Ohio Revised Code
Ohio Rev. Code § 2931.31 (2026)
Change of venue - costs and expenses
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The reasonable expenses of the officer acting as prosecutor, incurred inconsequence of a change of venue under section 2901.12 of the Revised Code, the fees of the clerk of the court to which the venue is changed, the sheriff or bailiff, and of the jury shall be allowed and paid out of the treasury of the county in which said cause originated.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case: State v. Armstrong, 2017-Ohio-8715.
State v. Armstrong, 2017-Ohio-8715. “{¶ 4} On May 2, 2016, appellant entered an "Alford" plea of guilty to one count of forgery, in violation of R.C. 2931.31(A), a felony of the fifth degree.”
State v. Lewis, 2016-Ohio-7632. “See R.C. 2931.31(C)(1). Thus, a higher value of counterfeit currency may result in a higher-level offense.”
State v. Johnson, 2020-Ohio-2742, 154 N.E.3d 387. “31(A) defines the offense of obstructing official business as follows: No person, without privilege to do so and with purpose to prevent, obstruct, or delay the performance by a public official of any authorized act within the public official’s official capacity, shall do any…”
State v. Conkle, 2019-Ohio-4242. “11(A), see also R.C 2931.31(A). Ms. Conkle challenges the State’s production of evidence as to two elements of obstructing official business: (1) that officers were in the performance of their lawful duties, and (2) that she acted without privilege.”
State v. Harrell, 2026-Ohio-54. “13, 1998); R.C. 2931.31(E). “The state simply must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s uncharged conduct violated a statute and that the statutory violation was a ‘corrupt activity.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2931.31(A): 3 cases
State v. Armstrong, 2017-Ohio-8715. “{¶ 4} On May 2, 2016, appellant entered an "Alford" plea of guilty to one count of forgery, in violation of R.C. 2931.31(A), a felony of the fifth degree.”
State v. Johnson, 2020-Ohio-2742, 154 N.E.3d 387. “31(A) defines the offense of obstructing official business as follows: No person, without privilege to do so and with purpose to prevent, obstruct, or delay the performance by a public official of any authorized act within the public official’s official capacity, shall do any…”
State v. Conkle, 2019-Ohio-4242. “11(A), see also R.C 2931.31(A). Ms. Conkle challenges the State’s production of evidence as to two elements of obstructing official business: (1) that officers were in the performance of their lawful duties, and (2) that she acted without privilege.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2931.31(C)(1): 1 case
State v. Lewis, 2016-Ohio-7632. “See R.C. 2931.31(C)(1). Thus, a higher value of counterfeit currency may result in a higher-level offense.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2931.31(E): 1 case
State v. Harrell, 2026-Ohio-54. “13, 1998); R.C. 2931.31(E). “The state simply must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s uncharged conduct violated a statute and that the statutory violation was a ‘corrupt activity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.