Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2963
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2963.06 (2026)

Surrender where accused was not in other state at time of commission of crime, and has not fled therefrom

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
October 1, 1953
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 1 - 100th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The governor may surrender, on demand of the executive authority of any other state, any person in this state charged in such other state in the manner provided in section 2963.03 of the Revised Code with committing an act in this state, or in a third state, intentionally resulting in a crime in the state whose executive authority is making the demand, and sections 2963.01 to 2963.27, inclusive, of the Revised Code, apply to such cases, even though the accused was not in that state at the time of the commission of the crime, and has not fled therefrom.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1959–2016 · leading case: In Re Extradition of Adams, 579 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Extradition of Adams, 579 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1989). · cites it 20× “In its decision, the trial court relied upon R.C. 2963.06, an exception to the rule set forth in R.”
State v. Sands, 2016-Ohio-7150. “05, and R.C. 2963.06 – do not stand for this proposition.”
Harris v. Sweeney, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 151 (Ohio 1959). · cites it 18× “e by habeas corpus is sought by one whose extradition is demanded? In each instance, the Governor and the court shall inquire *155 and determine (1) whether an offense is charged under the laws of the state demanding extradition, (2) whether the identity of the party charged is…”
Hanson v. Smith, 587 N.E.2d 345 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1990). · cites it 2× “03: "No demand for the extradition of a person charged with crime in another state shall be recognizedby the governor unless the demand is in writing alleging, except in cases arising under section 2963.06 of the Revised Code, that the accused was present in the demanding state…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.