Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2947
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2947.17 (2026)

Breach of condition of any recognizance

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 16, 1980
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 736 - 113th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

In case of a breach of the condition of any recognizance given under section 2947.16 of the Revised Code, the same proceedings shall be had as are prescribed in relation to forfeiture of other recognizances.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2014 · leading case: State v. Meyer, 706 N.E.2d 378 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Meyer, 706 N.E.2d 378 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1997). · cites it 2× “C-910620, unreported, 1992 WL 156122 , that R.C. 2947.17(A) requires a hearing whenever a fine is merely imposed.”
Mentor v. Meyers, 2014-Ohio-2011. “20543, 2005-Ohio-1595, ¶12 , quoting R.C. 2947.17(B). As the trial court never ordered appellant’s “unconstitutional arrest to debtor’s prison,” the trial court did not abuse its discretion.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2947.17(A): 1 case
State v. Meyer, 706 N.E.2d 378 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1997). “C-910620, unreported, 1992 WL 156122 , that R.C. 2947.17(A) requires a hearing whenever a fine is merely imposed.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 2947.17(B): 1 case
Mentor v. Meyers, 2014-Ohio-2011. “20543, 2005-Ohio-1595, ¶12 , quoting R.C. 2947.17(B). As the trial court never ordered appellant’s “unconstitutional arrest to debtor’s prison,” the trial court did not abuse its discretion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.