Notes of Decisions
Cited in
44
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case:
State v. Joseph, 2010 Ohio 954 (Ohio 2010).
State v. Joseph, 2010 Ohio 954 (Ohio 2010).
· cites it 4× “23 in pari materia with R.C. 2949.092, which states that certain additional court costs associated with R.”
State v. White, 103 Ohio St. 3d 580 (Ohio 2004).
· cites it 2× “R.C. 2949.092 outlines those circumstances in which a court may waive costs for indigents.”
State v. Clevenger, 114 Ohio St. 3d 258 (Ohio 2007).
· cites it 2× “R.C. 2949.092 permits a trial court to waive the payment of costs imposed if the trial court finds the defendant to be indigent.”
State v. Babyak, 2020 Ohio 325 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 2× “R.C. 2949.092. Thus, we review a trial court's decision denying a motion to waive costs for an abuse of discretion.”
State v. Sims, 2012 Ohio 238 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “Accordingly, Joseph requires that a trial court provide a defendant the statutory right to move for a waiver of costs based on indigency under R.C. 2949.092. Joseph, however, does not require the trial court to provide the defendant an opportunity to object to the repayment…”
State v. Welninski, 2018 Ohio 778 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“R.C. 2949.092 ; State v. Joseph , 125 Ohio St.”
State v. Copeland, 2016 Ohio 7797 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“R.C. 2949.092 does allow a court to waive mandatory costs if “the court determines that the offender is indigent.”
State v. Lux, 2012 Ohio 112 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
“An appellate court reviews the denial of a motion to waive payment of court costs under an abuse of discretion standard.”
State v. Dunson, 2016 Ohio 8365 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
“) R.C. 2949.092 provides that the court shall not waive any mandatory costs imposed in connection with a criminal conviction, “unless the court determines that the offender is indigent.”
State v. Phillips, 2017 Ohio 7107 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“R.C. 2949.092; State v. Joseph, 125 Ohio St.”
State v. Johnson, 2017 Ohio 8206 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
“At a defendant’s request, the trial court has the discretion to waive payment of the costs described in R.”
State v. Lantz, 2019 Ohio 3307 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
“{¶ 20} And R.C. 2949.092 reiterates that these costs must be imposed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.