Notes of Decisions
Cited in
46
cases (
12 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case:
State v. Velez, 2014 Ohio 1788 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Velez, 2014 Ohio 1788 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 3× “24(G) and R.C. 2945.29 address removal of jurors during criminal trials.”
State v. Henderson, 2020 Ohio 6 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 3× “24 or R.C. 2945.29. He also argues that a criminal defendant has a right pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment to be present at every “critical stage” of his trial.”
State v. Grate (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5584 (Ohio 2020).
“24(G) and R.C. 2945.29 govern the removal and replacement of jurors during criminal trials.”
State v. Jennings, 2017 Ohio 8224 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 4× “24(G) and R.C. 2945.29 govern the removal and replacement of jurors during criminal trials.”
State v. Lane, 2022 Ohio 3775 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 2× “24(G) and R.C. 2945.29 address removal of jurors during criminal trials.”
State v. Gross, 2002 Ohio 5524 (Ohio 2002).
“The federal rules mentioned above, at least as they relate to alternate jurors, address these special challenges, and Ohio should consider making similar revisions to our rules that implicate alternates, and to any related statutes, such as R.”
State v. Mock, 2010 Ohio 2747 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “24(G)(1) reads, “Alternate jurors in the order in which they are called shall replace jurors who, prior to the time the jury retires to consider its verdict, become or are found to be unable or disqualified to perform their duties.”
State v. Zaragoza, 2016 Ohio 144 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “24(G) and R.C. 2945.29 address removal of jurors during criminal trials.”
State v. Brown, 2012 Ohio 1848 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “24(F); see also R.C. 2945.29. Absent a record showing that the court abused that discretion which resulted in prejudice to the defense, the regularity of the proceedings is presumed.”
State v. Coleman, 525 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio 1988).
“The juror had been physically restrained from appearing at trial by her husband. The husband apparently did not approve of the juror’s sitting on the case.”
State v. Taylor, 2020 Ohio 3481 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 2× “24(G) and R.C. 2945.29 address removal of jurors during criminal trials.”
State v. Cunningham, 2012 Ohio 2794 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “24(G) and R.C. 2945.29 address removal of jurors during criminal trials.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2945.29(D)(1) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.