(A) A warrant of search or seizure shall issue only upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation particularly describing the place to be searched and the property and things to be seized.
(B) A warrant of search to conduct an inspection of property shall issue only upon probable cause to believe that conditions exist upon such property which are or may become hazardous to the public health, safety, or welfare.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1957–2025 · leading case: State v. Neil, 2016-Ohio-4762.
State v. Neil, 2016-Ohio-4762. “rth Amendment to the United States Constitution, applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no…”
State v. Wintermeyer, 2017-Ohio-5521, 93 N.E.3d 397. · cites it 2דSee also R.C. 2933.22(A) and Crim.R. 41(C). {¶ 14} Historically, the protections afforded by Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution have been construed as coextensive with the protections of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
State v. Phillips, 2016-Ohio-5944. “See also R.C. 2933.22(A); Crim.R. 41(C). Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution provides: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and possessions, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue,…”
State v. Scarberry, 2016-Ohio-7065, 72 N.E.3d 173. “See also R.C. 2933.22(A), and Crim.R. 41(C). {¶ 16} Historically, the protections afforded by Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution have been construed as coextensive with the protections of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
State v. Beasley, 2019-Ohio-719. “See also R.C. 2933.22(A) and Crim.R. 41(C). {¶ 39} Historically, the protections afforded by Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution have been construed as coextensive with the protections of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
State v. Johnson, 2014-Ohio-671. “See also R.C. 2933.22(A); Crim.R. 41(C). {¶ 8} When determining whether an affidavit in support of a search warrant demonstrates probable cause, a magistrate must " 'make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before…”
State v. Taylor, 612 N.E.2d 728 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1992). “” Taylor argues that the affidavit in support of the application for the search warrant did not satisfy the probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, R.C. 2933.22, and Crim.R. 41. He…”
State v. Morales, 2018-Ohio-3687, 118 N.E.3d 1183. “Constitution, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon…”
State v. Smith, 544 N.E.2d 239 (Ohio 1989). “See, also, R.C. 2933.22. Into these provisions were poured the living and sometimes bitter experiences of our forefathers struggling for independence from an unyielding and unfeeling despot.”
State v. Jacob, 924 N.E.2d 410 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2009). “R.C. 2933.22(A) similarly provides that “[a] warrant of search or seizure shall issue only upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation particularly describing the place to be searched and the property and things to be seized.”
State v. Clouser, 2016-Ohio-5370. “Constitution, applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon…”
State ex rel. Eaton v. Price, 152 N.E.2d 776 (Ohio Ct. App. 1957). · cites it 2דSection 2933.22, Revised Code, provides: “A warrant of search or seizure shall issue only upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation particularly de *388 scribing the place to be searched and the property and things to be seized.”
State v. Neil, 2016-Ohio-4762. “rth Amendment to the United States Constitution, applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no…”
State v. Wintermeyer, 2017-Ohio-5521, 93 N.E.3d 397. “See also R.C. 2933.22(A) and Crim.R. 41(C). {¶ 14} Historically, the protections afforded by Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution have been construed as coextensive with the protections of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
State v. Phillips, 2016-Ohio-5944. “See also R.C. 2933.22(A); Crim.R. 41(C). Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution provides: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and possessions, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue,…”
State v. Scarberry, 2016-Ohio-7065, 72 N.E.3d 173. “See also R.C. 2933.22(A), and Crim.R. 41(C). {¶ 16} Historically, the protections afforded by Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution have been construed as coextensive with the protections of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
State v. Beasley, 2019-Ohio-719. “See also R.C. 2933.22(A) and Crim.R. 41(C). {¶ 39} Historically, the protections afforded by Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution have been construed as coextensive with the protections of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.