Notes of Decisions
Cited in
79
cases (
20 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case:
State v. Ellis, 2013 Ohio 1184 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State v. Ellis, 2013 Ohio 1184 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 4× “{¶42} R.C. 2947.06 permits a trial court to order a PSI or psychological report to aid the court in sentencing.”
McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183 (1971).
· cites it 4× “Moreover, Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2947.06 (Supp. 1970) expressly permits a trial court to "hear testimony of mitigation of a sentence at the term of conviction or plea.”
State v. Bayless, 357 N.E.2d 1035 (Ohio 1976).
· cites it 2× “reports submitted to the court, pursuant to Section 2947.06 of the Revised Code. Copies.”
State v. McAlpin, 2022 Ohio 1567 (Ohio 2022).
“” {¶ 281} At McAlpin’s request, the trial court referred him to the Court Psychiatric Clinic pursuant to R.C. 2947.06(B) for an evaluation of mitigating factors.”
John Glenn v. Arthur Tate, Jr., Warden, 71 F.3d 1204 (6th Cir. 1996).
· cites it 2× “Siddall, a psychologist, were appointed by the trial court to evaluate John Glenn under Ohio Rev.Code § 2947.06, the statute cited by the prosecution.”
State v. Hutton, 559 N.E.2d 432 (Ohio 1990).
· cites it 2× “*43 However, the statute requires that a PSI be made if the defendant requests it “pursuant to section 2947.06 of the Revised Code. * * *” R.”
State ex rel. Hunter v. Binette (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2681 (Ohio 2018).
· cites it 2× “8 alleges a violation of R.C. 2947.06(B), which concerns the appointment of psychologists and psychiatrists to assist the court at sentencing.”
State v. Reed, 2013 Ohio 3970 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 3× “This Court is permitted to review presentence investigation reports prepared pursuant to R.C. 2947.06. R.C. 2953.08(F)(1). {¶84} At sentencing, the trial court said that it had reviewed Reed’s prior presentence investigation report mainly for his background and criminal history,…”
State v. Gaspareno, 2016 Ohio 990 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “08, section 2947.06, or another section of the Revised Code.”
State v. Blankenburg, 966 N.E.2d 958 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
“09]; and fees of psychologists and psychiatrists [R.C. 2947.06]; etc. Id. (no statutory provision has been identified by the state as authorizing the towing and storage of the defendant’s vehicle to be assessed as costs in this proceeding, so consequently, trial court is without…”
State v. Williams, 490 N.E.2d 906 (Ohio 1986).
“” The appellant failed to exercise this right and cannot now be heard on a complaint that the admission of these reports, prepared at his own request, under R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2947.06(1996) — 1 case
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2947.06(A) — 2 cases
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2947.06(A)(1) — 12 cases
State v. Ellis, 2013 Ohio 1184 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
“{¶42} R.C. 2947.06 permits a trial court to order a PSI or psychological report to aid the court in sentencing.”
State v. Reed, 2013 Ohio 3970 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
“This Court is permitted to review presentence investigation reports prepared pursuant to R.C. 2947.06. R.C. 2953.08(F)(1). {¶84} At sentencing, the trial court said that it had reviewed Reed’s prior presentence investigation report mainly for his background and criminal history,…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2947.06(B) — 18 cases
State v. McAlpin, 2022 Ohio 1567 (Ohio 2022).
“” {¶ 281} At McAlpin’s request, the trial court referred him to the Court Psychiatric Clinic pursuant to R.C. 2947.06(B) for an evaluation of mitigating factors.”
State v. Ellis, 2013 Ohio 1184 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
“{¶42} R.C. 2947.06 permits a trial court to order a PSI or psychological report to aid the court in sentencing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.