Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2963.05 (2026)

Extradition of imprisoned person

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When it is desired to have returned to this state a person charged in this state with a crime, and such person is imprisoned or is held under criminal proceedings then pending against him in another state, the governor may agree with the executive authority of such other state for the extradition of such person before the conclusion of such proceedings or his term of sentence in such other state, upon condition that such person be returned to such other state at the expense of this state as soon as the prosecution in this state is terminated.

The governor may also surrender, on demand of the executive authority of any other state, any person in this state who is charged under section 2963.21 of the Revised Code with having violated the laws of the state whose executive authority is making the demand, even though such person left the demanding state involuntarily. This section shall be carried out by conforming to the procedure outlined in sections 2963.01 to 2963.27, inclusive, of the Revised Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1959–2016 · leading case: State v. Sands, 2016-Ohio-7150.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Sands, 2016-Ohio-7150. “01, R.C. 2963.05, and R.C. 2963.06 – do not stand for this proposition.”
Partsch v. Haskins, 175 Ohio St. 139 (1963). · cites it 4× “43, inclusive, Revised Code (removal of convict from Ohio Penitentiary), and Section 2963.05, Revised Code (extradition by executive agreement of person imprisoned in another state).”
State ex rel. Corbett v. Common Pleas Court, 168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 468 (Ohio 1959). · cites it 2× “Counsel for the respondent state that the sole question raised at this time is whether Section 2963.05, Revised Code, is a mandatory section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.