocaine and holding that Eafford was convicted only of misdemeanor possession of drugs because the jury-verdict form did not state…”
State v. Jackson, 2016-Ohio-7637.
State v. Jordan, 817 N.E.2d 864 (Ohio 2004).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(3): 2 cases
State v. Ware (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-5201, 22 N.E.3d 1082.
State v. Long, 2016-Ohio-5882.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(A): 1 case
State v. Horton, 2016-Ohio-8181.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(D): 1 case
State v. Thompson, 2020-Ohio-723.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(F): 2 cases
State v. Atkinson, 2020-Ohio-3522.
State v. Hollie, 2024-Ohio-2096.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(a): 47 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Foster, 845 N.E.2d 470 (Ohio 2006).
State v. Gonzales, 2015-Ohio-461.
State v. Eafford, 2012-Ohio-2224, 132 Ohio St. 3d 159. “{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals vacating Donald Eafford’s felony sentence for possession of cocaine and holding that Eafford was convicted only of misdemeanor possession of drugs because the jury-verdict form did not state…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(b): 50 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Woodard, 2017-Ohio-6941. “This court and many others have held that the simultaneous possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses that do not merge as allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2925.11. See, e.g., State v. Graves, 12th Dist.”
State v. Weaver, 751 N.E.2d 1096 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2001).
State v. Terrell, 2017-Ohio-7097, 95 N.E.3d 870.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(c): 12 cases
State v. Limoli (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-3072, 16 N.E.3d 641.
State v. Grier, 2011-Ohio-902.
State v. Arnold, 2012-Ohio-5786.
State v. Hayes, 2025-Ohio-4603.
State v. Bush, 2018-Ohio-5272.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(d): 9 cases
State v. Taylor, 113 Ohio St. 3d 297 (2007).
State v. Liddy, 2022-Ohio-4282, 202 N.E.3d 172.
State v. Johnson, 2023-Ohio-2979.
State v. King, 809 N.E.2d 71 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 2004).
State v. Carroll, 2016-Ohio-374, 47 N.E.3d 198.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(e): 27 cases
State v. Taylor, 113 Ohio St. 3d 297 (2007).
State v. Hudson, 2018-Ohio-133, 104 N.E.3d 25.
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Terrell, 2017-Ohio-7097, 95 N.E.3d 870.
State v. Watkins, 2021-Ohio-163.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(f): 34 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-8319, 150 Ohio St. 3d 261. “11(C)(4) {¶ 11} Gonzales was convicted of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11, which provides: (A) No person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog.”
State v. Gonzales, 2015-Ohio-461.
State v. Atkinson, 2020-Ohio-3522.
State v. Terrell, 2017-Ohio-7097, 95 N.E.3d 870.
State v. Gonzales, 783 N.E.2d 903 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2002).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(4)(g): 1 case
State v. Makin, 2017-Ohio-2649.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(5): 1 case
State v. Hottenstein, 2015-Ohio-4787, 43 N.E.3d 463.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(6): 15 cases
State v. Woodard, 2017-Ohio-6941. “This court and many others have held that the simultaneous possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses that do not merge as allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2925.11. See, e.g., State v. Graves, 12th Dist.”
State v. Seith, 2016-Ohio-8302.
State v. Neville, 2019-Ohio-151, 128 N.E.3d 937.
State v. Gartrell, 2014-Ohio-5203.
State v. Higgins, 2018-Ohio-476, 105 N.E.3d 665.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(6)(a): 10 cases
State v. Woodard, 2017-Ohio-6941. “This court and many others have held that the simultaneous possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses that do not merge as allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2925.11. See, e.g., State v. Graves, 12th Dist.”
State v. Carpenter, 2019-Ohio-58, 128 N.E.3d 857.
State v. Rastbichler, 2014-Ohio-628.
State v. Pierce, 709 N.E.2d 203 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1998).
State v. Barnett, 2018-Ohio-2486, 114 N.E.3d 773.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(6)(b): 7 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Jones, 2017-Ohio-251.
State v. Waver, 2016-Ohio-5092.
State v. Stoffer, 2015-Ohio-352.
