Notes of Decisions
State v. Hope, 2019 Ohio 2174 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 3× “31(A) or R.C. 2945.171. Crim.R. 31(A) requires a verdict be unanimous, in writing, signed by all concurring jurors, and returned to the judge in open court.”
State v. Diar, 900 N.E.2d 565 (Ohio 2008).
“R.C. 2945.171 merely requires that “[i]n all criminal cases the verdict of the jury shall be in writing and signed by each of the jurors concurring therein.”
State v. Crumpton, 2024 Ohio 5064 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 3× “23CA4024 8 jurors concurring therein and that R.C. 2945.171 also requires a written verdict signed by all jurors concurring therein.”
State v. Villani, 2019 Ohio 1831 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶ 40} Pursuant to both R.C. 2945.171 and Crim.R. 31(A), a jury verdict must be in writing and signed by all the jurors.”
State v. Ellis, 2021 Ohio 1297 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
“R.C. 2945.171; Crim.R. 31. Further, R.C. 2945.”
State v. Sims, 2015 Ohio 4996 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
“at *8, relying on R.C. 2945.171 (“[i]n all criminal cases the verdict of the jury shall be in writing and signed by each of the jurors concurring therein”), Crim.”
State v. Harris, 2012 Ohio 1853 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 3× “Similarly, Harris contends that both the Termination Entry and the nunc pro tunc entry are invalid because the degree of the offense is not included for either count upon which he was convicted.”
State v. Ligon, 902 N.E.2d 1011 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).
“75(A)(2) and “verdict of the jury” as it appears in R.C. 2945.171 is a distinction without legal significance.”
State v. Carmack, 572 N.E.2d 794 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 3× “” *354 R.C. 2945.171 and 2945.77 provide similar requirements.”
State v. DiSabato, 2019 Ohio 3542 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 2× “II The trial court committed reversible error when it violated Ohio Criminal Rule 24, Ohio Criminal Rule 31, and R.C. §2945.171. -17- Case No. 14-18-23 {¶24} In his second assignment of error, DiSabato argues that the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to…”
State v. Oliver, 2021 Ohio 606 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
“” R.C. 2945.171 states that, “[i]n all criminal cases the verdict of the jury shall be in writing and signed by each of the jurors concurring therein.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.