When a warrant is executed by the seizure of property or things described therein, such property or things shall be kept by the judge, clerk, or magistrate to be used as evidence.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1960–2024 · leading case: Miller v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol, 2020 Ohio 3231 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
Miller v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol, 2020 Ohio 3231 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 4דMiller asserts that R.C. 2933.26 and State v. Jacobs, 137 Ohio St.”
State v. Simpson, 2023 Ohio 3207 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “Without speculating on the origin of this language in the search warrant, we note that R.C. 2933.26 requires that, “[w]hen a warrant is executed by the seizure of property or things described therein, such property or things shall be kept by the judge, clerk, or magistrate to be…”
State v. Johnson, 165 N.E.2d 814 (Ohio Ct. App. 1960). “Defendant’s third assignment of error claims the inadmissibility in evidence of exhibits one through six, inclusive, because they were in the possession of the police from the time of the respective offenses until the trial therefor, and he cites §2933.26 R. C., in support of…”
State ex rel. Gains v. Go Go Girls Cabaret, Inc., 932 N.E.2d 353 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). “See also R.C. 2933.26 (“When a warrant is executed by the seizure of property or things described therein, such property or things shall be kept by the judge, clerk, or magistrate to be used as evidence”).”
State v. Hagan, 2014 Ohio 4308 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “” R.C. 2933.26. {¶17} At the preliminary hearing, the state advised the trial judge that Hagan had a pending case in the court of common pleas when she was stopped for this incident.”
State v. Moreno, 2017 Ohio 479 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “41(D)(1); see also R.C. 2933.26 (property seized -7- to be kept by court) and R.”
Glass v. Delaware Cty. Sheriff's Off., 2024 Ohio 1301 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “91-021, 1991 WL 576700 , Syllabus 5 (“Pursuant to R.C. 2933.26 and R.C. 2933.37, property seized by warrant shall be kept as evidence until the accused is tried or the claimant’s right to the property is otherwise ascertained by the court that issued the warrant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.