State v. Holt, 2010-Ohio-2298.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(6)(c): 3 cases
State v. Jackson, 2018-Ohio-1285.
State v. Verity, 2013-Ohio-1158.
State v. Stroughter, 2012-Ohio-1504.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(6)(d): 16 cases
State v. Wilson, 2018-Ohio-396, 106 N.E.3d 806.
State v. Koon, 2016-Ohio-416.
State v. Stoffer, 2015-Ohio-352.
State v. Graves, 2015-Ohio-3936.
State v. Gartrell, 2014-Ohio-5203.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(6)(e): 5 cases
State v. Tutt, 2015-Ohio-5145, 54 N.E.3d 619.
State v. Granados, 2014-Ohio-1758.
State v. Jones, 2011-Ohio-4934.
State v. McGowan, 2015-Ohio-3429.
State v. Stacy, 2020-Ohio-536.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(6)(f): 7 cases
State v. Hill, 2022-Ohio-4544, 218 N.E.3d 891.
State v. Barnes, 2020-Ohio-3943.
State v. Saxton, 2019-Ohio-5257.
State v. Heald, 2018-Ohio-1789.
State v. Edwards, 2022-Ohio-1725.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(7): 4 cases
State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion), 2017-Ohio-777, 150 Ohio St. 3d 276. “68(C) (“Any industrial process involving the use of lead or its preparations or compounds”) and (D) (“Any industrial process involving the use of mercury or its preparations or compounds”); R.C.”
State v. Hottenstein, 2015-Ohio-4787, 43 N.E.3d 463.
Benvenuto v. Turner, No. 3:19-cv-02353, 2023 WL 2711293 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 30, 2023).
State v. Capone, 2023-Ohio-3513.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(8): 3 cases
State v. Holloway, 2018-Ohio-4636.
State v. Ridley, 2020-Ohio-402.
State v. Smith, 2014-Ohio-5303.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(8)(e): 1 case
State v. Myers, 757 N.E.2d 1258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2001).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(9): 1 case
State v. Williams, 2025-Ohio-5309.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(9)(a): 3 cases
State v. Williams, 2025-Ohio-5309.
State v. Joseph, 2022-Ohio-4404.
State v. Figueroa-Benitez, 2025-Ohio-1146.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(9)(b): 1 case
State v. Joseph, 2022-Ohio-4404.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(C)(b): 1 case
State v. Hottenstein, 2015-Ohio-4787, 43 N.E.3d 463.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(CX1): 1 case
State v. Montgomery, 5 Ohio App. Unrep. 290 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1990).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(D): 6 cases
State v. Weber, 484 N.E.2d 207 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1984).
State v. Robinson, 931 N.E.2d 1110 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2010).
State v. Robinson, 659 N.E.2d 1292 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1995).
City of Niles v. Howard, 466 N.E.2d 539 (Ohio 1984).
United States v. Randall Stubblefield, Jr., 265 F.3d 345 (6th Cir. 2001).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(E): 13 cases
State v. Gipson, 687 N.E.2d 750 (Ohio 1998). “Chapter 2925 provide for the imposition of mandatory fines for certain drug-related offenses, including certain drug abuse offenses in violation of R.C. 2925.11, and refer to a specific statutory procedure by which an offender who is both indigent and unable to pay may avoid…”
State v. Moore, 2012-Ohio-5479, 985 N.E.2d 432.
State v. Wheeler, 2016-Ohio-2964. “11(E) and (E)(2) demonstrates that the ‘in addition to’ introductory phrases to R.C. 2925.11 do not act to limit the license suspension provisions of R.”
State v. Gipson, 80 Ohio St. 3d 626 (1998). “In December 1994, Gipson was indicted by the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury for possession of cocaine (in less than the bulk amount), a drug of abuse, in violation of former R.C. 2925.11 (145 Ohio Laws, Part III, 5781).”
State v. Fields, 918 N.E.2d 204 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2009).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(E)(1): 4 cases
State v. Gipson, 80 Ohio St. 3d 626 (1998). “In December 1994, Gipson was indicted by the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury for possession of cocaine (in less than the bulk amount), a drug of abuse, in violation of former R.C. 2925.11 (145 Ohio Laws, Part III, 5781).”
