Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2935.031 (2026)

Motor vehicle pursuit policy

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) As used in this section, "law enforcement entity" means an agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision of the state that employs a sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable, marshal, deputy marshal, police officer, member of a metropolitan housing authority police force, state university law enforcement officer, or veterans' home police officer with arrest authority under section 2935.03 of the Revised Code or that employs other persons with arrest authority under the Revised Code.

(B) Each law enforcement entity shall adopt a written policy for the pursuit in a motor vehicle of any person who violates a law of this state or an ordinance of a municipal corporation. In developing its policy, each law enforcement entity shall consider pursuit policy standards and best-practice recommendations as established by the Ohio collaborative community-police advisory board or a similar law enforcement accrediting entity. The chief law enforcement officer or other chief official of the law enforcement entity shall formally advise and train each peace officer or other person with arrest authority the entity employs on each pursuit policy adopted by that entity pursuant to this section.

Last updated February 24, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2011 · leading case: Est. of Wagner v. Heavlin, 737 N.E.2d 989 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Est. of Wagner v. Heavlin, 737 N.E.2d 989 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 2000). · cites it 3× “In addition, we take note of R.C. 2935.031, which provides: “Any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision of the state that employs a sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable, marshal, deputy marshal, police officer, member of a metropolitan housing authority police force,…”
Adams v. Ward, 2010-Ohio-4851. · cites it 2× “¶{46} In support of her argument that Ward was not trained or inadequately trained, Adams cites to R.C. 2935.031. This section provides: ¶{47} “Any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision of the state that employs a sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable, marshal, deputy…”
DiGiorgio v. Cleveland, 2011-Ohio-5878. “3 Furthermore, although R.C. 2935.031 imposes a statutory duty upon a political subdivision to adopt a pursuit policy, it cannot be used as an independent basis for imposing liability.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.