State v. Boone, 670 N.E.2d 527 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1995).
State v. Laubacher, 2019-Ohio-4271.
State v. Sherman, 2013-Ohio-2136.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(E)(1)(a): 14 cases
State v. Moore, 2012-Ohio-5479, 985 N.E.2d 432.
State v. Gipson, 687 N.E.2d 750 (Ohio 1998). “Chapter 2925 provide for the imposition of mandatory fines for certain drug-related offenses, including certain drug abuse offenses in violation of R.C. 2925.11, and refer to a specific statutory procedure by which an offender who is both indigent and unable to pay may avoid…”
State v. Gipson, 80 Ohio St. 3d 626 (1998). “In December 1994, Gipson was indicted by the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury for possession of cocaine (in less than the bulk amount), a drug of abuse, in violation of former R.C. 2925.11 (145 Ohio Laws, Part III, 5781).”
State v. Gipson, 2022-Ohio-2069.
State v. Barker, 2014-Ohio-3946.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(E)(2): 9 cases
State v. Wheeler, 2016-Ohio-2964. “11(E) and (E)(2) demonstrates that the ‘in addition to’ introductory phrases to R.C. 2925.11 do not act to limit the license suspension provisions of R.”
State v. Woods, 2013-Ohio-1136.
State v. Brooks, 2017-Ohio-5620.
State v. Rusu, 2012-Ohio-2613.
State v. Marcum, 2015-Ohio-5237, 54 N.E.3d 719.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(E)(5): 6 cases
State v. Gipson, 687 N.E.2d 750 (Ohio 1998). “Chapter 2925 provide for the imposition of mandatory fines for certain drug-related offenses, including certain drug abuse offenses in violation of R.C. 2925.11, and refer to a specific statutory procedure by which an offender who is both indigent and unable to pay may avoid…”
State v. Gipson, 80 Ohio St. 3d 626 (1998). “In December 1994, Gipson was indicted by the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury for possession of cocaine (in less than the bulk amount), a drug of abuse, in violation of former R.C. 2925.11 (145 Ohio Laws, Part III, 5781).”
State v. Kobi, 701 N.E.2d 420 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 1997).
State v. White, 2013-Ohio-2058.
State v. Gutierrez, 642 N.E.2d 674 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 1994).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(F): 4 cases
State v. Rose, 759 N.E.2d 460 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2001).
State v. Wheeler, 2016-Ohio-2964. “11(E) and (E)(2) demonstrates that the ‘in addition to’ introductory phrases to R.C. 2925.11 do not act to limit the license suspension provisions of R.”
United States v. Fernando Godinez, 955 F.3d 651 (7th Cir. 2020).
United States v. Fernando Godinez, No. 19-1215 (7th Cir. Apr. 9, 2020).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(F)(1): 9 cases
State v. Thompkins, 664 N.E.2d 926 (Ohio 1996).
State v. Gipson, 80 Ohio St. 3d 626 (1998). “In December 1994, Gipson was indicted by the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury for possession of cocaine (in less than the bulk amount), a drug of abuse, in violation of former R.C. 2925.11 (145 Ohio Laws, Part III, 5781).”
State v. Thompkins, 75 Ohio St. 3d 558 (1996).
State v. Smith, 682 N.E.2d 15 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1996).
State v. Gamble, 669 N.E.2d 57 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1995).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(H): 1 case
State v. Cole, 641 N.E.2d 732 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1994).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(II): 3 cases
State v. Phifer, 2021-Ohio-521.
State v. Sparks, 2020-Ohio-4930.
State v. Spivery, 2023-Ohio-1603.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(a): 5 cases
United States v. Luis A. Montanez, 442 F.3d 485 (6th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Franks, 98 F. App'x 483 (6th Cir. 2004).
State v. Maynard, 2025-Ohio-4943.
State v. Crum, 2025-Ohio-4443.
United States v. Montanez, No. 04-4543 (6th Cir. Mar. 23, 2006).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(a)(c)(2)(A): 1 case
State v. Robinson, 2020-Ohio-4496.
Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11(c)(3): 1 case
Joslin v. 14th Dist. Judge, 255 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.